Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy

Wenhua Cao, Gino Lim, Li Liao, Yupeng Li, Shengpeng Jiang, Xiaoqiang Li, Heng Li, Kazumichi Suzuki, X. Ronald Zhu, Daniel Gomez, Xiaodong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is commonly delivered via the spotscanning technique. To 'scan' the target volume, the proton beam is controlled by varying its energy to penetrate the patient's body at different depths. Although scanning the proton beamlets or spots with the same energy can be as fast as 10-20 m s-1, changing from one proton energy to another requires approximately two additional seconds. The total IMPT delivery time thus depends mainly on the number of proton energies used in a treatment. Current treatment planning systems typically use all proton energies that are required for the proton beam to penetrate in a range from the distal edge to the proximal edge of the target. The optimal selection of proton energies has not been well studied. In this study, we sought to determine the feasibility of optimizing and reducing the number of proton energies in IMPT planning. We proposed an iterative mixed-integer programming optimization method to select a subset of all available proton energies while satisfying dosimetric criteria. We applied our proposed method to six patient datasets: four cases of prostate cancer, one case of lung cancer, and one case of mesothelioma. The numbers of energies were reduced by 14.3%-18.9% for the prostate cancer cases, 11.0% for the lung cancer cases and 26.5% for the mesothelioma case. The results indicate that the number of proton energies used in conventionally designed IMPT plans can be reduced without degrading dosimetric performance. The IMPT delivery efficiency could be improved by energy layer optimization leading to increased throughput for a busy proton center in which a delivery system with slow energy switch is employed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6341
Pages (from-to)6341-6354
Number of pages14
JournalPhysics in medicine and biology
Volume59
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 7 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy Planning
Radiotherapy Dosage
Proton Therapy
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Protons
Prostatic Neoplasms
Mesothelioma
Lung Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Energy layer
  • IMPT
  • Optimizaiton

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Cao, W., Lim, G., Liao, L., Li, Y., Jiang, S., Li, X., ... Zhang, X. (2014). Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Physics in medicine and biology, 59(21), 6341-6354. [6341]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6341

Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy. / Cao, Wenhua; Lim, Gino; Liao, Li; Li, Yupeng; Jiang, Shengpeng; Li, Xiaoqiang; Li, Heng; Suzuki, Kazumichi; Zhu, X. Ronald; Gomez, Daniel; Zhang, Xiaodong.

In: Physics in medicine and biology, Vol. 59, No. 21, 6341, 07.11.2014, p. 6341-6354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cao, W, Lim, G, Liao, L, Li, Y, Jiang, S, Li, X, Li, H, Suzuki, K, Zhu, XR, Gomez, D & Zhang, X 2014, 'Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy', Physics in medicine and biology, vol. 59, no. 21, 6341, pp. 6341-6354. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6341
Cao, Wenhua ; Lim, Gino ; Liao, Li ; Li, Yupeng ; Jiang, Shengpeng ; Li, Xiaoqiang ; Li, Heng ; Suzuki, Kazumichi ; Zhu, X. Ronald ; Gomez, Daniel ; Zhang, Xiaodong. / Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy. In: Physics in medicine and biology. 2014 ; Vol. 59, No. 21. pp. 6341-6354.
@article{f71532b761724382960c64795965dc4c,
title = "Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy",
abstract = "Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is commonly delivered via the spotscanning technique. To 'scan' the target volume, the proton beam is controlled by varying its energy to penetrate the patient's body at different depths. Although scanning the proton beamlets or spots with the same energy can be as fast as 10-20 m s-1, changing from one proton energy to another requires approximately two additional seconds. The total IMPT delivery time thus depends mainly on the number of proton energies used in a treatment. Current treatment planning systems typically use all proton energies that are required for the proton beam to penetrate in a range from the distal edge to the proximal edge of the target. The optimal selection of proton energies has not been well studied. In this study, we sought to determine the feasibility of optimizing and reducing the number of proton energies in IMPT planning. We proposed an iterative mixed-integer programming optimization method to select a subset of all available proton energies while satisfying dosimetric criteria. We applied our proposed method to six patient datasets: four cases of prostate cancer, one case of lung cancer, and one case of mesothelioma. The numbers of energies were reduced by 14.3{\%}-18.9{\%} for the prostate cancer cases, 11.0{\%} for the lung cancer cases and 26.5{\%} for the mesothelioma case. The results indicate that the number of proton energies used in conventionally designed IMPT plans can be reduced without degrading dosimetric performance. The IMPT delivery efficiency could be improved by energy layer optimization leading to increased throughput for a busy proton center in which a delivery system with slow energy switch is employed.",
keywords = "Energy layer, IMPT, Optimizaiton",
author = "Wenhua Cao and Gino Lim and Li Liao and Yupeng Li and Shengpeng Jiang and Xiaoqiang Li and Heng Li and Kazumichi Suzuki and Zhu, {X. Ronald} and Daniel Gomez and Xiaodong Zhang",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6341",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "6341--6354",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy

