Prevalence of mood disorders in a national sample of young American adults

Bruce S. Jonas, Debra Brody, Margaret Roper, William Narrow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Availability of nationally representative mood disorder prevalence estimates in the United States, based on structured psychiatric interviews is limited. This report estimates overall lifetime prevalence of major depressive episode, dysthymia, and bipolar disorder using the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and compares these estimates to the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (ECA) conducted 10 years earlier. Additionally, prevalence estimate breakdowns by selected socio-demographic and health characteristics are investigated. Methods. NHANES III, conducted from 1988 to 1994, is a large nationally representative cross-sectional sample of the United States. A population-based sample of 8,602 men and women 17-39 years of age were eligible to participate, of whom 7,667 (89.1%) completed interviews. Mood disorder assessments came from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) administered as one component of the NHANES III. Results. Lifetime prevalence estimates were assessed for six mood measures: 1) major depressive episode (MDE) 8.6%, 2) major depressive episode with severity (MDE-s) 7.7%, 3) dysthymia 6.2%, 4) MDE-s with dysthymia 3.4%, 5) any bipolar disorder 1.6%, and 6) any mood disorder 11.5%. All estimates except for MDE and MDE-s were significantly higher than comparable ECA estimates. Conclusions. These data provide recent national prevalence estimates. Based on their overall magnitudes, subgroup excesses, and observed increases compared to the ECA, continued monitoring of these estimates is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)618-624
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Volume38
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mood Disorders
mood
Nutrition Surveys
Young Adult
Interviews
Bipolar Disorder
interview
health
nutrition
diagnostic
Psychiatry
monitoring
Appointments and Schedules
examination
Demography
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Bipolar disorder
  • Depression
  • Diagnostic Interview Schedule
  • Dysthymia
  • Mood disorders
  • NHANES III
  • Prevalence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Prevalence of mood disorders in a national sample of young American adults. / Jonas, Bruce S.; Brody, Debra; Roper, Margaret; Narrow, William.

In: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 38, No. 11, 01.11.2003, p. 618-624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jonas, Bruce S. ; Brody, Debra ; Roper, Margaret ; Narrow, William. / Prevalence of mood disorders in a national sample of young American adults. In: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2003 ; Vol. 38, No. 11. pp. 618-624.
@article{9ecfa2ba2bc543b98ae84756fa2b5163,
title = "Prevalence of mood disorders in a national sample of young American adults",
abstract = "Background. Availability of nationally representative mood disorder prevalence estimates in the United States, based on structured psychiatric interviews is limited. This report estimates overall lifetime prevalence of major depressive episode, dysthymia, and bipolar disorder using the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and compares these estimates to the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (ECA) conducted 10 years earlier. Additionally, prevalence estimate breakdowns by selected socio-demographic and health characteristics are investigated. Methods. NHANES III, conducted from 1988 to 1994, is a large nationally representative cross-sectional sample of the United States. A population-based sample of 8,602 men and women 17-39 years of age were eligible to participate, of whom 7,667 (89.1{\%}) completed interviews. Mood disorder assessments came from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) administered as one component of the NHANES III. Results. Lifetime prevalence estimates were assessed for six mood measures: 1) major depressive episode (MDE) 8.6{\%}, 2) major depressive episode with severity (MDE-s) 7.7{\%}, 3) dysthymia 6.2{\%}, 4) MDE-s with dysthymia 3.4{\%}, 5) any bipolar disorder 1.6{\%}, and 6) any mood disorder 11.5{\%}. All estimates except for MDE and MDE-s were significantly higher than comparable ECA estimates. Conclusions. These data provide recent national prevalence estimates. Based on their overall magnitudes, subgroup excesses, and observed increases compared to the ECA, continued monitoring of these estimates is warranted.",
keywords = "Bipolar disorder, Depression, Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Dysthymia, Mood disorders, NHANES III, Prevalence",
author = "Jonas, {Bruce S.} and Debra Brody and Margaret Roper and William Narrow",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00127-003-0682-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "618--624",
journal = "Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology",
issn = "0933-7954",
publisher = "D. Steinkopff-Verlag",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of mood disorders in a national sample of young American adults

AU - Jonas, Bruce S.

AU - Brody, Debra

AU - Roper, Margaret

AU - Narrow, William

PY - 2003/11/1

Y1 - 2003/11/1

N2 - Background. Availability of nationally representative mood disorder prevalence estimates in the United States, based on structured psychiatric interviews is limited. This report estimates overall lifetime prevalence of major depressive episode, dysthymia, and bipolar disorder using the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and compares these estimates to the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (ECA) conducted 10 years earlier. Additionally, prevalence estimate breakdowns by selected socio-demographic and health characteristics are investigated. Methods. NHANES III, conducted from 1988 to 1994, is a large nationally representative cross-sectional sample of the United States. A population-based sample of 8,602 men and women 17-39 years of age were eligible to participate, of whom 7,667 (89.1%) completed interviews. Mood disorder assessments came from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) administered as one component of the NHANES III. Results. Lifetime prevalence estimates were assessed for six mood measures: 1) major depressive episode (MDE) 8.6%, 2) major depressive episode with severity (MDE-s) 7.7%, 3) dysthymia 6.2%, 4) MDE-s with dysthymia 3.4%, 5) any bipolar disorder 1.6%, and 6) any mood disorder 11.5%. All estimates except for MDE and MDE-s were significantly higher than comparable ECA estimates. Conclusions. These data provide recent national prevalence estimates. Based on their overall magnitudes, subgroup excesses, and observed increases compared to the ECA, continued monitoring of these estimates is warranted.

AB - Background. Availability of nationally representative mood disorder prevalence estimates in the United States, based on structured psychiatric interviews is limited. This report estimates overall lifetime prevalence of major depressive episode, dysthymia, and bipolar disorder using the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and compares these estimates to the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (ECA) conducted 10 years earlier. Additionally, prevalence estimate breakdowns by selected socio-demographic and health characteristics are investigated. Methods. NHANES III, conducted from 1988 to 1994, is a large nationally representative cross-sectional sample of the United States. A population-based sample of 8,602 men and women 17-39 years of age were eligible to participate, of whom 7,667 (89.1%) completed interviews. Mood disorder assessments came from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) administered as one component of the NHANES III. Results. Lifetime prevalence estimates were assessed for six mood measures: 1) major depressive episode (MDE) 8.6%, 2) major depressive episode with severity (MDE-s) 7.7%, 3) dysthymia 6.2%, 4) MDE-s with dysthymia 3.4%, 5) any bipolar disorder 1.6%, and 6) any mood disorder 11.5%. All estimates except for MDE and MDE-s were significantly higher than comparable ECA estimates. Conclusions. These data provide recent national prevalence estimates. Based on their overall magnitudes, subgroup excesses, and observed increases compared to the ECA, continued monitoring of these estimates is warranted.

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Depression

KW - Diagnostic Interview Schedule

KW - Dysthymia

KW - Mood disorders

KW - NHANES III

KW - Prevalence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345688678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345688678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00127-003-0682-8

DO - 10.1007/s00127-003-0682-8

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 618

EP - 624

JO - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

JF - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

SN - 0933-7954

IS - 11

ER -