Public reporting of patient satisfaction vs objective quality measures why must we choose? Can patients have both?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)865
Number of pages1
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume150
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Operative Surgical Procedures
Health Expenditures
Quality Improvement
Patient Satisfaction
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Public reporting of patient satisfaction vs objective quality measures why must we choose? Can patients have both? / Haut, Elliott.

In: JAMA Surgery, Vol. 150, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 865.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5605929174594b2da9eef98e4ffcefcc,
title = "Public reporting of patient satisfaction vs objective quality measures why must we choose? Can patients have both?",
author = "Elliott Haut",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1347",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "150",
pages = "865",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public reporting of patient satisfaction vs objective quality measures why must we choose? Can patients have both?

AU - Haut, Elliott

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942020672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942020672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1347

DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1347

M3 - Article

C2 - 26107506

AN - SCOPUS:84942020672

VL - 150

SP - 865

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -