TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective quality-of-life assessment in patients receiving concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy as a bladder preservation strategy
AU - Herman, Joseph M.
AU - Smith, David C.
AU - Montie, James
AU - Hayman, James A.
AU - Sullivan, Molly A.
AU - Kent, Elizabeth
AU - Griffith, Kent A.
AU - Esper, Peggy
AU - Sandler, Howard M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by a grant from Eli Lilly and Company, and grant 5 P30 CA46592 from the National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health.
PY - 2004/7
Y1 - 2004/7
N2 - Objectives To assess, in a Phase I study, whether bladder preservation with concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy (RT) influenced patient-reported quality of life (QOL) as determined by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BL). Methods Between January 1998 and March 2002, 24 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were enrolled, and 23 patients underwent transuretheral resection of bladder tumor, followed by twice-weekly gemcitabine with concurrent RT. The initial dose was 10 mg/m2 given twice weekly and increased as tolerated. To assess treatment-related QOL, patients completed the FACT-BL questionnaire. Results Of the 24 patients enrolled, 23 (96%) were assessed for toxicity and response. The FACT-generic (G) QOL assessment was obtained from 22 (92%) of 23 patients. No statistically significant difference was found in the FACT-G or FACT-BL or the combination before, during, or after treatment. The FACT-BL values were lower in patients who received higher doses of gemcitabine (greater than 20 mg/m2 versus 20 mg/m2 or less). At least one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was experienced by 5 (23%) of 22 patients. The FACT-G values were lower for those patients who experienced DLT (difference of -13.1, P = 0.07). The physical well-being scores for patients who experienced DLT were lower after treatment (difference of -5.2, P = 0.03) compared with those without DLT. Conclusions Concurrent RT and gemcitabine failed to statistically influence patient-reported QOL, although patients who received higher doses reported lower FACT-BL scores. The results of this study suggest that concurrent gemcitabine with conformal RT is a tolerable treatment regimen for bladder preservation, as demonstrated by the excellent treatment compliance and similar FACT measurements.
AB - Objectives To assess, in a Phase I study, whether bladder preservation with concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy (RT) influenced patient-reported quality of life (QOL) as determined by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BL). Methods Between January 1998 and March 2002, 24 patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were enrolled, and 23 patients underwent transuretheral resection of bladder tumor, followed by twice-weekly gemcitabine with concurrent RT. The initial dose was 10 mg/m2 given twice weekly and increased as tolerated. To assess treatment-related QOL, patients completed the FACT-BL questionnaire. Results Of the 24 patients enrolled, 23 (96%) were assessed for toxicity and response. The FACT-generic (G) QOL assessment was obtained from 22 (92%) of 23 patients. No statistically significant difference was found in the FACT-G or FACT-BL or the combination before, during, or after treatment. The FACT-BL values were lower in patients who received higher doses of gemcitabine (greater than 20 mg/m2 versus 20 mg/m2 or less). At least one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was experienced by 5 (23%) of 22 patients. The FACT-G values were lower for those patients who experienced DLT (difference of -13.1, P = 0.07). The physical well-being scores for patients who experienced DLT were lower after treatment (difference of -5.2, P = 0.03) compared with those without DLT. Conclusions Concurrent RT and gemcitabine failed to statistically influence patient-reported QOL, although patients who received higher doses reported lower FACT-BL scores. The results of this study suggest that concurrent gemcitabine with conformal RT is a tolerable treatment regimen for bladder preservation, as demonstrated by the excellent treatment compliance and similar FACT measurements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042782476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042782476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.024
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 15245938
AN - SCOPUS:3042782476
VL - 64
SP - 69
EP - 73
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
SN - 0090-4295
IS - 1
ER -