TY - JOUR
T1 - Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1
T2 - 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
AU - Turkbey, Baris
AU - Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
AU - Haider, Masoom A.
AU - Padhani, Anwar R.
AU - Villeirs, Geert
AU - Macura, Katarzyna J.
AU - Tempany, Clare M.
AU - Choyke, Peter L.
AU - Cornud, Francois
AU - Margolis, Daniel J.
AU - Thoeny, Harriet C.
AU - Verma, Sadhna
AU - Barentsz, Jelle
AU - Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) was developed with a consensus-based process using a combination of published data, and expert observations and opinions. In the short time since its release, numerous studies have validated the value of PI-RADS v2 but, as expected, have also identified a number of ambiguities and limitations, some of which have been documented in the literature with potential solutions offered. To address these issues, the PI-RADS Steering Committee, again using a consensus-based process, has recommended several modifications to PI-RADS v2, maintaining the framework of assigning scores to individual sequences and using these scores to derive an overall assessment category. This updated version, described in this article, is termed PI-RADS v2.1. It is anticipated that the adoption of these PI-RADS v2.1 modifications will improve inter-reader variability and simplify PI-RADS assessment of prostate magnetic resonance imaging even further. Research on the value and limitations on all components of PI-RADS v2.1 is strongly encouraged.
AB - The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) was developed with a consensus-based process using a combination of published data, and expert observations and opinions. In the short time since its release, numerous studies have validated the value of PI-RADS v2 but, as expected, have also identified a number of ambiguities and limitations, some of which have been documented in the literature with potential solutions offered. To address these issues, the PI-RADS Steering Committee, again using a consensus-based process, has recommended several modifications to PI-RADS v2, maintaining the framework of assigning scores to individual sequences and using these scores to derive an overall assessment category. This updated version, described in this article, is termed PI-RADS v2.1. It is anticipated that the adoption of these PI-RADS v2.1 modifications will improve inter-reader variability and simplify PI-RADS assessment of prostate magnetic resonance imaging even further. Research on the value and limitations on all components of PI-RADS v2.1 is strongly encouraged.
KW - Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
KW - Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1
KW - Prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063010991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063010991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30898406
AN - SCOPUS:85063010991
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 76
SP - 340
EP - 351
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 3
ER -