Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation

Sara Neelon, D. T. Duncan, T. Burgoine, M. Mayhew, A. Platt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Policies supporting breastfeeding vary by state, but little is known about the geographical aspects of this variation. This study describes state breastfeeding licensing and administrative regulations targeting child care settings, compares regulations with national standards, and examines the spatial patterning and clustering of these regulations throughout the United States (US). We compared regulations for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) with national standards for: (1) general breastfeeding support; (2) designated place for breastfeeding; (3) no solids before infants are four months of age; and (4) no formula for breastfed infants without parent permission. We scored state regulations as 0 = standard not addressed, 1 = standard partially addressed, and 2 = standard fully addressed. We considered each regulation individually, and also summed scores to provide an overall rating of regulations by state. We mapped regulations using geographic information systems technology, and explored overall and local spatial autocorrelation using global and local variants of Moran’s I. Five states had regulations for centers and two for homes that addressed all four standards. Mean regulation scores were 0.35, 0.20, 0.98, 0.74 for centers, and 0.17, 0.15, 0.79, 0.58 for homes. Local Moran’s I revealed that New York and Pennsylvania had substantially stronger regulations than their adjacent states, while Florida had weaker regulations than its neighbors. Overall, few states had regulations that met breastfeeding standards. We identified some patterns of spatial correlation, suggesting avenues for future research to better understand distributions of regulations across the US.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)745-754
Number of pages10
JournalMaternal and Child Health Journal
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Child Care
Breast Feeding
Geographic Information Systems
Infant Formula
Spatial Analysis
Licensure
Cluster Analysis
Technology

Keywords

  • Breastfeeding
  • Child care
  • Policy
  • Regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation. / Neelon, Sara; Duncan, D. T.; Burgoine, T.; Mayhew, M.; Platt, A.

In: Maternal and Child Health Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2015, p. 745-754.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neelon, Sara ; Duncan, D. T. ; Burgoine, T. ; Mayhew, M. ; Platt, A. / Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation. In: Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 745-754.
@article{7c2df2fe1f2c4dfdb22fa467d1959c5b,
title = "Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation",
abstract = "Policies supporting breastfeeding vary by state, but little is known about the geographical aspects of this variation. This study describes state breastfeeding licensing and administrative regulations targeting child care settings, compares regulations with national standards, and examines the spatial patterning and clustering of these regulations throughout the United States (US). We compared regulations for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) with national standards for: (1) general breastfeeding support; (2) designated place for breastfeeding; (3) no solids before infants are four months of age; and (4) no formula for breastfed infants without parent permission. We scored state regulations as 0 = standard not addressed, 1 = standard partially addressed, and 2 = standard fully addressed. We considered each regulation individually, and also summed scores to provide an overall rating of regulations by state. We mapped regulations using geographic information systems technology, and explored overall and local spatial autocorrelation using global and local variants of Moran’s I. Five states had regulations for centers and two for homes that addressed all four standards. Mean regulation scores were 0.35, 0.20, 0.98, 0.74 for centers, and 0.17, 0.15, 0.79, 0.58 for homes. Local Moran’s I revealed that New York and Pennsylvania had substantially stronger regulations than their adjacent states, while Florida had weaker regulations than its neighbors. Overall, few states had regulations that met breastfeeding standards. We identified some patterns of spatial correlation, suggesting avenues for future research to better understand distributions of regulations across the US.",
keywords = "Breastfeeding, Child care, Policy, Regulation",
author = "Sara Neelon and Duncan, {D. T.} and T. Burgoine and M. Mayhew and A. Platt",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s10995-014-1560-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "745--754",
journal = "Maternal and Child Health Journal",
issn = "1092-7875",
publisher = "Springer GmbH & Co, Auslieferungs-Gesellschaf",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting Breastfeeding in Child Care Through State Regulation

AU - Neelon, Sara

AU - Duncan, D. T.

AU - Burgoine, T.

AU - Mayhew, M.

AU - Platt, A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Policies supporting breastfeeding vary by state, but little is known about the geographical aspects of this variation. This study describes state breastfeeding licensing and administrative regulations targeting child care settings, compares regulations with national standards, and examines the spatial patterning and clustering of these regulations throughout the United States (US). We compared regulations for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) with national standards for: (1) general breastfeeding support; (2) designated place for breastfeeding; (3) no solids before infants are four months of age; and (4) no formula for breastfed infants without parent permission. We scored state regulations as 0 = standard not addressed, 1 = standard partially addressed, and 2 = standard fully addressed. We considered each regulation individually, and also summed scores to provide an overall rating of regulations by state. We mapped regulations using geographic information systems technology, and explored overall and local spatial autocorrelation using global and local variants of Moran’s I. Five states had regulations for centers and two for homes that addressed all four standards. Mean regulation scores were 0.35, 0.20, 0.98, 0.74 for centers, and 0.17, 0.15, 0.79, 0.58 for homes. Local Moran’s I revealed that New York and Pennsylvania had substantially stronger regulations than their adjacent states, while Florida had weaker regulations than its neighbors. Overall, few states had regulations that met breastfeeding standards. We identified some patterns of spatial correlation, suggesting avenues for future research to better understand distributions of regulations across the US.

AB - Policies supporting breastfeeding vary by state, but little is known about the geographical aspects of this variation. This study describes state breastfeeding licensing and administrative regulations targeting child care settings, compares regulations with national standards, and examines the spatial patterning and clustering of these regulations throughout the United States (US). We compared regulations for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) with national standards for: (1) general breastfeeding support; (2) designated place for breastfeeding; (3) no solids before infants are four months of age; and (4) no formula for breastfed infants without parent permission. We scored state regulations as 0 = standard not addressed, 1 = standard partially addressed, and 2 = standard fully addressed. We considered each regulation individually, and also summed scores to provide an overall rating of regulations by state. We mapped regulations using geographic information systems technology, and explored overall and local spatial autocorrelation using global and local variants of Moran’s I. Five states had regulations for centers and two for homes that addressed all four standards. Mean regulation scores were 0.35, 0.20, 0.98, 0.74 for centers, and 0.17, 0.15, 0.79, 0.58 for homes. Local Moran’s I revealed that New York and Pennsylvania had substantially stronger regulations than their adjacent states, while Florida had weaker regulations than its neighbors. Overall, few states had regulations that met breastfeeding standards. We identified some patterns of spatial correlation, suggesting avenues for future research to better understand distributions of regulations across the US.

KW - Breastfeeding

KW - Child care

KW - Policy

KW - Regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939886864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939886864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10995-014-1560-6

DO - 10.1007/s10995-014-1560-6

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 745

EP - 754

JO - Maternal and Child Health Journal

JF - Maternal and Child Health Journal

SN - 1092-7875

IS - 4

ER -