Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology

Myria Petrou, Leslie E. Quint, Bin Nan, Laurence H. Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess differences in volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules obtained using different CT slice thicknesses; correlate these differences with nodule size, shape, and margination; and compare measurements generated by two different software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy-five individual nodules identified on 29 low-dose, unenhanced, MDCT chest examinations were selected for volumetric analysis. Each image data set was reconstructed in three ways (slice thickness/reconstruction interval): 1.25 mm/0.625 mm, 2.5 mm/2 mm, and 5 mm/2.5 mm. Volumetric measurements were made on all 75 nodules at 1.25- and 2.5-mm slice thicknesses and on 57 of 75 nodules at the 5-mm thickness using Volume Analysis software. For 69 of 75 nodules, measurements were obtained on 1.25- and 2.5-mm-thick sections using a different commercially available software system, LN500 R2 software. Volume variability between different slice thicknesses was correlated with nodule diameter, shape, and margination using multiple linear regression. Percent differences between measurements obtained with the two software systems were calculated. Significance of relative volume differences between slice thicknesses and software packages was assessed using a one-sample Student's t-test. RESULTS. Although statistically significant differences in volumes between different sec-tion thicknesses were seen only for the tiny nodule size group, many individual nodules showed substantial volume variation. Significant differences were seen in nodule volume variability for smaller nodules (3-10 mm) compared with larger nodules (≥ 11 mm) (p <0.0001), as well as spiculated compared with smooth nodules, within a single size group (p <0.05). No effect of nodule shape (round vs elongated) was noted. Statistically significant differences in measurements obtained with the two software systems were seen only with 2.5-mm-thick sections (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION. CT slice thickness variation resulted in significant differences in volume measurements for tiny nodules. A spiculated margin was shown to have a significant effect on nodule volume variability within a single size group. Use of different software packages resulted in significant volume measurement differences at the 2.5-mm CT slice thickness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)306-312
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume188
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Software
Lung
Linear Models
Thorax
Students

Keywords

  • Chest
  • Lung disease
  • MDCT
  • Oncologic imaging
  • Pulmonary nodules
  • Volumetric evaluation and measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. / Petrou, Myria; Quint, Leslie E.; Nan, Bin; Baker, Laurence H.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 188, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 306-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Petrou, Myria ; Quint, Leslie E. ; Nan, Bin ; Baker, Laurence H. / Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2007 ; Vol. 188, No. 2. pp. 306-312.
@article{0ac938cb878c4d809f96fb22c50d3a64,
title = "Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess differences in volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules obtained using different CT slice thicknesses; correlate these differences with nodule size, shape, and margination; and compare measurements generated by two different software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy-five individual nodules identified on 29 low-dose, unenhanced, MDCT chest examinations were selected for volumetric analysis. Each image data set was reconstructed in three ways (slice thickness/reconstruction interval): 1.25 mm/0.625 mm, 2.5 mm/2 mm, and 5 mm/2.5 mm. Volumetric measurements were made on all 75 nodules at 1.25- and 2.5-mm slice thicknesses and on 57 of 75 nodules at the 5-mm thickness using Volume Analysis software. For 69 of 75 nodules, measurements were obtained on 1.25- and 2.5-mm-thick sections using a different commercially available software system, LN500 R2 software. Volume variability between different slice thicknesses was correlated with nodule diameter, shape, and margination using multiple linear regression. Percent differences between measurements obtained with the two software systems were calculated. Significance of relative volume differences between slice thicknesses and software packages was assessed using a one-sample Student's t-test. RESULTS. Although statistically significant differences in volumes between different sec-tion thicknesses were seen only for the tiny nodule size group, many individual nodules showed substantial volume variation. Significant differences were seen in nodule volume variability for smaller nodules (3-10 mm) compared with larger nodules (≥ 11 mm) (p <0.0001), as well as spiculated compared with smooth nodules, within a single size group (p <0.05). No effect of nodule shape (round vs elongated) was noted. Statistically significant differences in measurements obtained with the two software systems were seen only with 2.5-mm-thick sections (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION. CT slice thickness variation resulted in significant differences in volume measurements for tiny nodules. A spiculated margin was shown to have a significant effect on nodule volume variability within a single size group. Use of different software packages resulted in significant volume measurement differences at the 2.5-mm CT slice thickness.",
keywords = "Chest, Lung disease, MDCT, Oncologic imaging, Pulmonary nodules, Volumetric evaluation and measurement",
author = "Myria Petrou and Quint, {Leslie E.} and Bin Nan and Baker, {Laurence H.}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.05.1063",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "188",
pages = "306--312",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology

AU - Petrou, Myria

AU - Quint, Leslie E.

