Prevention and Management Following Complications from Endourology Procedures

Jean Nicolas Cornu, Thomas Herrmann, Olivier Traxer, Brian Matlaga

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Context Endourologic procedures are very common in daily urologic practice for treatment of benign prostatic obstruction, stone disease, urothelial tumors, or stenosis. Objective To characterize the complications following endoscopic procedures, to describe their management, and to gather information about their prevention in current urologic practice. Evidence acquisition A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/Medline database to include the most relevant articles on the topic. The search focused on endoscopic approaches for treatment of prostate, bladder, or upper urinary tract disease. Percutaneous approaches and noninvasive extracorporeal techniques were excluded. Complications of endourologic procedures were identified through level 1 evidence, systematic reviews of the literature, or original articles assessing complications as the primary end point. Data about management and prevention of each type of complication were retrieved in a second round using specific keywords. Evidence synthesis Complications of endoscopic urologic procedures are specific to each surgical approach. Main complications after prostate surgery include transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome, bleeding and transfusion, acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection, clot retention, postoperative irritative symptoms, ejaculatory dysfunction, urinary incontinence, bladder neck contracture, and urethral stricture. Major complications after transurethral bladder tumor include severe bleeding, transfusion, bladder perforation, and urinary tract infection. The most frequent complications after ureteroscopy are fever and sepsis, bleeding, steinstrasse, and ureteral injury. Overall, the literature is very poor, with no systematic reporting of complications and underuse of classification systems. No clear protocols are available for management of complications, and most are based on studies with low levels of evidence. Good clinical practice recommendations and guidelines give useful support about technical issues, intraoperative safety, and prevention of urinary tract infection. The efficacy of these preventive measures remains poorly investigated. Conclusions Complications following endoscopic surgery are potentially numerous and vary with patient characteristics, surgical approach, and type of medical device. Improved standardization and quality of publications are warranted to improve knowledge of these issues, which are directly linked to the level of care. Patient summary We focused on the potential complications of each endoscopic approach used to treat urologic disease. We described the frequency of these complications and gathered information about how to manage them in the operating theater. We also noted caveats for the literature regarding standardization of reporting and classification systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-59
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Urology Focus
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Urinary Tract Infections
Urologic Diseases
Urinary Bladder
Hemorrhage
Prostate
Ureteroscopy
Urethral Stricture
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
Urinary Retention
Urinary Incontinence
Contracture
Practice Guidelines
PubMed
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Publications
Sepsis
Pathologic Constriction
Fever
Databases
Safety

Keywords

  • Bladder resection
  • Complications
  • Endoscopy
  • Prostate
  • Ureteroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Prevention and Management Following Complications from Endourology Procedures. / Cornu, Jean Nicolas; Herrmann, Thomas; Traxer, Olivier; Matlaga, Brian.

In: European Urology Focus, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.04.2016, p. 49-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Cornu, Jean Nicolas ; Herrmann, Thomas ; Traxer, Olivier ; Matlaga, Brian. / Prevention and Management Following Complications from Endourology Procedures. In: European Urology Focus. 2016 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 49-59.
@article{31f4816684684b05919e93a508f5fdaa,
title = "Prevention and Management Following Complications from Endourology Procedures",
abstract = "Context Endourologic procedures are very common in daily urologic practice for treatment of benign prostatic obstruction, stone disease, urothelial tumors, or stenosis. Objective To characterize the complications following endoscopic procedures, to describe their management, and to gather information about their prevention in current urologic practice. Evidence acquisition A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/Medline database to include the most relevant articles on the topic. The search focused on endoscopic approaches for treatment of prostate, bladder, or upper urinary tract disease. Percutaneous approaches and noninvasive extracorporeal techniques were excluded. Complications of endourologic procedures were identified through level 1 evidence, systematic reviews of the literature, or original articles assessing complications as the primary end point. Data about management and prevention of each type of complication were retrieved in a second round using specific keywords. Evidence synthesis Complications of endoscopic urologic procedures are specific to each surgical approach. Main complications after prostate surgery include transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome, bleeding and transfusion, acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection, clot retention, postoperative irritative symptoms, ejaculatory dysfunction, urinary incontinence, bladder neck contracture, and urethral stricture. Major complications after transurethral bladder tumor include severe bleeding, transfusion, bladder perforation, and urinary tract infection. The most frequent complications after ureteroscopy are fever and sepsis, bleeding, steinstrasse, and ureteral injury. Overall, the literature is very poor, with no systematic reporting of complications and underuse of classification systems. No clear protocols are available for management of complications, and most are based on studies with low levels of evidence. Good clinical practice recommendations and guidelines give useful support about technical issues, intraoperative safety, and prevention of urinary tract infection. The efficacy of these preventive measures remains poorly investigated. Conclusions Complications following endoscopic surgery are potentially numerous and vary with patient characteristics, surgical approach, and type of medical device. Improved standardization and quality of publications are warranted to improve knowledge of these issues, which are directly linked to the level of care. Patient summary We focused on the potential complications of each endoscopic approach used to treat urologic disease. We described the frequency of these complications and gathered information about how to manage them in the operating theater. We also noted caveats for the literature regarding standardization of reporting and classification systems.",
keywords = "Bladder resection, Complications, Endoscopy, Prostate, Ureteroscopy",
author = "Cornu, {Jean Nicolas} and Thomas Herrmann and Olivier Traxer and Brian Matlaga",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "49--59",
journal = "European Urology Focus",
issn = "2405-4569",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevention and Management Following Complications from Endourology Procedures