AU - Cao, Wenhua

AU - Lim, Gino

AU - Liao, Li

AU - Li, Yupeng

AU - Jiang, Shengpeng

AU - Li, Xiaoqiang

AU - Li, Heng

AU - Suzuki, Kazumichi

AU - Zhu, X. Ronald

AU - Gomez, Daniel

AU - Zhang, Xiaodong

PY - 2014/11/7

Y1 - 2014/11/7

N2 - Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is commonly delivered via the spotscanning technique. To 'scan' the target volume, the proton beam is controlled by varying its energy to penetrate the patient's body at different depths. Although scanning the proton beamlets or spots with the same energy can be as fast as 10-20 m s-1, changing from one proton energy to another requires approximately two additional seconds. The total IMPT delivery time thus depends mainly on the number of proton energies used in a treatment. Current treatment planning systems typically use all proton energies that are required for the proton beam to penetrate in a range from the distal edge to the proximal edge of the target. The optimal selection of proton energies has not been well studied. In this study, we sought to determine the feasibility of optimizing and reducing the number of proton energies in IMPT planning. We proposed an iterative mixed-integer programming optimization method to select a subset of all available proton energies while satisfying dosimetric criteria. We applied our proposed method to six patient datasets: four cases of prostate cancer, one case of lung cancer, and one case of mesothelioma. The numbers of energies were reduced by 14.3%-18.9% for the prostate cancer cases, 11.0% for the lung cancer cases and 26.5% for the mesothelioma case. The results indicate that the number of proton energies used in conventionally designed IMPT plans can be reduced without degrading dosimetric performance. The IMPT delivery efficiency could be improved by energy layer optimization leading to increased throughput for a busy proton center in which a delivery system with slow energy switch is employed.

AB - Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is commonly delivered via the spotscanning technique. To 'scan' the target volume, the proton beam is controlled by varying its energy to penetrate the patient's body at different depths. Although scanning the proton beamlets or spots with the same energy can be as fast as 10-20 m s-1, changing from one proton energy to another requires approximately two additional seconds. The total IMPT delivery time thus depends mainly on the number of proton energies used in a treatment. Current treatment planning systems typically use all proton energies that are required for the proton beam to penetrate in a range from the distal edge to the proximal edge of the target. The optimal selection of proton energies has not been well studied. In this study, we sought to determine the feasibility of optimizing and reducing the number of proton energies in IMPT planning. We proposed an iterative mixed-integer programming optimization method to select a subset of all available proton energies while satisfying dosimetric criteria. We applied our proposed method to six patient datasets: four cases of prostate cancer, one case of lung cancer, and one case of mesothelioma. The numbers of energies were reduced by 14.3%-18.9% for the prostate cancer cases, 11.0% for the lung cancer cases and 26.5% for the mesothelioma case. The results indicate that the number of proton energies used in conventionally designed IMPT plans can be reduced without degrading dosimetric performance. The IMPT delivery efficiency could be improved by energy layer optimization leading to increased throughput for a busy proton center in which a delivery system with slow energy switch is employed.

KW - Energy layer

KW - IMPT

KW - Optimizaiton

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908377659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908377659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6341

DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6341

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 6341

EP - 6354

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 21

M1 - 6341

ER -