AU - Nan, Bin

AU - Baker, Laurence H.

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess differences in volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules obtained using different CT slice thicknesses; correlate these differences with nodule size, shape, and margination; and compare measurements generated by two different software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy-five individual nodules identified on 29 low-dose, unenhanced, MDCT chest examinations were selected for volumetric analysis. Each image data set was reconstructed in three ways (slice thickness/reconstruction interval): 1.25 mm/0.625 mm, 2.5 mm/2 mm, and 5 mm/2.5 mm. Volumetric measurements were made on all 75 nodules at 1.25- and 2.5-mm slice thicknesses and on 57 of 75 nodules at the 5-mm thickness using Volume Analysis software. For 69 of 75 nodules, measurements were obtained on 1.25- and 2.5-mm-thick sections using a different commercially available software system, LN500 R2 software. Volume variability between different slice thicknesses was correlated with nodule diameter, shape, and margination using multiple linear regression. Percent differences between measurements obtained with the two software systems were calculated. Significance of relative volume differences between slice thicknesses and software packages was assessed using a one-sample Student's t-test. RESULTS. Although statistically significant differences in volumes between different sec-tion thicknesses were seen only for the tiny nodule size group, many individual nodules showed substantial volume variation. Significant differences were seen in nodule volume variability for smaller nodules (3-10 mm) compared with larger nodules (≥ 11 mm) (p <0.0001), as well as spiculated compared with smooth nodules, within a single size group (p <0.05). No effect of nodule shape (round vs elongated) was noted. Statistically significant differences in measurements obtained with the two software systems were seen only with 2.5-mm-thick sections (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION. CT slice thickness variation resulted in significant differences in volume measurements for tiny nodules. A spiculated margin was shown to have a significant effect on nodule volume variability within a single size group. Use of different software packages resulted in significant volume measurement differences at the 2.5-mm CT slice thickness.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess differences in volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules obtained using different CT slice thicknesses; correlate these differences with nodule size, shape, and margination; and compare measurements generated by two different software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy-five individual nodules identified on 29 low-dose, unenhanced, MDCT chest examinations were selected for volumetric analysis. Each image data set was reconstructed in three ways (slice thickness/reconstruction interval): 1.25 mm/0.625 mm, 2.5 mm/2 mm, and 5 mm/2.5 mm. Volumetric measurements were made on all 75 nodules at 1.25- and 2.5-mm slice thicknesses and on 57 of 75 nodules at the 5-mm thickness using Volume Analysis software. For 69 of 75 nodules, measurements were obtained on 1.25- and 2.5-mm-thick sections using a different commercially available software system, LN500 R2 software. Volume variability between different slice thicknesses was correlated with nodule diameter, shape, and margination using multiple linear regression. Percent differences between measurements obtained with the two software systems were calculated. Significance of relative volume differences between slice thicknesses and software packages was assessed using a one-sample Student's t-test. RESULTS. Although statistically significant differences in volumes between different sec-tion thicknesses were seen only for the tiny nodule size group, many individual nodules showed substantial volume variation. Significant differences were seen in nodule volume variability for smaller nodules (3-10 mm) compared with larger nodules (≥ 11 mm) (p <0.0001), as well as spiculated compared with smooth nodules, within a single size group (p <0.05). No effect of nodule shape (round vs elongated) was noted. Statistically significant differences in measurements obtained with the two software systems were seen only with 2.5-mm-thick sections (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION. CT slice thickness variation resulted in significant differences in volume measurements for tiny nodules. A spiculated margin was shown to have a significant effect on nodule volume variability within a single size group. Use of different software packages resulted in significant volume measurement differences at the 2.5-mm CT slice thickness.

KW - Chest

KW - Lung disease

KW - MDCT

KW - Oncologic imaging

KW - Pulmonary nodules

KW - Volumetric evaluation and measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846527920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846527920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.05.1063

DO - 10.2214/AJR.05.1063

M3 - Article

VL - 188

SP - 306

EP - 312

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 2

ER -