Prioritizing the Care of Critically Ill Children in South Africa: How Does SCREEN Perform against Other Triage Tools?

Bhakti Hansoti, Peter Hodkinson, Lee Wallis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective Childhood mortality remains unacceptably high. In low-resource settings, children with critical illness often present for care. Current triage strategies are time consuming and require trained health care workers. To address this limitation, our team developed a simple subjective tool, SCREEN (Sick Children Require Emergency Evaluation Now), which is easy to administer, to identify critically ill children. This article presents the development of the SCREEN program and evaluates its performance when compared with other commonly implemented triage tools in low-resource settings. Methods We measured the sensitivity and specificity of SCREEN, to identify critically ill children, compared with 4 other previously validated triage tools: the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses, the Pediatric Early Warning, the Pediatric South African Triage Scale, and the World Health Organization Emergency Triage Treatment Tool. Findings SCREEN has high sensitivity (100%-98.73%; P < 0.001) and specificity (64.41%-50.71%; P < 0.001) when compared with other validated triage tools. Conclusions The SCREEN tool may offer a simple and effective method to identify critically ill children in low-resource environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E129-E134
JournalPediatric emergency care
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

Keywords

  • IMCI
  • critical illness
  • prioritization
  • triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prioritizing the Care of Critically Ill Children in South Africa: How Does SCREEN Perform against Other Triage Tools?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this