Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007

Amy Berrington De González, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Kwang Pyo Kim, Mythreyi Bhargavan, Rebecca Lewis, Fred Mettler, Charles Land

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The use of computed tomographic (CT) scans in the United States (US) has increased more than 3-fold since 1993 to approximately 70 million scans annually. Despite the great medical benefits, there is concern about the potential radiation-related cancer risk. We conducted detailed estimates of the future cancer risks from current CT scan use in the US according to age, sex, and scan type. Methods: Risk models based on the National Research Council's "Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation" report and organ-specific radiation doses derived from a national survey were used to estimate age-specific cancer risks for each scan type. These models were combined with age- and sex-specific scan frequencies for the US in 2007 obtained from survey and insurance claims data. We estimated the mean number of radiationrelated incident cancers with 95% uncertainty limits (UL) using Monte Carlo simulations. Results: Overall, we estimated that approximately 29 000 (95% UL, 15 000-45 000) future cancers could be related to CT scans performed in the US in 2007. The largest contributions were from scans of the abdomen and pelvis (n = 14 000) (95% UL, 6900-25 000), chest (n=4100) (95% UL, 1900-8100), and head (n=4000) (95% UL, 1100-8700), as well as from chest CT angiography (n=2700) (95% UL, 1300-5000). One-third of the projected cancers were due to scans performed at the ages of 35 to 54 years compared with 15% due to scans performed at ages younger than 18 years, and 66% were in females. Conclusions: These detailed estimates highlight several areas of CT scan use that make large contributions to the total cancer risk, including several scan types and age groups with a high frequency of use or scans involving relatively high doses, in which risk-reduction efforts may be warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2071-2077
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume169
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 14 2009

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Neoplasms
Thorax
Radiation
Risk Reduction Behavior
Ionizing Radiation
Insurance
Pelvis
Abdomen
Angiography
Age Groups
Head
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Berrington De González, A., Mahesh, M., Kim, K. P., Bhargavan, M., Lewis, R., Mettler, F., & Land, C. (2009). Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(22), 2071-2077. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440

Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007. / Berrington De González, Amy; Mahesh, Mahadevappa; Kim, Kwang Pyo; Bhargavan, Mythreyi; Lewis, Rebecca; Mettler, Fred; Land, Charles.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 169, No. 22, 14.12.2009, p. 2071-2077.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berrington De González, A, Mahesh, M, Kim, KP, Bhargavan, M, Lewis, R, Mettler, F & Land, C 2009, 'Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007', Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, no. 22, pp. 2071-2077. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440
Berrington De González, Amy ; Mahesh, Mahadevappa ; Kim, Kwang Pyo ; Bhargavan, Mythreyi ; Lewis, Rebecca ; Mettler, Fred ; Land, Charles. / Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007. In: Archives of Internal Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 169, No. 22. pp. 2071-2077.
@article{d4f13d5873b4437ab70a0296f6f21edf,
title = "Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007",
abstract = "Background: The use of computed tomographic (CT) scans in the United States (US) has increased more than 3-fold since 1993 to approximately 70 million scans annually. Despite the great medical benefits, there is concern about the potential radiation-related cancer risk. We conducted detailed estimates of the future cancer risks from current CT scan use in the US according to age, sex, and scan type. Methods: Risk models based on the National Research Council's {"}Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation{"} report and organ-specific radiation doses derived from a national survey were used to estimate age-specific cancer risks for each scan type. These models were combined with age- and sex-specific scan frequencies for the US in 2007 obtained from survey and insurance claims data. We estimated the mean number of radiationrelated incident cancers with 95{\%} uncertainty limits (UL) using Monte Carlo simulations. Results: Overall, we estimated that approximately 29 000 (95{\%} UL, 15 000-45 000) future cancers could be related to CT scans performed in the US in 2007. The largest contributions were from scans of the abdomen and pelvis (n = 14 000) (95{\%} UL, 6900-25 000), chest (n=4100) (95{\%} UL, 1900-8100), and head (n=4000) (95{\%} UL, 1100-8700), as well as from chest CT angiography (n=2700) (95{\%} UL, 1300-5000). One-third of the projected cancers were due to scans performed at the ages of 35 to 54 years compared with 15{\%} due to scans performed at ages younger than 18 years, and 66{\%} were in females. Conclusions: These detailed estimates highlight several areas of CT scan use that make large contributions to the total cancer risk, including several scan types and age groups with a high frequency of use or scans involving relatively high doses, in which risk-reduction efforts may be warranted.",
author = "{Berrington De Gonz{\'a}lez}, Amy and Mahadevappa Mahesh and Kim, {Kwang Pyo} and Mythreyi Bhargavan and Rebecca Lewis and Fred Mettler and Charles Land",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "169",
pages = "2071--2077",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Projected Cancer Risks from Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007