AU - Cornu, Jean Nicolas

AU - Herrmann, Thomas

AU - Traxer, Olivier

AU - Matlaga, Brian

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Context Endourologic procedures are very common in daily urologic practice for treatment of benign prostatic obstruction, stone disease, urothelial tumors, or stenosis. Objective To characterize the complications following endoscopic procedures, to describe their management, and to gather information about their prevention in current urologic practice. Evidence acquisition A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/Medline database to include the most relevant articles on the topic. The search focused on endoscopic approaches for treatment of prostate, bladder, or upper urinary tract disease. Percutaneous approaches and noninvasive extracorporeal techniques were excluded. Complications of endourologic procedures were identified through level 1 evidence, systematic reviews of the literature, or original articles assessing complications as the primary end point. Data about management and prevention of each type of complication were retrieved in a second round using specific keywords. Evidence synthesis Complications of endoscopic urologic procedures are specific to each surgical approach. Main complications after prostate surgery include transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome, bleeding and transfusion, acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection, clot retention, postoperative irritative symptoms, ejaculatory dysfunction, urinary incontinence, bladder neck contracture, and urethral stricture. Major complications after transurethral bladder tumor include severe bleeding, transfusion, bladder perforation, and urinary tract infection. The most frequent complications after ureteroscopy are fever and sepsis, bleeding, steinstrasse, and ureteral injury. Overall, the literature is very poor, with no systematic reporting of complications and underuse of classification systems. No clear protocols are available for management of complications, and most are based on studies with low levels of evidence. Good clinical practice recommendations and guidelines give useful support about technical issues, intraoperative safety, and prevention of urinary tract infection. The efficacy of these preventive measures remains poorly investigated. Conclusions Complications following endoscopic surgery are potentially numerous and vary with patient characteristics, surgical approach, and type of medical device. Improved standardization and quality of publications are warranted to improve knowledge of these issues, which are directly linked to the level of care. Patient summary We focused on the potential complications of each endoscopic approach used to treat urologic disease. We described the frequency of these complications and gathered information about how to manage them in the operating theater. We also noted caveats for the literature regarding standardization of reporting and classification systems.

AB - Context Endourologic procedures are very common in daily urologic practice for treatment of benign prostatic obstruction, stone disease, urothelial tumors, or stenosis. Objective To characterize the complications following endoscopic procedures, to describe their management, and to gather information about their prevention in current urologic practice. Evidence acquisition A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/Medline database to include the most relevant articles on the topic. The search focused on endoscopic approaches for treatment of prostate, bladder, or upper urinary tract disease. Percutaneous approaches and noninvasive extracorporeal techniques were excluded. Complications of endourologic procedures were identified through level 1 evidence, systematic reviews of the literature, or original articles assessing complications as the primary end point. Data about management and prevention of each type of complication were retrieved in a second round using specific keywords. Evidence synthesis Complications of endoscopic urologic procedures are specific to each surgical approach. Main complications after prostate surgery include transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome, bleeding and transfusion, acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection, clot retention, postoperative irritative symptoms, ejaculatory dysfunction, urinary incontinence, bladder neck contracture, and urethral stricture. Major complications after transurethral bladder tumor include severe bleeding, transfusion, bladder perforation, and urinary tract infection. The most frequent complications after ureteroscopy are fever and sepsis, bleeding, steinstrasse, and ureteral injury. Overall, the literature is very poor, with no systematic reporting of complications and underuse of classification systems. No clear protocols are available for management of complications, and most are based on studies with low levels of evidence. Good clinical practice recommendations and guidelines give useful support about technical issues, intraoperative safety, and prevention of urinary tract infection. The efficacy of these preventive measures remains poorly investigated. Conclusions Complications following endoscopic surgery are potentially numerous and vary with patient characteristics, surgical approach, and type of medical device. Improved standardization and quality of publications are warranted to improve knowledge of these issues, which are directly linked to the level of care. Patient summary We focused on the potential complications of each endoscopic approach used to treat urologic disease. We described the frequency of these complications and gathered information about how to manage them in the operating theater. We also noted caveats for the literature regarding standardization of reporting and classification systems.

KW - Bladder resection

KW - Complications

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Prostate

KW - Ureteroscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991619901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991619901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.014

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28723449

AN - SCOPUS:84991619901

VL - 2

SP - 49

EP - 59

JO - European Urology Focus

JF - European Urology Focus

SN - 2405-4569

IS - 1

ER -