Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

Govind Persad, Alan Wertheimer, Ezekiel J. Emanuel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Allocation of very scarce medical interventions such as organs and vaccines is a persistent ethical challenge. We evaluate eight simple allocation principles that can be classified into four categories: treating people equally, favouring the worst-off, maximising total benefits, and promoting and rewarding social usefulness. No single principle is sufficient to incorporate all morally relevant considerations and therefore individual principles must be combined into multiprinciple allocation systems. We evaluate three systems: the United Network for Organ Sharing points systems, quality-adjusted life-years, and disability-adjusted life-years. We recommend an alternative system-the complete lives system-which prioritises younger people who have not yet lived a complete life, and also incorporates prognosis, save the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value principles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-431
Number of pages9
JournalThe Lancet
Volume373
Issue number9661
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 30 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Persad, G., Wertheimer, A., & Emanuel, E. J. (2009). Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. The Lancet, 373(9661), 423-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60137-9