Prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in photorefractive keratectomy: Analysis of visual outcomes and higher-order aberrations

Majid Moshirfar, Daniel S. Churgin, Brent S. Betts, Maylon Hsu, Shameema Sikder, Marcus Neuffer, Dane Church, Mark D. Mifflin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare differences in visual outcomes, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and dry eye in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy using wavefront-guided VISX CustomVue™ and wavefront-optimized WaveLight® Allegretto platforms. Methods: In this randomized, prospective, single-masked, fellow-eye study, photorefractive keratectomy was performed on 46 eyes from 23 patients, with one eye randomized to WaveLight Allegretto, and the fellow eye receiving VISX CustomVue. Three-month postoperative outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, refractive error, root mean square of total and grouped higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and Schirmer's testing. Results: Mean values for uncorrected distance visual acuity (logMAR) were -0.03 ± 0.07 and -0.06 ± 0.09 in the wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided groups, respectively (P = 0.121). Uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved in 91% of eyes receiving wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy, and 87% of eyes receiving wavefrontoptimized photorefractive keratectomy, whereas uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/15 was achieved in 35% of the wavefront-optimized group and 64% of the wavefront-guided group (P ≥ 0.296). While root mean square of total higher-order aberration, coma, and trefoil tended to increase in the wavefront-optimized group (P = 0.091, P = 0.115, P = 0.459, respectively), only spherical aberration increased significantly (P = 0.014). Similar increases were found in wavefront- guided root mean square of total higher-order aberration (P = 0.113), coma (P = 0.403), trefoil (P = 0.603), and spherical aberration (P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in spherical aberration change when comparing the two platforms. The wavefront-guided group showed an increase in contrast sensitivity at 12 cycles per degree (P = 0.013). Conclusion: Both VISX CustomVue and WaveLight Allegretto platforms performed equally in terms of visual acuity, safety, and predictability in photorefractive keratectomy. The wavefrontguided group showed slightly improved contrast sensitivity. Both lasers induced a comparable degree of statistically significant spherical aberration, and tended to increase other higher-order aberration measures as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1185-1193
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Ophthalmology
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Photorefractive keratectomy
  • Wavefront-guided
  • Wavefront-optimized

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight<sup>®</sup> Allegretto Wave<sup>®</sup> Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in photorefractive keratectomy: Analysis of visual outcomes and higher-order aberrations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this