Pythium insidiosum Keratitis: Past, Present, and Future

Bharat Gurnani, Kirandeep Kaur, Shweta Agarwal, Vaitheeswaran G. Lalgudi, Nakul S. Shekhawat, Anitha Venugopal, Koushik Tripathy, Bhaskar Srinivasan, Geetha Iyer, Joseph Gubert

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Pythiuminsidiosum (PI) is an oomycete, a protist belonging to the clade Stramenopila. PI causes vision-threatening keratitis closely mimicking fungal keratitis (FK), hence it is also labeled as “parafungus”. PI keratitis was initially confined to Thailand, USA, China, and Australia, but with growing clinical awareness and improvement in diagnostic modalities, the last decade saw a massive upsurge in numbers with the majority of reports coming from India. In the early 1990s, pythiosis was classified as vascular, cutaneous, gastrointestinal, systemic, and ocular. Clinically, morphologically, and microbiologically, PI keratitis closely resembles severe FK and requires a high index of clinical suspicion for diagnosis. The clinical features such as reticular dot infiltrate, tentacular projections, peripheral thinning with guttering, and rapid limbal spread distinguish it from other microorganisms. Routine smearing with Gram and KOH stain reveals perpendicular septate/aseptate hyphae, which closely mimic fungi and make the diagnosis cumbersome. The definitive diagnosis is the presence of dull grey/brown refractile colonies along with zoospore formation upon culture by leaf induction method. However, culture is time-consuming, and currently polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method is the gold standard. The value of other diagnostic modalities such as confocal microscopy and immunohistopathological assays is limited due to cost, non-availability, and limited diagnostic accuracy. PI keratitis is a relatively rare disease without established treatment protocols. Because of its resemblance to fungus, it was earlier treated with antifungals but with an improved understanding of its cell wall structure and absence of ergosterol, this is no longer recommended. Currently, antibacterials have shown promising results. Therapeutic keratoplasty with good margin (1 mm) is mandated for non-resolving cases and corneal perforation. In this review, we have deliberated on the evolution of PI keratitis, covered all the recently available literature, described our current understanding of the diagnosis and treatment, and the potential future diagnostic and management options for PI keratitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1629-1653
Number of pages25
JournalOphthalmology and Therapy
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Azithromycin
  • Keratitis
  • Leaf incarnation method
  • Linezolid
  • Parafungus
  • Pythiuminsidiosum
  • Therapeutic keratoplasty
  • Zoospore

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pythium insidiosum Keratitis: Past, Present, and Future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this