Prospective pilot study of living kidney donor decision-making and outcomes

Benita Walton-Moss, L. Ebony Boulware, Matthew Cooper, Laura Taylor, Kathryn Dane, Marie T. Nolan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In its recent report on organ donation, the Institute of Medicine has recommended rigorous studies of how living organ donors make the decision to donate. In this pilot study, 65 donor applicants were interviewed while being evaluated in the outpatient donor clinic and 20 were surveyed again three months after donation. Fifteen and six of these subjects were surveyed again in six and 12months respectively. Several strategies for retaining donors in a prospective longitudinal study are discussed. Half of the donors indicated that the decision to donate was a shared family decision. Married donors were slightly more likely than non-married donors to involve another family member in this decision. Several donors made practical recommendations for improved education of donors during what many perceived to be a very lengthy evaluation process. Some subjects recommended more discussion about post-operative pain and the expected pace of recovery after discharge. Others spoke of the challenge of completing basic homemaking tasks when the donor and recipient were in the same nuclear family. We are continuing to explore these and other aspects of donor decision-making and outcomes and have expanded our sample to include non-donors in the post-evaluation period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-93
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Ethics
  • Organ procurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective pilot study of living kidney donor decision-making and outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this