Providing more through less: Current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy

Avraham Schlager, Abed Khalaileh, Noam Shussman, Ram Elazary, Andrei Keidar, Alon J. Pikarsky, Avi Ben-Shushan, Oren Shibolet, Santiago Horgan, Mark Talamini, Gideon Zamir, Avraham I. Rivkind, Yoav Mintz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background As the field of minimally invasive surgery continues to develop, surgeons are confronted with the challenge of performing conventional laparoscopic surgeries through fewer incisions while maintaining the same degree of safety and surgical efficiency. Most of these methods involve elimination of the ports previously designated for retraction. As a result, minimally invasive surgeons have been forced to develop minimally invasive and ingenious methods for providing adequate retraction for these procedures. Herein we present our experience using endoloops and internal retractors to provide retraction during Single Incision Minimally Invasive Surgery (SIMIS) and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) cholecystectomy. We also present a review of the alternative retraction methods currently being employed for these surgeries. Methods SIMIS was performed on 20 patients and NOTES was performed on 5 patients at our institution. Endoloops or internal retractors were used to provide retraction for all SIMIS procedures. Internal retractors provided retraction for all NOTES procedures. Results Successful cholecystectomy was accomplished in all cases. One SIMIS surgery required conversion to standard laparoscopy due to complex anatomy. There were no intraoperative complications. Although adequate retraction was accomplished in all cases, the internal retractors were found to provide superior and more versatile retraction comparedto that of endoloops. Conclusion Adequate retraction greatly simplifies SIMIS and NOTES surgery. Endograb internal retractors were easy to use and were found to provide optimal retraction and exposure during these procedures without complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1542-1546
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopy
Intraoperative Complications
Anatomy
Safety

Keywords

  • Instruments
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Retraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Schlager, A., Khalaileh, A., Shussman, N., Elazary, R., Keidar, A., Pikarsky, A. J., ... Mintz, Y. (2010). Providing more through less: Current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 24(7), 1542-1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0807-6

Providing more through less : Current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy. / Schlager, Avraham; Khalaileh, Abed; Shussman, Noam; Elazary, Ram; Keidar, Andrei; Pikarsky, Alon J.; Ben-Shushan, Avi; Shibolet, Oren; Horgan, Santiago; Talamini, Mark; Zamir, Gideon; Rivkind, Avraham I.; Mintz, Yoav.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 24, No. 7, 07.2010, p. 1542-1546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schlager, A, Khalaileh, A, Shussman, N, Elazary, R, Keidar, A, Pikarsky, AJ, Ben-Shushan, A, Shibolet, O, Horgan, S, Talamini, M, Zamir, G, Rivkind, AI & Mintz, Y 2010, 'Providing more through less: Current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy', Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1542-1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0807-6
Schlager, Avraham ; Khalaileh, Abed ; Shussman, Noam ; Elazary, Ram ; Keidar, Andrei ; Pikarsky, Alon J. ; Ben-Shushan, Avi ; Shibolet, Oren ; Horgan, Santiago ; Talamini, Mark ; Zamir, Gideon ; Rivkind, Avraham I. ; Mintz, Yoav. / Providing more through less : Current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 1542-1546.
@article{e58e3874ce804f19a71cd3993a562129,
title = "Providing more through less: Current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy",
abstract = "Background As the field of minimally invasive surgery continues to develop, surgeons are confronted with the challenge of performing conventional laparoscopic surgeries through fewer incisions while maintaining the same degree of safety and surgical efficiency. Most of these methods involve elimination of the ports previously designated for retraction. As a result, minimally invasive surgeons have been forced to develop minimally invasive and ingenious methods for providing adequate retraction for these procedures. Herein we present our experience using endoloops and internal retractors to provide retraction during Single Incision Minimally Invasive Surgery (SIMIS) and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) cholecystectomy. We also present a review of the alternative retraction methods currently being employed for these surgeries. Methods SIMIS was performed on 20 patients and NOTES was performed on 5 patients at our institution. Endoloops or internal retractors were used to provide retraction for all SIMIS procedures. Internal retractors provided retraction for all NOTES procedures. Results Successful cholecystectomy was accomplished in all cases. One SIMIS surgery required conversion to standard laparoscopy due to complex anatomy. There were no intraoperative complications. Although adequate retraction was accomplished in all cases, the internal retractors were found to provide superior and more versatile retraction comparedto that of endoloops. Conclusion Adequate retraction greatly simplifies SIMIS and NOTES surgery. Endograb internal retractors were easy to use and were found to provide optimal retraction and exposure during these procedures without complications.",
keywords = "Instruments, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Retraction",
author = "Avraham Schlager and Abed Khalaileh and Noam Shussman and Ram Elazary and Andrei Keidar and Pikarsky, {Alon J.} and Avi Ben-Shushan and Oren Shibolet and Santiago Horgan and Mark Talamini and Gideon Zamir and Rivkind, {Avraham I.} and Yoav Mintz",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-009-0807-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1542--1546",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Providing more through less

