Primary care physicians' experiences with case finding for practice-based care management

Tobias Freund, Michel Wensing, Stefan Geissler, Frank Peters-Klimm, Cornelia Mahler, Cynthia Boyd, Joachim Szecsenyi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The identification of patients most likely to benefit from care management programs-case finding-is a crucial determinant of their effectiveness regarding improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Until now, research has mainly focused on claims data-based case finding. This study aimed to explore how primary care physicians (PCPs) select patients for practicebased care management and how risk prediction may complement their case finding. Study Design: Qualitative study. Methods: We performed 12 semi-structured interviews with PCPs from 10 small- to middle-sized primary care practices in Germany. The interviews focused on their criteria for selecting patients as potential participants in an on-site care management program and how PCPs evaluate claims data-based risk prediction as a case-finding tool. All interviews were transcribed verbatim. We performed qualitative content analysis using the ATLAS.ti software. Results: Three major categories emerged from the physicians interviewed: 1) the physicians' interpretation of the program's eligibility criteria, 2) physician-related criteria, and 3) patient-related criteria. The physician-related criteria included "sympathy/aversion" and "knowing the patient." Patient-related criteria concerned care sensitivity in terms of "willingness to participate," "ability to participate (eg, sufficient language skills, cognitive status)," and "manageable care needs." PCPs believed that their case finding could be supported by additional information from claims data-based risk prediction. Conclusions: Case finding for care management programs in primary care may benefit from a structured approach combining clinical judgment by PCPs and claims data-based risk modeling. However, further research is needed to identify the optimal case-finding strategy for practicebased care management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume18
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Primary Care Physicians
Physicians
Interviews
Primary Health Care
Patient Care Management
Aptitude
Case Management
Research
Germany
Language
Software
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Freund, T., Wensing, M., Geissler, S., Peters-Klimm, F., Mahler, C., Boyd, C., & Szecsenyi, J. (2012). Primary care physicians' experiences with case finding for practice-based care management. American Journal of Managed Care, 18(4).

Primary care physicians' experiences with case finding for practice-based care management. / Freund, Tobias; Wensing, Michel; Geissler, Stefan; Peters-Klimm, Frank; Mahler, Cornelia; Boyd, Cynthia; Szecsenyi, Joachim.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 18, No. 4, 04.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freund, T, Wensing, M, Geissler, S, Peters-Klimm, F, Mahler, C, Boyd, C & Szecsenyi, J 2012, 'Primary care physicians' experiences with case finding for practice-based care management', American Journal of Managed Care, vol. 18, no. 4.
Freund, Tobias ; Wensing, Michel ; Geissler, Stefan ; Peters-Klimm, Frank ; Mahler, Cornelia ; Boyd, Cynthia ; Szecsenyi, Joachim. / Primary care physicians' experiences with case finding for practice-based care management. In: American Journal of Managed Care. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 4.
@article{fe70cdf42c584858ac29fd72b5cf4e32,
title = "Primary care physicians' experiences with case finding for practice-based care management",
abstract = "Objectives: The identification of patients most likely to benefit from care management programs-case finding-is a crucial determinant of their effectiveness regarding improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Until now, research has mainly focused on claims data-based case finding. This study aimed to explore how primary care physicians (PCPs) select patients for practicebased care management and how risk prediction may complement their case finding. Study Design: Qualitative study. Methods: We performed 12 semi-structured interviews with PCPs from 10 small- to middle-sized primary care practices in Germany. The interviews focused on their criteria for selecting patients as potential participants in an on-site care management program and how PCPs evaluate claims data-based risk prediction as a case-finding tool. All interviews were transcribed verbatim. We performed qualitative content analysis using the ATLAS.ti software. Results: Three major categories emerged from the physicians interviewed: 1) the physicians' interpretation of the program's eligibility criteria, 2) physician-related criteria, and 3) patient-related criteria. The physician-related criteria included {"}sympathy/aversion{"} and {"}knowing the patient.{"} Patient-related criteria concerned care sensitivity in terms of {"}willingness to participate,{"} {"}ability to participate (eg, sufficient language skills, cognitive status),{"} and {"}manageable care needs.{"} PCPs believed that their case finding could be supported by additional information from claims data-based risk prediction. Conclusions: Case finding for care management programs in primary care may benefit from a structured approach combining clinical judgment by PCPs and claims data-based risk modeling. However, further research is needed to identify the optimal case-finding strategy for practicebased care management.",
author = "Tobias Freund and Michel Wensing and Stefan Geissler and Frank Peters-Klimm and Cornelia Mahler and Cynthia Boyd and Joachim Szecsenyi",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care physicians' experiences with case finding for practice-based care management

AU - Freund, Tobias

AU - Wensing, Michel

AU - Geissler, Stefan

AU - Peters-Klimm, Frank

AU - Mahler, Cornelia

AU - Boyd, Cynthia

AU - Szecsenyi, Joachim

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Objectives: The identification of patients most likely to benefit from care management programs-case finding-is a crucial determinant of their effectiveness regarding improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Until now, research has mainly focused on claims data-based case finding. This study aimed to explore how primary care physicians (PCPs) select patients for practicebased care management and how risk prediction may complement their case finding. Study Design: Qualitative study. Methods: We performed 12 semi-structured interviews with PCPs from 10 small- to middle-sized primary care practices in Germany. The interviews focused on their criteria for selecting patients as potential participants in an on-site care management program and how PCPs evaluate claims data-based risk prediction as a case-finding tool. All interviews were transcribed verbatim. We performed qualitative content analysis using the ATLAS.ti software. Results: Three major categories emerged from the physicians interviewed: 1) the physicians' interpretation of the program's eligibility criteria, 2) physician-related criteria, and 3) patient-related criteria. The physician-related criteria included "sympathy/aversion" and "knowing the patient." Patient-related criteria concerned care sensitivity in terms of "willingness to participate," "ability to participate (eg, sufficient language skills, cognitive status)," and "manageable care needs." PCPs believed that their case finding could be supported by additional information from claims data-based risk prediction. Conclusions: Case finding for care management programs in primary care may benefit from a structured approach combining clinical judgment by PCPs and claims data-based risk modeling. However, further research is needed to identify the optimal case-finding strategy for practicebased care management.

AB - Objectives: The identification of patients most likely to benefit from care management programs-case finding-is a crucial determinant of their effectiveness regarding improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Until now, research has mainly focused on claims data-based case finding. This study aimed to explore how primary care physicians (PCPs) select patients for practicebased care management and how risk prediction may complement their case finding. Study Design: Qualitative study. Methods: We performed 12 semi-structured interviews with PCPs from 10 small- to middle-sized primary care practices in Germany. The interviews focused on their criteria for selecting patients as potential participants in an on-site care management program and how PCPs evaluate claims data-based risk prediction as a case-finding tool. All interviews were transcribed verbatim. We performed qualitative content analysis using the ATLAS.ti software. Results: Three major categories emerged from the physicians interviewed: 1) the physicians' interpretation of the program's eligibility criteria, 2) physician-related criteria, and 3) patient-related criteria. The physician-related criteria included "sympathy/aversion" and "knowing the patient." Patient-related criteria concerned care sensitivity in terms of "willingness to participate," "ability to participate (eg, sufficient language skills, cognitive status)," and "manageable care needs." PCPs believed that their case finding could be supported by additional information from claims data-based risk prediction. Conclusions: Case finding for care management programs in primary care may benefit from a structured approach combining clinical judgment by PCPs and claims data-based risk modeling. However, further research is needed to identify the optimal case-finding strategy for practicebased care management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860767843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860767843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 4

ER -