Promoting engagement by patients and families to reduce adverse events in acute care settings: A systematic review

Zackary Berger, Tabor E. Flickinger, Elizabeth Pfoh, Kathryn A. Martinez, Sydney E Dy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-centeredness is central to healthcare. Hospitals should address patients' unique needs to improve safety and quality. Patient engagement in healthcare, which may help prevent adverse events, can be approached as an independent patient safety practice (PSP) or as part of a multifactorial PSP. Objectives: This review examines how interventions encouraging this engagement have been implemented in controlled trials. Methods: We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane from 2000 to 2012 for English language studies in hospital settings with prospective controlled designs, addressing the effectiveness or implementation of patient/family engagement in PSPs. We separately reviewed interventions implemented as part of selected broader PSPs by way of example: hand hygiene, ventilator-associated pneumonia, rapid response systems and care transitions. Results: Six articles met the inclusion criteria for effectiveness with a primary focus on patient engagement. We identified 12 studies implementing patient engagement as an aspect of selected broader PSPs. A number of studies relied on patients' possible function as a reporter of error to healthcare workers and patients as a source of reminders regarding safety behaviours, while others relied on direct activation of patients or families. Definitions of patient and family engagement were lacking, as well as evidence regarding the types of patients who might feel comfortable engaging with providers, and in what contexts. Conclusions: While patient engagement in safety is appealing, there is insufficient high-quality evidence informing real-world implementation. Further work should evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on patient and family engagement and clarify the added benefit of incorporating engagement in multifaceted approaches to improve patient safety endpoints. In addition, strategies to assess and overcome barriers to patients' willingness to actively engage in their care should be investigated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)548-555
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
Patient Safety
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Hand Hygiene
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Patient Transfer
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Promoting engagement by patients and families to reduce adverse events in acute care settings : A systematic review. / Berger, Zackary; Flickinger, Tabor E.; Pfoh, Elizabeth; Martinez, Kathryn A.; Dy, Sydney E.

In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 23, No. 7, 2014, p. 548-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc8959dd5d354952b1a046546a2953ff,
title = "Promoting engagement by patients and families to reduce adverse events in acute care settings: A systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: Patient-centeredness is central to healthcare. Hospitals should address patients' unique needs to improve safety and quality. Patient engagement in healthcare, which may help prevent adverse events, can be approached as an independent patient safety practice (PSP) or as part of a multifactorial PSP. Objectives: This review examines how interventions encouraging this engagement have been implemented in controlled trials. Methods: We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane from 2000 to 2012 for English language studies in hospital settings with prospective controlled designs, addressing the effectiveness or implementation of patient/family engagement in PSPs. We separately reviewed interventions implemented as part of selected broader PSPs by way of example: hand hygiene, ventilator-associated pneumonia, rapid response systems and care transitions. Results: Six articles met the inclusion criteria for effectiveness with a primary focus on patient engagement. We identified 12 studies implementing patient engagement as an aspect of selected broader PSPs. A number of studies relied on patients' possible function as a reporter of error to healthcare workers and patients as a source of reminders regarding safety behaviours, while others relied on direct activation of patients or families. Definitions of patient and family engagement were lacking, as well as evidence regarding the types of patients who might feel comfortable engaging with providers, and in what contexts. Conclusions: While patient engagement in safety is appealing, there is insufficient high-quality evidence informing real-world implementation. Further work should evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on patient and family engagement and clarify the added benefit of incorporating engagement in multifaceted approaches to improve patient safety endpoints. In addition, strategies to assess and overcome barriers to patients' willingness to actively engage in their care should be investigated.",
author = "Zackary Berger and Flickinger, {Tabor E.} and Elizabeth Pfoh and Martinez, {Kathryn A.} and Dy, {Sydney E}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001769",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "548--555",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting engagement by patients and families to reduce adverse events in acute care settings

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Berger, Zackary

AU - Flickinger, Tabor E.

AU - Pfoh, Elizabeth

AU - Martinez, Kathryn A.

AU - Dy, Sydney E

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Introduction: Patient-centeredness is central to healthcare. Hospitals should address patients' unique needs to improve safety and quality. Patient engagement in healthcare, which may help prevent adverse events, can be approached as an independent patient safety practice (PSP) or as part of a multifactorial PSP. Objectives: This review examines how interventions encouraging this engagement have been implemented in controlled trials. Methods: We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane from 2000 to 2012 for English language studies in hospital settings with prospective controlled designs, addressing the effectiveness or implementation of patient/family engagement in PSPs. We separately reviewed interventions implemented as part of selected broader PSPs by way of example: hand hygiene, ventilator-associated pneumonia, rapid response systems and care transitions. Results: Six articles met the inclusion criteria for effectiveness with a primary focus on patient engagement. We identified 12 studies implementing patient engagement as an aspect of selected broader PSPs. A number of studies relied on patients' possible function as a reporter of error to healthcare workers and patients as a source of reminders regarding safety behaviours, while others relied on direct activation of patients or families. Definitions of patient and family engagement were lacking, as well as evidence regarding the types of patients who might feel comfortable engaging with providers, and in what contexts. Conclusions: While patient engagement in safety is appealing, there is insufficient high-quality evidence informing real-world implementation. Further work should evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on patient and family engagement and clarify the added benefit of incorporating engagement in multifaceted approaches to improve patient safety endpoints. In addition, strategies to assess and overcome barriers to patients' willingness to actively engage in their care should be investigated.

AB - Introduction: Patient-centeredness is central to healthcare. Hospitals should address patients' unique needs to improve safety and quality. Patient engagement in healthcare, which may help prevent adverse events, can be approached as an independent patient safety practice (PSP) or as part of a multifactorial PSP. Objectives: This review examines how interventions encouraging this engagement have been implemented in controlled trials. Methods: We searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane from 2000 to 2012 for English language studies in hospital settings with prospective controlled designs, addressing the effectiveness or implementation of patient/family engagement in PSPs. We separately reviewed interventions implemented as part of selected broader PSPs by way of example: hand hygiene, ventilator-associated pneumonia, rapid response systems and care transitions. Results: Six articles met the inclusion criteria for effectiveness with a primary focus on patient engagement. We identified 12 studies implementing patient engagement as an aspect of selected broader PSPs. A number of studies relied on patients' possible function as a reporter of error to healthcare workers and patients as a source of reminders regarding safety behaviours, while others relied on direct activation of patients or families. Definitions of patient and family engagement were lacking, as well as evidence regarding the types of patients who might feel comfortable engaging with providers, and in what contexts. Conclusions: While patient engagement in safety is appealing, there is insufficient high-quality evidence informing real-world implementation. Further work should evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on patient and family engagement and clarify the added benefit of incorporating engagement in multifaceted approaches to improve patient safety endpoints. In addition, strategies to assess and overcome barriers to patients' willingness to actively engage in their care should be investigated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902530575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902530575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001769

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001769

M3 - Article

C2 - 24336575

AN - SCOPUS:84902530575

VL - 23

SP - 548

EP - 555

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 7

ER -