Pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: postoperative evaluation

S. O. Trerotola, B. Jones, D. W. Crist, John L Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy is becoming a popular alternative to the standard Whipple operation. Fluoroscopy plays an important role in postoperative assessment. The authors evaluated images of 50 consecutive patients who had undergone the newer procedure. Thirty-one complications were identified. Two normal variants that could be confused with abnormalities were noted: (a) the featureless appearance of the duodenal bulb may be mistaken for extravasation, and (b) contrast-material filling of the proximal jejunal loop at an end-to-end anastomosis with retained invaginated pancreas may be mistaken for intussusception. Another pitfall was failure to evaluate the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis fully, resulting in false-negative radiologic interpretations when leaks were present. The approach to postoperative examination of patients who have undergone the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure is different from that of patients who have undergone the standard procedure. Radiologists should be familiar with this approach, the normal postoperative anatomy, and pitfalls in imaging so that complications can be diagnosed and treated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)735-738
Number of pages4
JournalRadiology
Volume171
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Pylorus
Pancreaticojejunostomy
Intussusception
Fluoroscopy
Contrast Media
Pancreas
Anatomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Trerotola, S. O., Jones, B., Crist, D. W., & Cameron, J. L. (1989). Pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: postoperative evaluation. Radiology, 171(3), 735-738.

Pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy : postoperative evaluation. / Trerotola, S. O.; Jones, B.; Crist, D. W.; Cameron, John L.

In: Radiology, Vol. 171, No. 3, 1989, p. 735-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trerotola, SO, Jones, B, Crist, DW & Cameron, JL 1989, 'Pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: postoperative evaluation', Radiology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 735-738.
Trerotola, S. O. ; Jones, B. ; Crist, D. W. ; Cameron, John L. / Pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy : postoperative evaluation. In: Radiology. 1989 ; Vol. 171, No. 3. pp. 735-738.
@article{7e32595275a2449f85b1f40e70fe52e1,
title = "Pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: postoperative evaluation",
abstract = "The pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy is becoming a popular alternative to the standard Whipple operation. Fluoroscopy plays an important role in postoperative assessment. The authors evaluated images of 50 consecutive patients who had undergone the newer procedure. Thirty-one complications were identified. Two normal variants that could be confused with abnormalities were noted: (a) the featureless appearance of the duodenal bulb may be mistaken for extravasation, and (b) contrast-material filling of the proximal jejunal loop at an end-to-end anastomosis with retained invaginated pancreas may be mistaken for intussusception. Another pitfall was failure to evaluate the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis fully, resulting in false-negative radiologic interpretations when leaks were present. The approach to postoperative examination of patients who have undergone the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure is different from that of patients who have undergone the standard procedure. Radiologists should be familiar with this approach, the normal postoperative anatomy, and pitfalls in imaging so that complications can be diagnosed and treated.",
author = "Trerotola, {S. O.} and B. Jones and Crist, {D. W.} and Cameron, {John L}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "171",
pages = "735--738",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy

T2 - postoperative evaluation

AU - Trerotola, S. O.

AU - Jones, B.

AU - Crist, D. W.

AU - Cameron, John L

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - The pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy is becoming a popular alternative to the standard Whipple operation. Fluoroscopy plays an important role in postoperative assessment. The authors evaluated images of 50 consecutive patients who had undergone the newer procedure. Thirty-one complications were identified. Two normal variants that could be confused with abnormalities were noted: (a) the featureless appearance of the duodenal bulb may be mistaken for extravasation, and (b) contrast-material filling of the proximal jejunal loop at an end-to-end anastomosis with retained invaginated pancreas may be mistaken for intussusception. Another pitfall was failure to evaluate the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis fully, resulting in false-negative radiologic interpretations when leaks were present. The approach to postoperative examination of patients who have undergone the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure is different from that of patients who have undergone the standard procedure. Radiologists should be familiar with this approach, the normal postoperative anatomy, and pitfalls in imaging so that complications can be diagnosed and treated.

AB - The pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy is becoming a popular alternative to the standard Whipple operation. Fluoroscopy plays an important role in postoperative assessment. The authors evaluated images of 50 consecutive patients who had undergone the newer procedure. Thirty-one complications were identified. Two normal variants that could be confused with abnormalities were noted: (a) the featureless appearance of the duodenal bulb may be mistaken for extravasation, and (b) contrast-material filling of the proximal jejunal loop at an end-to-end anastomosis with retained invaginated pancreas may be mistaken for intussusception. Another pitfall was failure to evaluate the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis fully, resulting in false-negative radiologic interpretations when leaks were present. The approach to postoperative examination of patients who have undergone the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure is different from that of patients who have undergone the standard procedure. Radiologists should be familiar with this approach, the normal postoperative anatomy, and pitfalls in imaging so that complications can be diagnosed and treated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024332373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024332373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2717744

AN - SCOPUS:0024332373

VL - 171

SP - 735

EP - 738

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -