TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective Development and Validation of the Computerized Adaptive Screen for Suicidal Youth
AU - King, Cheryl A.
AU - Brent, David
AU - Grupp-Phelan, Jacqueline
AU - Casper, T. Charles
AU - Dean, J. Michael
AU - Chernick, Lauren S.
AU - Fein, Joel A.
AU - Mahabee-Gittens, E. Melinda
AU - Patel, Shilpa J.
AU - Mistry, Rakesh D.
AU - Duffy, Susan
AU - Melzer-Lange, Marlene
AU - Rogers, Alexander
AU - Cohen, Daniel M.
AU - Keller, Allison
AU - Shenoi, Rohit
AU - Hickey, Robert W.
AU - Rea, Margaret
AU - Cwik, Mary
AU - Page, Kent
AU - McGuire, Taylor C.
AU - Wang, Jiebiao
AU - Gibbons, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health for the Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide (ED-STARS) study (grant U01 MH104311 [Drs King, Brent, and Grupp-Phelan]). It was also supported in part by the Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, and Emergency Medical Services for Children Network Development Demonstration Program under cooperative agreements U03MC00008, U03MC00001, U03MC00003, U03MC00006, U03MC00007, U03MC22684, U03MC28845, H3MC26201, and U03MC22685.
Funding Information:
founder of Adaptive Testing Technologies, which distributes the Computerized Adaptive Test— Mental Health suite of computerized adaptive tests (CAT-MH™ is a trademark of Adaptive Testing Technologies); the terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of Chicago in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. Dr King reported grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and is a member of the National Advisory Mental Health Council during the conduct of the study. Dr King also reported being a member of the scientific council of the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr King has copyright work and associated materials are being directly licensed to end users via University of Michigan Office of Technology Transfer and received royalties from Guilford Press. Dr Brent reported royalties from eRT, UpToDate, and Guilford Press; personal fees from Healthwise for consultation and Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation; and grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Once Upon A Time Foundation, and Beckwith Institute outside the submitted work. Dr Casper reported grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and Health Resources and Services Administration during the conduct of the study. Drs Dean, Patel, Cohen, and Page reported grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Fein reported grants from the National Institute of Mental Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Mahabee-Gittens reported grants from National Institutes of Health, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Emergency Medical Services for Children Network Development Demonstration Program, and Health Resources and Services Administration during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from the National Institutes of Health and American Academy of Pediatrics, Ohio Chapter, outside the submitted work. Dr Duffy reported grants from the National Institute of Mental Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Rogers reported grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and Health Resources and Services Administration during the conduct of the study. Dr Shenoi reported grants from the National Institute of Mental Health during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Importance: The rate of suicide among adolescents is rising in the US, yet many adolescents at risk are unidentified and receive no mental health services. Objective: To develop and independently validate a novel computerized adaptive screen for suicidal youth (CASSY) for use as a universal screen for suicide risk in medical emergency departments (EDs). Design, Setting, and Participants: Study 1 of this prognostic study prospectively enrolled adolescent patients at 13 geographically diverse US EDs in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. They completed a baseline suicide risk survey and participated in 3-month telephone follow-ups. Using 3 fixed Ask Suicide-Screening Questions items as anchors and additional items that varied in number and content across individuals, we derived algorithms for the CASSY. In study 2, data were collected from patients at 14 Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network EDs and 1 Indian Health Service hospital. Algorithms were independently validated in a prospective cohort of adolescent patients who also participated in 3-month telephone follow-ups. Adolescents aged 12 to 17 years were consecutively approached during randomly assigned shifts. Exposures: Presentation at an ED. Main Outcome and Measure: A suicide attempt between ED visit and 3-month follow-up, measured via patient and/or parent report. Results: The study 1 CASSY derivation sample included 2075 adolescents (1307 female adolescents [63.0%]; mean [SD] age, 15.1 [1.61] years) with 3-month follow-ups (72.9% retention [2075 adolescents]). The study 2 validation sample included 2754 adolescents (1711 female adolescents [62.1%]; mean [SD] age, 15.0 [1.65] years), with 3-month follow-ups (69.5% retention [2754 adolescents]). The CASSY algorithms had excellent predictive accuracy for suicide attempt (area under the curve, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.85-0.91]) in study 1. The mean number of adaptively administered items was 11 (range, 5-21). At a specificity of 80%, the CASSY had a sensitivity of 83%. It also demonstrated excellent accuracy in the study 2 validation sample (area under the curve, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.85-0.89]). In this study, the CASSY had a sensitivity of 82.4% for prediction of a suicide attempt at the 80% specificity cutoff established in study 1. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the adaptive and personalized CASSY demonstrated excellent suicide attempt risk recognition, which has the potential to facilitate linkage to services..
AB - Importance: The rate of suicide among adolescents is rising in the US, yet many adolescents at risk are unidentified and receive no mental health services. Objective: To develop and independently validate a novel computerized adaptive screen for suicidal youth (CASSY) for use as a universal screen for suicide risk in medical emergency departments (EDs). Design, Setting, and Participants: Study 1 of this prognostic study prospectively enrolled adolescent patients at 13 geographically diverse US EDs in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. They completed a baseline suicide risk survey and participated in 3-month telephone follow-ups. Using 3 fixed Ask Suicide-Screening Questions items as anchors and additional items that varied in number and content across individuals, we derived algorithms for the CASSY. In study 2, data were collected from patients at 14 Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network EDs and 1 Indian Health Service hospital. Algorithms were independently validated in a prospective cohort of adolescent patients who also participated in 3-month telephone follow-ups. Adolescents aged 12 to 17 years were consecutively approached during randomly assigned shifts. Exposures: Presentation at an ED. Main Outcome and Measure: A suicide attempt between ED visit and 3-month follow-up, measured via patient and/or parent report. Results: The study 1 CASSY derivation sample included 2075 adolescents (1307 female adolescents [63.0%]; mean [SD] age, 15.1 [1.61] years) with 3-month follow-ups (72.9% retention [2075 adolescents]). The study 2 validation sample included 2754 adolescents (1711 female adolescents [62.1%]; mean [SD] age, 15.0 [1.65] years), with 3-month follow-ups (69.5% retention [2754 adolescents]). The CASSY algorithms had excellent predictive accuracy for suicide attempt (area under the curve, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.85-0.91]) in study 1. The mean number of adaptively administered items was 11 (range, 5-21). At a specificity of 80%, the CASSY had a sensitivity of 83%. It also demonstrated excellent accuracy in the study 2 validation sample (area under the curve, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.85-0.89]). In this study, the CASSY had a sensitivity of 82.4% for prediction of a suicide attempt at the 80% specificity cutoff established in study 1. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the adaptive and personalized CASSY demonstrated excellent suicide attempt risk recognition, which has the potential to facilitate linkage to services..
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100645136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100645136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4576
DO - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4576
M3 - Article
C2 - 33533908
AN - SCOPUS:85100645136
SN - 2168-622X
VL - 78
SP - 540
EP - 549
JO - JAMA Psychiatry
JF - JAMA Psychiatry
IS - 5
ER -