Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems

Peter Briss, Barbara Rimer, Barbara Reilley, Ralph C. Coates, Nancy C. Lee, Patricia Mullen, Phaedra Corso, Angela B. Hutchinson, Robert Hiatt, Jon Kerner, Prethibha George, Cornelia White, Nisha Gandhi, Mona Saraiya, Rosalind Breslow, George Isham, Steven M. Teutsch, Alan R. Hinman, Robert S Lawrence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Individuals are increasingly involved in decisions about their health care. Shared decision making (SDM), an intervention in the clinical setting in which patients and providers collaborate in decision making, is an important approach for informing patients and involving them in their health care. However, SDM cannot bear the entire burden for informing and involving individuals. Population-oriented interventions to promote informed decision making (IDM) should also be explored. This review provides a conceptual background for population-oriented interventions to promote informed decisions (IDM interventions), followed by a systematic review of studies of IDM interventions to promote cancer screening. This review specifically asked whether IDM interventions (1) promote understanding of cancer screening, (2) facilitate participation in decision making about cancer screening at a level that is comfortable for individuals; or (3) encourage individuals to make cancer-screening decisions that are consistent with their preferences and values. Fifteen intervention arms met the intervention definition. They used small media, counseling, small-group education, provider-oriented strategies, or combinations of these to promote IDM. The interventions were generally consistent in improving individuals' knowledge about the disease, accuracy of risk perceptions, or knowledge and beliefs about the pros and cons of screening and treatment options. However, few studies evaluated whether these interventions resulted in individuals participating in decision making at a desirable level, or whether they led to decisions that were consistent with individuals' values and preferences. More research is needed on how best to promote and facilitate individuals' participation in health care. Work is especially needed on how to facilitate participation at a level desired by individuals, how to promote decisions by patients that are consistent with their preferences and values, how to perform effective and cost-effective IDM interventions for healthcare systems and providers and in community settings (outside of clinical settings), and how to implement these interventions in diverse populations (such as populations that are older, nonwhite, or disadvantaged). Finally, work is needed on the presence and magnitude of barriers to and harms of IDM interventions and how they might be avoided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-80
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Community Health Services
Early Detection of Cancer
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
Population
Vulnerable Populations
Health Personnel
Counseling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. / Briss, Peter; Rimer, Barbara; Reilley, Barbara; Coates, Ralph C.; Lee, Nancy C.; Mullen, Patricia; Corso, Phaedra; Hutchinson, Angela B.; Hiatt, Robert; Kerner, Jon; George, Prethibha; White, Cornelia; Gandhi, Nisha; Saraiya, Mona; Breslow, Rosalind; Isham, George; Teutsch, Steven M.; Hinman, Alan R.; Lawrence, Robert S.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 67-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Briss, P, Rimer, B, Reilley, B, Coates, RC, Lee, NC, Mullen, P, Corso, P, Hutchinson, AB, Hiatt, R, Kerner, J, George, P, White, C, Gandhi, N, Saraiya, M, Breslow, R, Isham, G, Teutsch, SM, Hinman, AR & Lawrence, RS 2004, 'Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.012
Briss, Peter ; Rimer, Barbara ; Reilley, Barbara ; Coates, Ralph C. ; Lee, Nancy C. ; Mullen, Patricia ; Corso, Phaedra ; Hutchinson, Angela B. ; Hiatt, Robert ; Kerner, Jon ; George, Prethibha ; White, Cornelia ; Gandhi, Nisha ; Saraiya, Mona ; Breslow, Rosalind ; Isham, George ; Teutsch, Steven M. ; Hinman, Alan R. ; Lawrence, Robert S. / Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 67-80.
@article{73b4e0f444c540af8bcfdbf453e8696e,
title = "Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems",
abstract = "Individuals are increasingly involved in decisions about their health care. Shared decision making (SDM), an intervention in the clinical setting in which patients and providers collaborate in decision making, is an important approach for informing patients and involving them in their health care. However, SDM cannot bear the entire burden for informing and involving individuals. Population-oriented interventions to promote informed decision making (IDM) should also be explored. This review provides a conceptual background for population-oriented interventions to promote informed decisions (IDM interventions), followed by a systematic review of studies of IDM interventions to promote cancer screening. This review specifically asked whether IDM interventions (1) promote understanding of cancer screening, (2) facilitate participation in decision making about cancer screening at a level that is comfortable for individuals; or (3) encourage individuals to make cancer-screening decisions that are consistent with their preferences and values. Fifteen intervention arms met the intervention definition. They used small media, counseling, small-group education, provider-oriented strategies, or combinations of these to promote IDM. The interventions were generally consistent in improving individuals' knowledge about the disease, accuracy of risk perceptions, or knowledge and beliefs about the pros and cons of screening and treatment options. However, few studies evaluated whether these interventions resulted in individuals participating in decision making at a desirable level, or whether they led to decisions that were consistent with individuals' values and preferences. More research is needed on how best to promote and facilitate individuals' participation in health care. Work is especially needed on how to facilitate participation at a level desired by individuals, how to promote decisions by patients that are consistent with their preferences and values, how to perform effective and cost-effective IDM interventions for healthcare systems and providers and in community settings (outside of clinical settings), and how to implement these interventions in diverse populations (such as populations that are older, nonwhite, or disadvantaged). Finally, work is needed on the presence and magnitude of barriers to and harms of IDM interventions and how they might be avoided.",
author = "Peter Briss and Barbara Rimer and Barbara Reilley and Coates, {Ralph C.} and Lee, {Nancy C.} and Patricia Mullen and Phaedra Corso and Hutchinson, {Angela B.} and Robert Hiatt and Jon Kerner and Prethibha George and Cornelia White and Nisha Gandhi and Mona Saraiya and Rosalind Breslow and George Isham and Teutsch, {Steven M.} and Hinman, {Alan R.} and Lawrence, {Robert S}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "67--80",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems

