Prognostic value of psychological testing in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation

A prospective study

Richard B. North, David H. Kidd, Robert L. Wimberly, David Edwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Associations between psychological and physical states are understood to exist, and the development of standardized psychological tests has allowed quantitative evaluation of this relationship. We tested whether associations exist between psychological test instruments and patients selected for therapeutic trials of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic, intractable pain. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients selected for SCS were tested prospectively with a battery of standardized psychological tests: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory with Wiggins content scales, Symptom Check List-90, and Derogatis Affects Balance Scale. Associations between treatment outcomes and preoperative test scores and clinical variables were tested by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, in which the dependent variables were as follows: 1) the outcome of a therapeutic trial of stimulation (whether the patient derived sufficient reported pain relief with a temporary electrode to proceed with a permanent implant), and 2) long-term outcome of treatment with the permanent implant, as determined by disinterested third-party interview. RESULTS: Significant associations (P ≤ 0.01) were observed between the outcome of the therapeutic trial of stimulation and psychological test results; patients with low 'anxiety' scores on the Derogatis Affects Balance Scale and with high 'organic symptoms' scores on the Wiggins test were significantly more likely to proceed to permanent implants, as determined by multivariate statistical models. There was an elevation in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory hypochondriasis scale in these patients by univariate (P = 0.02), but not by multivariate, models. The multivariate model also identified young age, reproduction of leg pain by straight leg raising, and bilateral leg pain as favorable prognostic factors. The only association with favorable long- term outcome of implantation of a permanent device, by univariate analysis, was an elevated 'joy' score on the Derogatis Affects Balance Scale. Multivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant predictors of long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: Because our study population was selected on the basis of recognized prognostic factors and long clinical experience, it may not be possible to generalize our findings to the overall pain clinic referral population. In the subpopulation we have chosen for SCS trials, psychological testing is of modest value and explains little of the observed variance in outcome. We find little evidence for selecting patients for SCS on the basis of psychological testing. Because self-reported outcome measures may themselves reflect the patient's psychological state, these findings should be considered carefully, in overall clinical context. A prospective study with additional objective outcome measures is underway, which will address some of these issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-311
Number of pages11
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1996

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Stimulation
Psychological Tests
Prospective Studies
Psychology
Leg
MMPI
Pain
Multivariate Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Hypochondriasis
Pain Clinics
Intractable Pain
Statistical Models
Chronic Pain
Population
Reproduction
Electrodes
Therapeutics
Referral and Consultation
Anxiety

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Psychological testing
  • Spinal cord stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Prognostic value of psychological testing in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation : A prospective study. / North, Richard B.; Kidd, David H.; Wimberly, Robert L.; Edwin, David.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 39, No. 2, 08.1996, p. 301-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

North, Richard B. ; Kidd, David H. ; Wimberly, Robert L. ; Edwin, David. / Prognostic value of psychological testing in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation : A prospective study. In: Neurosurgery. 1996 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 301-311.
@article{fd5100e889d5445697dca73a76e18a10,
title = "Prognostic value of psychological testing in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation: A prospective study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Associations between psychological and physical states are understood to exist, and the development of standardized psychological tests has allowed quantitative evaluation of this relationship. We tested whether associations exist between psychological test instruments and patients selected for therapeutic trials of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic, intractable pain. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients selected for SCS were tested prospectively with a battery of standardized psychological tests: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory with Wiggins content scales, Symptom Check List-90, and Derogatis Affects Balance Scale. Associations between treatment outcomes and preoperative test scores and clinical variables were tested by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, in which the dependent variables were as follows: 1) the outcome of a therapeutic trial of stimulation (whether the patient derived sufficient reported pain relief with a temporary electrode to proceed with a permanent implant), and 2) long-term outcome of treatment with the permanent implant, as determined by disinterested third-party interview. RESULTS: Significant associations (P ≤ 0.01) were observed between the outcome of the therapeutic trial of stimulation and psychological test results; patients with low 'anxiety' scores on the Derogatis Affects Balance Scale and with high 'organic symptoms' scores on the Wiggins test were significantly more likely to proceed to permanent implants, as determined by multivariate statistical models. There was an elevation in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory hypochondriasis scale in these patients by univariate (P = 0.02), but not by multivariate, models. The multivariate model also identified young age, reproduction of leg pain by straight leg raising, and bilateral leg pain as favorable prognostic factors. The only association with favorable long- term outcome of implantation of a permanent device, by univariate analysis, was an elevated 'joy' score on the Derogatis Affects Balance Scale. Multivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant predictors of long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: Because our study population was selected on the basis of recognized prognostic factors and long clinical experience, it may not be possible to generalize our findings to the overall pain clinic referral population. In the subpopulation we have chosen for SCS trials, psychological testing is of modest value and explains little of the observed variance in outcome. We find little evidence for selecting patients for SCS on the basis of psychological testing. Because self-reported outcome measures may themselves reflect the patient's psychological state, these findings should be considered carefully, in overall clinical context. A prospective study with additional objective outcome measures is underway, which will address some of these issues.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Electrical stimulation, Psychological testing, Spinal cord stimulation",
author = "North, {Richard B.} and Kidd, {David H.} and Wimberly, {Robert L.} and David Edwin",
year = "1996",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/00006123-199608000-00013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "301--311",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic value of psychological testing in patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation

T2 - A prospective study

AU - North, Richard B.

