Promoting informed choice: Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making

Steven H. Woolf, Evelyn C Y Chan, Russell Harris, Stacey L. Sheridan, Clarence H. Braddock, Robert M. Kaplan, Alex Krist, Annette M. O'Connor, Sean Tunis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ours is an era in which patients seek greater engagement in health care choices, increasing the demand for high-quality information about clinical options. Providing support for informed choice is not straightforward, however, because of challenges faced by clinicians, health systems, and consumers. Greater use of written or electronic tools can help to clarify choices for patients, but decision aids cannot replace the human element in facilitating informed choice. The ideal solution is to couple information with high-quality decision counseling to help patients understand the potential risks, benefits, and uncertainties of clinical options and to assist them in selecting the option that best accommodates their personal preferences. Decision counseling can be offered by 3 types of providers: clinicians who lack formal informed-choice training ("usual care"), clinicians with formal informed-choice training, or trained third parties who function as impartial decision counselors. Controlled studies are needed to determine which model is best, but none appears to be ideal. The health care system cannot truly support informed decision making without correcting the underlying obstacles that impede patient access to needed information. New information technology solutions, training programs, and reimbursement schemes are necessary. Patient demand for guidance will only increase as clinical options multiply and the world of information continues its rapid growth. Today's health care system is unprepared for the convergence of these 2 burgeoning domains, and the need to address systemic deficiencies will grow more urgent over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-300
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume143
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 16 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
Counseling
Access to Information
Decision Support Techniques
Uncertainty
Technology
Education
Health
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Woolf, S. H., Chan, E. C. Y., Harris, R., Sheridan, S. L., Braddock, C. H., Kaplan, R. M., ... Tunis, S. (2005). Promoting informed choice: Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(4), 293-300.

Promoting informed choice : Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. / Woolf, Steven H.; Chan, Evelyn C Y; Harris, Russell; Sheridan, Stacey L.; Braddock, Clarence H.; Kaplan, Robert M.; Krist, Alex; O'Connor, Annette M.; Tunis, Sean.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 143, No. 4, 16.08.2005, p. 293-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woolf, SH, Chan, ECY, Harris, R, Sheridan, SL, Braddock, CH, Kaplan, RM, Krist, A, O'Connor, AM & Tunis, S 2005, 'Promoting informed choice: Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making', Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 293-300.
Woolf SH, Chan ECY, Harris R, Sheridan SL, Braddock CH, Kaplan RM et al. Promoting informed choice: Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2005 Aug 16;143(4):293-300.
Woolf, Steven H. ; Chan, Evelyn C Y ; Harris, Russell ; Sheridan, Stacey L. ; Braddock, Clarence H. ; Kaplan, Robert M. ; Krist, Alex ; O'Connor, Annette M. ; Tunis, Sean. / Promoting informed choice : Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. In: Annals of Internal Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 143, No. 4. pp. 293-300.
@article{773548107ea44e7583853f93adaf8048,
title = "Promoting informed choice: Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making",
abstract = "Ours is an era in which patients seek greater engagement in health care choices, increasing the demand for high-quality information about clinical options. Providing support for informed choice is not straightforward, however, because of challenges faced by clinicians, health systems, and consumers. Greater use of written or electronic tools can help to clarify choices for patients, but decision aids cannot replace the human element in facilitating informed choice. The ideal solution is to couple information with high-quality decision counseling to help patients understand the potential risks, benefits, and uncertainties of clinical options and to assist them in selecting the option that best accommodates their personal preferences. Decision counseling can be offered by 3 types of providers: clinicians who lack formal informed-choice training ({"}usual care{"}), clinicians with formal informed-choice training, or trained third parties who function as impartial decision counselors. Controlled studies are needed to determine which model is best, but none appears to be ideal. The health care system cannot truly support informed decision making without correcting the underlying obstacles that impede patient access to needed information. New information technology solutions, training programs, and reimbursement schemes are necessary. Patient demand for guidance will only increase as clinical options multiply and the world of information continues its rapid growth. Today's health care system is unprepared for the convergence of these 2 burgeoning domains, and the need to address systemic deficiencies will grow more urgent over time.",
author = "Woolf, {Steven H.} and Chan, {Evelyn C Y} and Russell Harris and Sheridan, {Stacey L.} and Braddock, {Clarence H.} and Kaplan, {Robert M.} and Alex Krist and O'Connor, {Annette M.} and Sean Tunis",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "16",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
pages = "293--300",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting informed choice

T2 - Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making

AU - Woolf, Steven H.

AU - Chan, Evelyn C Y

AU - Harris, Russell

AU - Sheridan, Stacey L.

AU - Braddock, Clarence H.

AU - Kaplan, Robert M.

AU - Krist, Alex

AU - O'Connor, Annette M.

AU - Tunis, Sean

PY - 2005/8/16

Y1 - 2005/8/16

N2 - Ours is an era in which patients seek greater engagement in health care choices, increasing the demand for high-quality information about clinical options. Providing support for informed choice is not straightforward, however, because of challenges faced by clinicians, health systems, and consumers. Greater use of written or electronic tools can help to clarify choices for patients, but decision aids cannot replace the human element in facilitating informed choice. The ideal solution is to couple information with high-quality decision counseling to help patients understand the potential risks, benefits, and uncertainties of clinical options and to assist them in selecting the option that best accommodates their personal preferences. Decision counseling can be offered by 3 types of providers: clinicians who lack formal informed-choice training ("usual care"), clinicians with formal informed-choice training, or trained third parties who function as impartial decision counselors. Controlled studies are needed to determine which model is best, but none appears to be ideal. The health care system cannot truly support informed decision making without correcting the underlying obstacles that impede patient access to needed information. New information technology solutions, training programs, and reimbursement schemes are necessary. Patient demand for guidance will only increase as clinical options multiply and the world of information continues its rapid growth. Today's health care system is unprepared for the convergence of these 2 burgeoning domains, and the need to address systemic deficiencies will grow more urgent over time.

AB - Ours is an era in which patients seek greater engagement in health care choices, increasing the demand for high-quality information about clinical options. Providing support for informed choice is not straightforward, however, because of challenges faced by clinicians, health systems, and consumers. Greater use of written or electronic tools can help to clarify choices for patients, but decision aids cannot replace the human element in facilitating informed choice. The ideal solution is to couple information with high-quality decision counseling to help patients understand the potential risks, benefits, and uncertainties of clinical options and to assist them in selecting the option that best accommodates their personal preferences. Decision counseling can be offered by 3 types of providers: clinicians who lack formal informed-choice training ("usual care"), clinicians with formal informed-choice training, or trained third parties who function as impartial decision counselors. Controlled studies are needed to determine which model is best, but none appears to be ideal. The health care system cannot truly support informed decision making without correcting the underlying obstacles that impede patient access to needed information. New information technology solutions, training programs, and reimbursement schemes are necessary. Patient demand for guidance will only increase as clinical options multiply and the world of information continues its rapid growth. Today's health care system is unprepared for the convergence of these 2 burgeoning domains, and the need to address systemic deficiencies will grow more urgent over time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23644446633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23644446633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16103473

AN - SCOPUS:23644446633

VL - 143

SP - 293

EP - 300

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 4

ER -