AU - Berrington De González, Amy

AU - Mahesh, Mahadevappa

AU - Kim, Kwang Pyo

AU - Bhargavan, Mythreyi

AU - Lewis, Rebecca

AU - Mettler, Fred

AU - Land, Charles

PY - 2009/12/14

Y1 - 2009/12/14

N2 - Background: The use of computed tomographic (CT) scans in the United States (US) has increased more than 3-fold since 1993 to approximately 70 million scans annually. Despite the great medical benefits, there is concern about the potential radiation-related cancer risk. We conducted detailed estimates of the future cancer risks from current CT scan use in the US according to age, sex, and scan type. Methods: Risk models based on the National Research Council's "Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation" report and organ-specific radiation doses derived from a national survey were used to estimate age-specific cancer risks for each scan type. These models were combined with age- and sex-specific scan frequencies for the US in 2007 obtained from survey and insurance claims data. We estimated the mean number of radiationrelated incident cancers with 95% uncertainty limits (UL) using Monte Carlo simulations. Results: Overall, we estimated that approximately 29 000 (95% UL, 15 000-45 000) future cancers could be related to CT scans performed in the US in 2007. The largest contributions were from scans of the abdomen and pelvis (n = 14 000) (95% UL, 6900-25 000), chest (n=4100) (95% UL, 1900-8100), and head (n=4000) (95% UL, 1100-8700), as well as from chest CT angiography (n=2700) (95% UL, 1300-5000). One-third of the projected cancers were due to scans performed at the ages of 35 to 54 years compared with 15% due to scans performed at ages younger than 18 years, and 66% were in females. Conclusions: These detailed estimates highlight several areas of CT scan use that make large contributions to the total cancer risk, including several scan types and age groups with a high frequency of use or scans involving relatively high doses, in which risk-reduction efforts may be warranted.

AB - Background: The use of computed tomographic (CT) scans in the United States (US) has increased more than 3-fold since 1993 to approximately 70 million scans annually. Despite the great medical benefits, there is concern about the potential radiation-related cancer risk. We conducted detailed estimates of the future cancer risks from current CT scan use in the US according to age, sex, and scan type. Methods: Risk models based on the National Research Council's "Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation" report and organ-specific radiation doses derived from a national survey were used to estimate age-specific cancer risks for each scan type. These models were combined with age- and sex-specific scan frequencies for the US in 2007 obtained from survey and insurance claims data. We estimated the mean number of radiationrelated incident cancers with 95% uncertainty limits (UL) using Monte Carlo simulations. Results: Overall, we estimated that approximately 29 000 (95% UL, 15 000-45 000) future cancers could be related to CT scans performed in the US in 2007. The largest contributions were from scans of the abdomen and pelvis (n = 14 000) (95% UL, 6900-25 000), chest (n=4100) (95% UL, 1900-8100), and head (n=4000) (95% UL, 1100-8700), as well as from chest CT angiography (n=2700) (95% UL, 1300-5000). One-third of the projected cancers were due to scans performed at the ages of 35 to 54 years compared with 15% due to scans performed at ages younger than 18 years, and 66% were in females. Conclusions: These detailed estimates highlight several areas of CT scan use that make large contributions to the total cancer risk, including several scan types and age groups with a high frequency of use or scans involving relatively high doses, in which risk-reduction efforts may be warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73149113560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73149113560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440

DO - 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440

M3 - Article

C2 - 20008689

AN - SCOPUS:73149113560

VL - 169

SP - 2071

EP - 2077

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 22

ER -