T2 - Current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy

AU - Schlager, Avraham

AU - Khalaileh, Abed

AU - Shussman, Noam

AU - Elazary, Ram

AU - Keidar, Andrei

AU - Pikarsky, Alon J.

AU - Ben-Shushan, Avi

AU - Shibolet, Oren

AU - Horgan, Santiago

AU - Talamini, Mark

AU - Zamir, Gideon

AU - Rivkind, Avraham I.

AU - Mintz, Yoav

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Background As the field of minimally invasive surgery continues to develop, surgeons are confronted with the challenge of performing conventional laparoscopic surgeries through fewer incisions while maintaining the same degree of safety and surgical efficiency. Most of these methods involve elimination of the ports previously designated for retraction. As a result, minimally invasive surgeons have been forced to develop minimally invasive and ingenious methods for providing adequate retraction for these procedures. Herein we present our experience using endoloops and internal retractors to provide retraction during Single Incision Minimally Invasive Surgery (SIMIS) and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) cholecystectomy. We also present a review of the alternative retraction methods currently being employed for these surgeries. Methods SIMIS was performed on 20 patients and NOTES was performed on 5 patients at our institution. Endoloops or internal retractors were used to provide retraction for all SIMIS procedures. Internal retractors provided retraction for all NOTES procedures. Results Successful cholecystectomy was accomplished in all cases. One SIMIS surgery required conversion to standard laparoscopy due to complex anatomy. There were no intraoperative complications. Although adequate retraction was accomplished in all cases, the internal retractors were found to provide superior and more versatile retraction comparedto that of endoloops. Conclusion Adequate retraction greatly simplifies SIMIS and NOTES surgery. Endograb internal retractors were easy to use and were found to provide optimal retraction and exposure during these procedures without complications.

AB - Background As the field of minimally invasive surgery continues to develop, surgeons are confronted with the challenge of performing conventional laparoscopic surgeries through fewer incisions while maintaining the same degree of safety and surgical efficiency. Most of these methods involve elimination of the ports previously designated for retraction. As a result, minimally invasive surgeons have been forced to develop minimally invasive and ingenious methods for providing adequate retraction for these procedures. Herein we present our experience using endoloops and internal retractors to provide retraction during Single Incision Minimally Invasive Surgery (SIMIS) and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) cholecystectomy. We also present a review of the alternative retraction methods currently being employed for these surgeries. Methods SIMIS was performed on 20 patients and NOTES was performed on 5 patients at our institution. Endoloops or internal retractors were used to provide retraction for all SIMIS procedures. Internal retractors provided retraction for all NOTES procedures. Results Successful cholecystectomy was accomplished in all cases. One SIMIS surgery required conversion to standard laparoscopy due to complex anatomy. There were no intraoperative complications. Although adequate retraction was accomplished in all cases, the internal retractors were found to provide superior and more versatile retraction comparedto that of endoloops. Conclusion Adequate retraction greatly simplifies SIMIS and NOTES surgery. Endograb internal retractors were easy to use and were found to provide optimal retraction and exposure during these procedures without complications.

KW - Instruments

KW - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

KW - Retraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955662685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955662685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-009-0807-6

DO - 10.1007/s00464-009-0807-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 20035352

AN - SCOPUS:77955662685

VL - 24

SP - 1542

EP - 1546

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 7

ER -