TY - JOUR
T1 - Prioritizing the Care of Critically Ill Children in South Africa
T2 - How Does SCREEN Perform against Other Triage Tools?
AU - Hansoti, Bhakti
AU - Hodkinson, Peter
AU - Wallis, Lee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Objective Childhood mortality remains unacceptably high. In low-resource settings, children with critical illness often present for care. Current triage strategies are time consuming and require trained health care workers. To address this limitation, our team developed a simple subjective tool, SCREEN (Sick Children Require Emergency Evaluation Now), which is easy to administer, to identify critically ill children. This article presents the development of the SCREEN program and evaluates its performance when compared with other commonly implemented triage tools in low-resource settings. Methods We measured the sensitivity and specificity of SCREEN, to identify critically ill children, compared with 4 other previously validated triage tools: the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses, the Pediatric Early Warning, the Pediatric South African Triage Scale, and the World Health Organization Emergency Triage Treatment Tool. Findings SCREEN has high sensitivity (100%-98.73%; P < 0.001) and specificity (64.41%-50.71%; P < 0.001) when compared with other validated triage tools. Conclusions The SCREEN tool may offer a simple and effective method to identify critically ill children in low-resource environments.
AB - Objective Childhood mortality remains unacceptably high. In low-resource settings, children with critical illness often present for care. Current triage strategies are time consuming and require trained health care workers. To address this limitation, our team developed a simple subjective tool, SCREEN (Sick Children Require Emergency Evaluation Now), which is easy to administer, to identify critically ill children. This article presents the development of the SCREEN program and evaluates its performance when compared with other commonly implemented triage tools in low-resource settings. Methods We measured the sensitivity and specificity of SCREEN, to identify critically ill children, compared with 4 other previously validated triage tools: the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses, the Pediatric Early Warning, the Pediatric South African Triage Scale, and the World Health Organization Emergency Triage Treatment Tool. Findings SCREEN has high sensitivity (100%-98.73%; P < 0.001) and specificity (64.41%-50.71%; P < 0.001) when compared with other validated triage tools. Conclusions The SCREEN tool may offer a simple and effective method to identify critically ill children in low-resource environments.
KW - IMCI
KW - critical illness
KW - prioritization
KW - triage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015899159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015899159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001107
DO - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001107
M3 - Article
C2 - 28328688
AN - SCOPUS:85015899159
VL - 36
SP - E129-E134
JO - Pediatric Emergency Care
JF - Pediatric Emergency Care
SN - 0749-5161
IS - 3
ER -