Prevention of emesis after strabismus repair in children: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized comparison of droperidol versus ondansetron

Ronald S. Litman, Christopher L. Wu, Andrew Lee, Jonathan D. Griswold, Rodney Voisine, Candace Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ondansetron with droperidol in preventing postoperative emesis in children after strabismus repair. Design: Randomized, double-blind study. Patients and Setting: 57 ASA physical status I and II children aged 3 to 14 years, undergoing outpatient strabismus repair in two separate study centers. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either 0.15 mg/kg intravenous (IV) ondansetron or 0.075 mg/kg IV droperidol shortly after induction of anesthesia. Measurements and Main Results: Number of episodes of emesis and times to discharge from the recovery room and ambulatory center were assessed. Twenty-nine (94%) of 31 children who received ondansetron and 21 (81%) of 26 children who received droperidol were emesis-free (p = NS). There were no significant differences in the number of episodes of emesis on the day after surgery or times to discharge. Conclusions: Ondansetron is at least as effective as droperidol in reducing the frequency of emesis in children after strabismus repair, and it did not shorten times to discharge home. The low number of patients in our study may have masked a difference in effect between the two groups. The clinician should decide whether the increased cost of ondansetron justifies its use over other antiemetics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-62
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1995

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Anesthesia, outpatient, pediatric
  • antiemetics, droperidol, ondansetron
  • serotonin antagonists
  • surgery, strabismus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this