Public Access Defibrillation: Is This Making Any Difference? Controversial Issues in Resuscitation from Cardiac Arrest

Myron L. Weisfeldt, Ross A. Pollack

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Public access defibrillation is particularly valuable in witnessed cardiac arrests that occur in public places. Bystander and police use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) has increased over the past 15 years, resulting in improved survival with normal or near-normal neurologic function. There is great promise for increasing bystander use of defibrillators as the technology is applied to linking patients with shockable arrests to volunteers committed to bringing AEDs to the patients. There continues to be controversy as to the value of epinephrine, antiarrhythmic drugs, hypothermia, and mechanical chest compression in resuscitative efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-557
Number of pages7
JournalCardiac Electrophysiology Clinics
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Automated external defibrillator
  • Bystander AED
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Defibrillation
  • Epinephrine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Public Access Defibrillation: Is This Making Any Difference? Controversial Issues in Resuscitation from Cardiac Arrest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this