Pseudarthrosis repair: Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft

David B Cohen, Areesak Chotivichit, Takuya Fujita, Tze Hong Wong, Cameron B. Huckell, Ann N. Sieber, John P. Kostuik, H. Christopher Lawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Pseudarthrosis repair in the lumbar spine is one of the most challenging problems faced by spine surgeons. Historically high failure rates with posterior repair have led to the use of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with tricortical iliac crest autograft in these difficult cases. More recently, femoral ring allografts packed with autograft bone have been advocated as another method that would decrease donor site morbidity. Two series of patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior instrumentation to repair pseudarthrosis (Group I, 33 patients with tricortical autogenous iliac crest and Group II, 20 patients with femoral ring allografts). At minimum 2-year followup, there was no difference in fusion rates (Group I, 32 of 33 versus Group II, 20 of 20). Patients in Group I had radiographic fusion develop more rapidly than patients in Group II (12 months versus 18 months), but a significant proportion of patients in Group I (35%) had an average of 2 mm of graft subsidence. Despite excellent fusion rates in both groups, functional outcomes were not as good with only 28% of patients in Group I and 36% of patients in Group II returning to work. Using anterior instrumentation, anterior interbody fusion offers an excellent method to repair pseudarthrosis using femoral ring allografts or autogenous iliac crest. However, femoral ring allografts offer the potential to decrease donor site morbidity, allowing the surgeon to treat multiple spine levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-55
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number371
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Pseudarthrosis
Thigh
Allografts
Spine
Autografts
Tissue Donors
Morbidity
Transplants
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Cohen, D. B., Chotivichit, A., Fujita, T., Wong, T. H., Huckell, C. B., Sieber, A. N., ... Lawson, H. C. (2000). Pseudarthrosis repair: Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (371), 46-55.

Pseudarthrosis repair : Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft. / Cohen, David B; Chotivichit, Areesak; Fujita, Takuya; Wong, Tze Hong; Huckell, Cameron B.; Sieber, Ann N.; Kostuik, John P.; Lawson, H. Christopher.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 371, 2000, p. 46-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, DB, Chotivichit, A, Fujita, T, Wong, TH, Huckell, CB, Sieber, AN, Kostuik, JP & Lawson, HC 2000, 'Pseudarthrosis repair: Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft', Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 371, pp. 46-55.
Cohen DB, Chotivichit A, Fujita T, Wong TH, Huckell CB, Sieber AN et al. Pseudarthrosis repair: Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2000;(371):46-55.
Cohen, David B ; Chotivichit, Areesak ; Fujita, Takuya ; Wong, Tze Hong ; Huckell, Cameron B. ; Sieber, Ann N. ; Kostuik, John P. ; Lawson, H. Christopher. / Pseudarthrosis repair : Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2000 ; No. 371. pp. 46-55.
@article{a35d28e158994c00ae3dca24d5830aef,
title = "Pseudarthrosis repair: Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft",
abstract = "Pseudarthrosis repair in the lumbar spine is one of the most challenging problems faced by spine surgeons. Historically high failure rates with posterior repair have led to the use of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with tricortical iliac crest autograft in these difficult cases. More recently, femoral ring allografts packed with autograft bone have been advocated as another method that would decrease donor site morbidity. Two series of patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior instrumentation to repair pseudarthrosis (Group I, 33 patients with tricortical autogenous iliac crest and Group II, 20 patients with femoral ring allografts). At minimum 2-year followup, there was no difference in fusion rates (Group I, 32 of 33 versus Group II, 20 of 20). Patients in Group I had radiographic fusion develop more rapidly than patients in Group II (12 months versus 18 months), but a significant proportion of patients in Group I (35{\%}) had an average of 2 mm of graft subsidence. Despite excellent fusion rates in both groups, functional outcomes were not as good with only 28{\%} of patients in Group I and 36{\%} of patients in Group II returning to work. Using anterior instrumentation, anterior interbody fusion offers an excellent method to repair pseudarthrosis using femoral ring allografts or autogenous iliac crest. However, femoral ring allografts offer the potential to decrease donor site morbidity, allowing the surgeon to treat multiple spine levels.",
author = "Cohen, {David B} and Areesak Chotivichit and Takuya Fujita and Wong, {Tze Hong} and Huckell, {Cameron B.} and Sieber, {Ann N.} and Kostuik, {John P.} and Lawson, {H. Christopher}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "46--55",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "371",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pseudarthrosis repair

T2 - Autogenous iliac crest versus femoral ring allograft

AU - Cohen, David B

AU - Chotivichit, Areesak

AU - Fujita, Takuya

AU - Wong, Tze Hong

AU - Huckell, Cameron B.

AU - Sieber, Ann N.

AU - Kostuik, John P.

AU - Lawson, H. Christopher

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Pseudarthrosis repair in the lumbar spine is one of the most challenging problems faced by spine surgeons. Historically high failure rates with posterior repair have led to the use of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with tricortical iliac crest autograft in these difficult cases. More recently, femoral ring allografts packed with autograft bone have been advocated as another method that would decrease donor site morbidity. Two series of patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior instrumentation to repair pseudarthrosis (Group I, 33 patients with tricortical autogenous iliac crest and Group II, 20 patients with femoral ring allografts). At minimum 2-year followup, there was no difference in fusion rates (Group I, 32 of 33 versus Group II, 20 of 20). Patients in Group I had radiographic fusion develop more rapidly than patients in Group II (12 months versus 18 months), but a significant proportion of patients in Group I (35%) had an average of 2 mm of graft subsidence. Despite excellent fusion rates in both groups, functional outcomes were not as good with only 28% of patients in Group I and 36% of patients in Group II returning to work. Using anterior instrumentation, anterior interbody fusion offers an excellent method to repair pseudarthrosis using femoral ring allografts or autogenous iliac crest. However, femoral ring allografts offer the potential to decrease donor site morbidity, allowing the surgeon to treat multiple spine levels.

AB - Pseudarthrosis repair in the lumbar spine is one of the most challenging problems faced by spine surgeons. Historically high failure rates with posterior repair have led to the use of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with tricortical iliac crest autograft in these difficult cases. More recently, femoral ring allografts packed with autograft bone have been advocated as another method that would decrease donor site morbidity. Two series of patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior instrumentation to repair pseudarthrosis (Group I, 33 patients with tricortical autogenous iliac crest and Group II, 20 patients with femoral ring allografts). At minimum 2-year followup, there was no difference in fusion rates (Group I, 32 of 33 versus Group II, 20 of 20). Patients in Group I had radiographic fusion develop more rapidly than patients in Group II (12 months versus 18 months), but a significant proportion of patients in Group I (35%) had an average of 2 mm of graft subsidence. Despite excellent fusion rates in both groups, functional outcomes were not as good with only 28% of patients in Group I and 36% of patients in Group II returning to work. Using anterior instrumentation, anterior interbody fusion offers an excellent method to repair pseudarthrosis using femoral ring allografts or autogenous iliac crest. However, femoral ring allografts offer the potential to decrease donor site morbidity, allowing the surgeon to treat multiple spine levels.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033961006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033961006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10693549

AN - SCOPUS:0033961006

SP - 46

EP - 55

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 371

ER -