AU - Briss, Peter

AU - Rimer, Barbara

AU - Reilley, Barbara

AU - Coates, Ralph C.

AU - Lee, Nancy C.

AU - Mullen, Patricia

AU - Corso, Phaedra

AU - Hutchinson, Angela B.

AU - Hiatt, Robert

AU - Kerner, Jon

AU - George, Prethibha

AU - White, Cornelia

AU - Gandhi, Nisha

AU - Saraiya, Mona

AU - Breslow, Rosalind

AU - Isham, George

AU - Teutsch, Steven M.

AU - Hinman, Alan R.

AU - Lawrence, Robert S

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Individuals are increasingly involved in decisions about their health care. Shared decision making (SDM), an intervention in the clinical setting in which patients and providers collaborate in decision making, is an important approach for informing patients and involving them in their health care. However, SDM cannot bear the entire burden for informing and involving individuals. Population-oriented interventions to promote informed decision making (IDM) should also be explored. This review provides a conceptual background for population-oriented interventions to promote informed decisions (IDM interventions), followed by a systematic review of studies of IDM interventions to promote cancer screening. This review specifically asked whether IDM interventions (1) promote understanding of cancer screening, (2) facilitate participation in decision making about cancer screening at a level that is comfortable for individuals; or (3) encourage individuals to make cancer-screening decisions that are consistent with their preferences and values. Fifteen intervention arms met the intervention definition. They used small media, counseling, small-group education, provider-oriented strategies, or combinations of these to promote IDM. The interventions were generally consistent in improving individuals' knowledge about the disease, accuracy of risk perceptions, or knowledge and beliefs about the pros and cons of screening and treatment options. However, few studies evaluated whether these interventions resulted in individuals participating in decision making at a desirable level, or whether they led to decisions that were consistent with individuals' values and preferences. More research is needed on how best to promote and facilitate individuals' participation in health care. Work is especially needed on how to facilitate participation at a level desired by individuals, how to promote decisions by patients that are consistent with their preferences and values, how to perform effective and cost-effective IDM interventions for healthcare systems and providers and in community settings (outside of clinical settings), and how to implement these interventions in diverse populations (such as populations that are older, nonwhite, or disadvantaged). Finally, work is needed on the presence and magnitude of barriers to and harms of IDM interventions and how they might be avoided.

AB - Individuals are increasingly involved in decisions about their health care. Shared decision making (SDM), an intervention in the clinical setting in which patients and providers collaborate in decision making, is an important approach for informing patients and involving them in their health care. However, SDM cannot bear the entire burden for informing and involving individuals. Population-oriented interventions to promote informed decision making (IDM) should also be explored. This review provides a conceptual background for population-oriented interventions to promote informed decisions (IDM interventions), followed by a systematic review of studies of IDM interventions to promote cancer screening. This review specifically asked whether IDM interventions (1) promote understanding of cancer screening, (2) facilitate participation in decision making about cancer screening at a level that is comfortable for individuals; or (3) encourage individuals to make cancer-screening decisions that are consistent with their preferences and values. Fifteen intervention arms met the intervention definition. They used small media, counseling, small-group education, provider-oriented strategies, or combinations of these to promote IDM. The interventions were generally consistent in improving individuals' knowledge about the disease, accuracy of risk perceptions, or knowledge and beliefs about the pros and cons of screening and treatment options. However, few studies evaluated whether these interventions resulted in individuals participating in decision making at a desirable level, or whether they led to decisions that were consistent with individuals' values and preferences. More research is needed on how best to promote and facilitate individuals' participation in health care. Work is especially needed on how to facilitate participation at a level desired by individuals, how to promote decisions by patients that are consistent with their preferences and values, how to perform effective and cost-effective IDM interventions for healthcare systems and providers and in community settings (outside of clinical settings), and how to implement these interventions in diverse populations (such as populations that are older, nonwhite, or disadvantaged). Finally, work is needed on the presence and magnitude of barriers to and harms of IDM interventions and how they might be avoided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9144234428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9144234428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.012

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 14700715

AN - SCOPUS:9144234428

VL - 26

SP - 67

EP - 80

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 1

ER -