Psychometric properties of the cognitive and linguistic scale: A follow-up study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: In a pediatric rehabilitation setting, monitoring recovery of cognitive skills is challenging due todiversity in age and brain injury severity. The Cognitive and Linguistic Scale (CALS) is a measure withpromising psychometric properties that was designed for inpatient pediatric rehabilitation care. This studyre-examines the reliability and validity of the CALS in a larger, independent sample. Method: Two hundredfifty-eight children (2-21 years) who were consecutively admitted to an inpatient brain injury facility between2008 and 2014 for a first inpatient rehabilitation admission following a traumatic or acquired brain injury wereincluded. Both CALS and Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) were examined atadmission and discharge. CALS scores by age groups (preschool-aged, school-aged, adolescents, or youngadults), gender, and etiology (acquired vs. traumatic brain injury) and in two subgroups. Results: The internalconsistency of the CALS was high. Total CALS score and individual item scores improved significantlybetween admission and discharge for children of all age groups, both genders, both traumatic and acquiredetiologies, and in subgroups with limited responsiveness and no change on the WeeFIM cognitive domain. Noage group had a floor or ceiling effect. Correlations with the WeeFIM were high. Factor analysis revealed 2factors (basic responding and higher-level cognitive skills). Conclusions: The CALS has strong psychometricproperties across a wide range of ages, brain injury etiologies, and cognitive severity. The CALS can be usedto track cognitive and linguistic recovery in children, adolescents, and young adults with brain injury duringinpatient rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-335
Number of pages8
JournalRehabilitation Psychology
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Psychometrics
Brain Injuries
Rehabilitation
Inpatients
Age Groups
Pediatrics
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Young Adult

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Brain injury
  • Children and adolescents
  • Cognition
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Psychometric properties of the cognitive and linguistic scale : A follow-up study. / Slomine, Beth S.; Grasmick, Paige H.; Suskauer, Stacy J.; Salorio, Cynthia F.

In: Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 3, 01.08.2016, p. 328-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Slomine, Beth S.; Grasmick, Paige H.; Suskauer, Stacy J.; Salorio, Cynthia F. / Psychometric properties of the cognitive and linguistic scale : A follow-up study.

In: Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 3, 01.08.2016, p. 328-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5372add2caa14095923df71d689f793d,
title = "Psychometric properties of the cognitive and linguistic scale: A follow-up study",
abstract = "Objective: In a pediatric rehabilitation setting, monitoring recovery of cognitive skills is challenging due todiversity in age and brain injury severity. The Cognitive and Linguistic Scale (CALS) is a measure withpromising psychometric properties that was designed for inpatient pediatric rehabilitation care. This studyre-examines the reliability and validity of the CALS in a larger, independent sample. Method: Two hundredfifty-eight children (2-21 years) who were consecutively admitted to an inpatient brain injury facility between2008 and 2014 for a first inpatient rehabilitation admission following a traumatic or acquired brain injury wereincluded. Both CALS and Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) were examined atadmission and discharge. CALS scores by age groups (preschool-aged, school-aged, adolescents, or youngadults), gender, and etiology (acquired vs. traumatic brain injury) and in two subgroups. Results: The internalconsistency of the CALS was high. Total CALS score and individual item scores improved significantlybetween admission and discharge for children of all age groups, both genders, both traumatic and acquiredetiologies, and in subgroups with limited responsiveness and no change on the WeeFIM cognitive domain. Noage group had a floor or ceiling effect. Correlations with the WeeFIM were high. Factor analysis revealed 2factors (basic responding and higher-level cognitive skills). Conclusions: The CALS has strong psychometricproperties across a wide range of ages, brain injury etiologies, and cognitive severity. The CALS can be usedto track cognitive and linguistic recovery in children, adolescents, and young adults with brain injury duringinpatient rehabilitation.",
keywords = "Assessment, Brain injury, Children and adolescents, Cognition, Rehabilitation",
author = "Slomine, {Beth S.} and Grasmick, {Paige H.} and Suskauer, {Stacy J.} and Salorio, {Cynthia F.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/rep0000096",
volume = "61",
pages = "328--335",
journal = "Rehabilitation Psychology",
issn = "0090-5550",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric properties of the cognitive and linguistic scale

T2 - Rehabilitation Psychology

AU - Slomine,Beth S.

AU - Grasmick,Paige H.

AU - Suskauer,Stacy J.

AU - Salorio,Cynthia F.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Objective: In a pediatric rehabilitation setting, monitoring recovery of cognitive skills is challenging due todiversity in age and brain injury severity. The Cognitive and Linguistic Scale (CALS) is a measure withpromising psychometric properties that was designed for inpatient pediatric rehabilitation care. This studyre-examines the reliability and validity of the CALS in a larger, independent sample. Method: Two hundredfifty-eight children (2-21 years) who were consecutively admitted to an inpatient brain injury facility between2008 and 2014 for a first inpatient rehabilitation admission following a traumatic or acquired brain injury wereincluded. Both CALS and Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) were examined atadmission and discharge. CALS scores by age groups (preschool-aged, school-aged, adolescents, or youngadults), gender, and etiology (acquired vs. traumatic brain injury) and in two subgroups. Results: The internalconsistency of the CALS was high. Total CALS score and individual item scores improved significantlybetween admission and discharge for children of all age groups, both genders, both traumatic and acquiredetiologies, and in subgroups with limited responsiveness and no change on the WeeFIM cognitive domain. Noage group had a floor or ceiling effect. Correlations with the WeeFIM were high. Factor analysis revealed 2factors (basic responding and higher-level cognitive skills). Conclusions: The CALS has strong psychometricproperties across a wide range of ages, brain injury etiologies, and cognitive severity. The CALS can be usedto track cognitive and linguistic recovery in children, adolescents, and young adults with brain injury duringinpatient rehabilitation.

AB - Objective: In a pediatric rehabilitation setting, monitoring recovery of cognitive skills is challenging due todiversity in age and brain injury severity. The Cognitive and Linguistic Scale (CALS) is a measure withpromising psychometric properties that was designed for inpatient pediatric rehabilitation care. This studyre-examines the reliability and validity of the CALS in a larger, independent sample. Method: Two hundredfifty-eight children (2-21 years) who were consecutively admitted to an inpatient brain injury facility between2008 and 2014 for a first inpatient rehabilitation admission following a traumatic or acquired brain injury wereincluded. Both CALS and Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) were examined atadmission and discharge. CALS scores by age groups (preschool-aged, school-aged, adolescents, or youngadults), gender, and etiology (acquired vs. traumatic brain injury) and in two subgroups. Results: The internalconsistency of the CALS was high. Total CALS score and individual item scores improved significantlybetween admission and discharge for children of all age groups, both genders, both traumatic and acquiredetiologies, and in subgroups with limited responsiveness and no change on the WeeFIM cognitive domain. Noage group had a floor or ceiling effect. Correlations with the WeeFIM were high. Factor analysis revealed 2factors (basic responding and higher-level cognitive skills). Conclusions: The CALS has strong psychometricproperties across a wide range of ages, brain injury etiologies, and cognitive severity. The CALS can be usedto track cognitive and linguistic recovery in children, adolescents, and young adults with brain injury duringinpatient rehabilitation.

KW - Assessment

KW - Brain injury

KW - Children and adolescents

KW - Cognition

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984819429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984819429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/rep0000096

DO - 10.1037/rep0000096

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 328

EP - 335

JO - Rehabilitation Psychology

JF - Rehabilitation Psychology

SN - 0090-5550

IS - 3

ER -