Prophylactic mesh for hernia prevention: Has the time arrived?

Sarah S. Fox, Robert Johnson, John P. Fischer, Frederic Eckhauser, William W. Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Incisional and parastomal hernias continue to be vexing problems for patients and surgeons. Risk factors are generally patient-related and/or technical in nature, and in some cases, can be altered, resulting in improved outcomes. Improved fascial closure techniques can only partly reduce the risk of incisional hernia formation. Even under optimal circumstances, using time tested closure techniques and materials, the rate remains high, due primarily to factors that are not modifiable or are unidentifiable. In such cases, there may be a beneficial role for prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA), wherein mesh is implanted at the time of initial surgery or stoma formation. Several high-risk groups that might benefit from PMA have been identified, including patients undergoing open abdominal aneurysm repair or colorectal procedures, obese patients, and patients requiring creation of permanent gastrointestinal or urological stomas. Although the initial results of PMA are promising, the benefits of this strategy must be weighed against potential risks. Outcome measures to assess efficacy should include not only hernia recurrence but also quality of life, surgical-site occurrences, and cost. Further studies are warranted to predict which specific patient populations might benefit most from PMA and to identify ideal mesh materials as well as preferred implantation sites and methods of mesh fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180S-186S
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume142
Issue number3S
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hernia
Aneurysm
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Costs and Cost Analysis
Recurrence
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Prophylactic mesh for hernia prevention : Has the time arrived? / Fox, Sarah S.; Johnson, Robert; Fischer, John P.; Eckhauser, Frederic; Hope, William W.

In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 142, No. 3S, 01.09.2018, p. 180S-186S.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fox, Sarah S. ; Johnson, Robert ; Fischer, John P. ; Eckhauser, Frederic ; Hope, William W. / Prophylactic mesh for hernia prevention : Has the time arrived?. In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 142, No. 3S. pp. 180S-186S.
@article{fc8a67b0d7514c519022c9396fdaceb8,
title = "Prophylactic mesh for hernia prevention: Has the time arrived?",
abstract = "Incisional and parastomal hernias continue to be vexing problems for patients and surgeons. Risk factors are generally patient-related and/or technical in nature, and in some cases, can be altered, resulting in improved outcomes. Improved fascial closure techniques can only partly reduce the risk of incisional hernia formation. Even under optimal circumstances, using time tested closure techniques and materials, the rate remains high, due primarily to factors that are not modifiable or are unidentifiable. In such cases, there may be a beneficial role for prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA), wherein mesh is implanted at the time of initial surgery or stoma formation. Several high-risk groups that might benefit from PMA have been identified, including patients undergoing open abdominal aneurysm repair or colorectal procedures, obese patients, and patients requiring creation of permanent gastrointestinal or urological stomas. Although the initial results of PMA are promising, the benefits of this strategy must be weighed against potential risks. Outcome measures to assess efficacy should include not only hernia recurrence but also quality of life, surgical-site occurrences, and cost. Further studies are warranted to predict which specific patient populations might benefit most from PMA and to identify ideal mesh materials as well as preferred implantation sites and methods of mesh fixation.",
author = "Fox, {Sarah S.} and Robert Johnson and Fischer, {John P.} and Frederic Eckhauser and Hope, {William W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000004876",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "180S--186S",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3S",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prophylactic mesh for hernia prevention

T2 - Has the time arrived?

AU - Fox, Sarah S.

AU - Johnson, Robert

AU - Fischer, John P.

AU - Eckhauser, Frederic

AU - Hope, William W.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Incisional and parastomal hernias continue to be vexing problems for patients and surgeons. Risk factors are generally patient-related and/or technical in nature, and in some cases, can be altered, resulting in improved outcomes. Improved fascial closure techniques can only partly reduce the risk of incisional hernia formation. Even under optimal circumstances, using time tested closure techniques and materials, the rate remains high, due primarily to factors that are not modifiable or are unidentifiable. In such cases, there may be a beneficial role for prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA), wherein mesh is implanted at the time of initial surgery or stoma formation. Several high-risk groups that might benefit from PMA have been identified, including patients undergoing open abdominal aneurysm repair or colorectal procedures, obese patients, and patients requiring creation of permanent gastrointestinal or urological stomas. Although the initial results of PMA are promising, the benefits of this strategy must be weighed against potential risks. Outcome measures to assess efficacy should include not only hernia recurrence but also quality of life, surgical-site occurrences, and cost. Further studies are warranted to predict which specific patient populations might benefit most from PMA and to identify ideal mesh materials as well as preferred implantation sites and methods of mesh fixation.

AB - Incisional and parastomal hernias continue to be vexing problems for patients and surgeons. Risk factors are generally patient-related and/or technical in nature, and in some cases, can be altered, resulting in improved outcomes. Improved fascial closure techniques can only partly reduce the risk of incisional hernia formation. Even under optimal circumstances, using time tested closure techniques and materials, the rate remains high, due primarily to factors that are not modifiable or are unidentifiable. In such cases, there may be a beneficial role for prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA), wherein mesh is implanted at the time of initial surgery or stoma formation. Several high-risk groups that might benefit from PMA have been identified, including patients undergoing open abdominal aneurysm repair or colorectal procedures, obese patients, and patients requiring creation of permanent gastrointestinal or urological stomas. Although the initial results of PMA are promising, the benefits of this strategy must be weighed against potential risks. Outcome measures to assess efficacy should include not only hernia recurrence but also quality of life, surgical-site occurrences, and cost. Further studies are warranted to predict which specific patient populations might benefit most from PMA and to identify ideal mesh materials as well as preferred implantation sites and methods of mesh fixation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061121554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061121554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004876

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004876

M3 - Article

C2 - 30138288

AN - SCOPUS:85061121554

VL - 142

SP - 180S-186S

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 3S

ER -