Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors: A 5-year longitudinal study

Claire Snyder, Craig C. Earle, Robert J. Herbert, Bridget A. Neville, Amanda L. Blackford, Kevin Frick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the mix of physician specialties that long-term survivors visit and how the mix relates to preventive care. Patients and Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study of stage I to III Medicare fee-for-service colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in 1997. We examined physician visits and preventive care each year for 5 years, starting 366 days postdiagnosis, and how preventive service receipt related to the physician mix seen: primary care provider (PCP) only, oncologist only, both, or neither. Results: A total of 1,541 patients met the eligibility criteria (mean age, 76; 43% male; 85% white). During 5 years, PCP visits increased from a mean of 4.2 to 4.7 (P <.0001), and oncology visits decreased from 1.3 to 0.5 (P <.0001). Survivor care by PCPs only increased from 44% to 62%, whereas shared care by PCPs and oncologists dropped from 37% to 21% (P <.0001). Survivors who saw both PCPs and oncologists were most likely to receive influenza vaccination, mammograms, and cervical cancer screening; survivors who saw PCPs only were most likely to receive cholesterol screening and bone densitometry. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with increased influenza vaccination, mammograms, and cervical cancer screening (P <.05). Over time, there was a decrease in mammography and cervical cancer screening and an increase in influenza vaccination (P <.05). Conclusion: As oncologists become less involved in survivor care, cancer-related screening decreases significantly. These results support the need for survivorship care plans that explicitly outline the roles of PCPs and oncologists in sharing care for cancer survivors, and how these roles may change over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1073-1079
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume26
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

Preventive Medicine
Longitudinal Studies
Survivors
Colorectal Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Human Influenza
Vaccination
Medicare
Physicians
Primary Health Care
Fee-for-Service Plans
Densitometry
Mammography
Social Class
Epidemiology
Survival Rate
Retrospective Studies
Cholesterol
Oncologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors : A 5-year longitudinal study. / Snyder, Claire; Earle, Craig C.; Herbert, Robert J.; Neville, Bridget A.; Blackford, Amanda L.; Frick, Kevin.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 26, No. 7, 01.03.2008, p. 1073-1079.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Snyder, Claire ; Earle, Craig C. ; Herbert, Robert J. ; Neville, Bridget A. ; Blackford, Amanda L. ; Frick, Kevin. / Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors : A 5-year longitudinal study. In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2008 ; Vol. 26, No. 7. pp. 1073-1079.
@article{564359e7752e43a485bc97905ddf3cd4,
title = "Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors: A 5-year longitudinal study",
abstract = "Purpose: To explore the mix of physician specialties that long-term survivors visit and how the mix relates to preventive care. Patients and Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study of stage I to III Medicare fee-for-service colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in 1997. We examined physician visits and preventive care each year for 5 years, starting 366 days postdiagnosis, and how preventive service receipt related to the physician mix seen: primary care provider (PCP) only, oncologist only, both, or neither. Results: A total of 1,541 patients met the eligibility criteria (mean age, 76; 43{\%} male; 85{\%} white). During 5 years, PCP visits increased from a mean of 4.2 to 4.7 (P <.0001), and oncology visits decreased from 1.3 to 0.5 (P <.0001). Survivor care by PCPs only increased from 44{\%} to 62{\%}, whereas shared care by PCPs and oncologists dropped from 37{\%} to 21{\%} (P <.0001). Survivors who saw both PCPs and oncologists were most likely to receive influenza vaccination, mammograms, and cervical cancer screening; survivors who saw PCPs only were most likely to receive cholesterol screening and bone densitometry. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with increased influenza vaccination, mammograms, and cervical cancer screening (P <.05). Over time, there was a decrease in mammography and cervical cancer screening and an increase in influenza vaccination (P <.05). Conclusion: As oncologists become less involved in survivor care, cancer-related screening decreases significantly. These results support the need for survivorship care plans that explicitly outline the roles of PCPs and oncologists in sharing care for cancer survivors, and how these roles may change over time.",
author = "Claire Snyder and Earle, {Craig C.} and Herbert, {Robert J.} and Neville, {Bridget A.} and Blackford, {Amanda L.} and Kevin Frick",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2007.11.9859",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1073--1079",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors

T2 - A 5-year longitudinal study

AU - Snyder, Claire

AU - Earle, Craig C.

AU - Herbert, Robert J.

AU - Neville, Bridget A.

AU - Blackford, Amanda L.

AU - Frick, Kevin

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Purpose: To explore the mix of physician specialties that long-term survivors visit and how the mix relates to preventive care. Patients and Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study of stage I to III Medicare fee-for-service colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in 1997. We examined physician visits and preventive care each year for 5 years, starting 366 days postdiagnosis, and how preventive service receipt related to the physician mix seen: primary care provider (PCP) only, oncologist only, both, or neither. Results: A total of 1,541 patients met the eligibility criteria (mean age, 76; 43% male; 85% white). During 5 years, PCP visits increased from a mean of 4.2 to 4.7 (P <.0001), and oncology visits decreased from 1.3 to 0.5 (P <.0001). Survivor care by PCPs only increased from 44% to 62%, whereas shared care by PCPs and oncologists dropped from 37% to 21% (P <.0001). Survivors who saw both PCPs and oncologists were most likely to receive influenza vaccination, mammograms, and cervical cancer screening; survivors who saw PCPs only were most likely to receive cholesterol screening and bone densitometry. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with increased influenza vaccination, mammograms, and cervical cancer screening (P <.05). Over time, there was a decrease in mammography and cervical cancer screening and an increase in influenza vaccination (P <.05). Conclusion: As oncologists become less involved in survivor care, cancer-related screening decreases significantly. These results support the need for survivorship care plans that explicitly outline the roles of PCPs and oncologists in sharing care for cancer survivors, and how these roles may change over time.

AB - Purpose: To explore the mix of physician specialties that long-term survivors visit and how the mix relates to preventive care. Patients and Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study of stage I to III Medicare fee-for-service colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in 1997. We examined physician visits and preventive care each year for 5 years, starting 366 days postdiagnosis, and how preventive service receipt related to the physician mix seen: primary care provider (PCP) only, oncologist only, both, or neither. Results: A total of 1,541 patients met the eligibility criteria (mean age, 76; 43% male; 85% white). During 5 years, PCP visits increased from a mean of 4.2 to 4.7 (P <.0001), and oncology visits decreased from 1.3 to 0.5 (P <.0001). Survivor care by PCPs only increased from 44% to 62%, whereas shared care by PCPs and oncologists dropped from 37% to 21% (P <.0001). Survivors who saw both PCPs and oncologists were most likely to receive influenza vaccination, mammograms, and cervical cancer screening; survivors who saw PCPs only were most likely to receive cholesterol screening and bone densitometry. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with increased influenza vaccination, mammograms, and cervical cancer screening (P <.05). Over time, there was a decrease in mammography and cervical cancer screening and an increase in influenza vaccination (P <.05). Conclusion: As oncologists become less involved in survivor care, cancer-related screening decreases significantly. These results support the need for survivorship care plans that explicitly outline the roles of PCPs and oncologists in sharing care for cancer survivors, and how these roles may change over time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41949089424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41949089424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.9859

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.9859

M3 - Article

C2 - 18309941

AN - SCOPUS:41949089424

VL - 26

SP - 1073

EP - 1079

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 7

ER -