AU - Kidd, David H.

AU - Wimberly, Robert L.

AU - Edwin, David

PY - 1996/8

Y1 - 1996/8

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Associations between psychological and physical states are understood to exist, and the development of standardized psychological tests has allowed quantitative evaluation of this relationship. We tested whether associations exist between psychological test instruments and patients selected for therapeutic trials of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic, intractable pain. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients selected for SCS were tested prospectively with a battery of standardized psychological tests: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory with Wiggins content scales, Symptom Check List-90, and Derogatis Affects Balance Scale. Associations between treatment outcomes and preoperative test scores and clinical variables were tested by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, in which the dependent variables were as follows: 1) the outcome of a therapeutic trial of stimulation (whether the patient derived sufficient reported pain relief with a temporary electrode to proceed with a permanent implant), and 2) long-term outcome of treatment with the permanent implant, as determined by disinterested third-party interview. RESULTS: Significant associations (P ≤ 0.01) were observed between the outcome of the therapeutic trial of stimulation and psychological test results; patients with low 'anxiety' scores on the Derogatis Affects Balance Scale and with high 'organic symptoms' scores on the Wiggins test were significantly more likely to proceed to permanent implants, as determined by multivariate statistical models. There was an elevation in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory hypochondriasis scale in these patients by univariate (P = 0.02), but not by multivariate, models. The multivariate model also identified young age, reproduction of leg pain by straight leg raising, and bilateral leg pain as favorable prognostic factors. The only association with favorable long- term outcome of implantation of a permanent device, by univariate analysis, was an elevated 'joy' score on the Derogatis Affects Balance Scale. Multivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant predictors of long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: Because our study population was selected on the basis of recognized prognostic factors and long clinical experience, it may not be possible to generalize our findings to the overall pain clinic referral population. In the subpopulation we have chosen for SCS trials, psychological testing is of modest value and explains little of the observed variance in outcome. We find little evidence for selecting patients for SCS on the basis of psychological testing. Because self-reported outcome measures may themselves reflect the patient's psychological state, these findings should be considered carefully, in overall clinical context. A prospective study with additional objective outcome measures is underway, which will address some of these issues.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Associations between psychological and physical states are understood to exist, and the development of standardized psychological tests has allowed quantitative evaluation of this relationship. We tested whether associations exist between psychological test instruments and patients selected for therapeutic trials of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic, intractable pain. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients selected for SCS were tested prospectively with a battery of standardized psychological tests: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory with Wiggins content scales, Symptom Check List-90, and Derogatis Affects Balance Scale. Associations between treatment outcomes and preoperative test scores and clinical variables were tested by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, in which the dependent variables were as follows: 1) the outcome of a therapeutic trial of stimulation (whether the patient derived sufficient reported pain relief with a temporary electrode to proceed with a permanent implant), and 2) long-term outcome of treatment with the permanent implant, as determined by disinterested third-party interview. RESULTS: Significant associations (P ≤ 0.01) were observed between the outcome of the therapeutic trial of stimulation and psychological test results; patients with low 'anxiety' scores on the Derogatis Affects Balance Scale and with high 'organic symptoms' scores on the Wiggins test were significantly more likely to proceed to permanent implants, as determined by multivariate statistical models. There was an elevation in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory hypochondriasis scale in these patients by univariate (P = 0.02), but not by multivariate, models. The multivariate model also identified young age, reproduction of leg pain by straight leg raising, and bilateral leg pain as favorable prognostic factors. The only association with favorable long- term outcome of implantation of a permanent device, by univariate analysis, was an elevated 'joy' score on the Derogatis Affects Balance Scale. Multivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant predictors of long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: Because our study population was selected on the basis of recognized prognostic factors and long clinical experience, it may not be possible to generalize our findings to the overall pain clinic referral population. In the subpopulation we have chosen for SCS trials, psychological testing is of modest value and explains little of the observed variance in outcome. We find little evidence for selecting patients for SCS on the basis of psychological testing. Because self-reported outcome measures may themselves reflect the patient's psychological state, these findings should be considered carefully, in overall clinical context. A prospective study with additional objective outcome measures is underway, which will address some of these issues.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Psychological testing

KW - Spinal cord stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030003298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030003298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00006123-199608000-00013

DO - 10.1097/00006123-199608000-00013

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 301

EP - 311

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 2

ER -