Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in an Employed Population as Determined by Analysis of Three Data Sources

Ronnie Goetzel, Karen Kent, Rachel Mosher Henke, Cory Pack, Malinda D'Arco, Jordana Thomas, James Luckett, Traci Arthur-Hartranft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare estimates of the prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) using various data sources. Methods: We integrated health risk assessment (HRA), claims, and biometric screening data from Lockheed Martin Corporation. We measured the extent to which MetS risk factors measured using HRA and medical claims correlated with biometric screening data. Results: Using biometric data, 24.9% of employees were identified as having MetS. Prevalence estimates were much lower using HRA data (6.8%) and claims (3.7%). Between 2012 and 2014, 10.4% of the sample newly acquired MetS. The number of MetS risk factors per employee was predictive of diabetes, heart disease, health care costs, and utilization. Conclusion: MetS is prevalent and associated with progression to disease. It is more easily tracked with biometric screening data than with HRA or claims data. Employers should consider efforts to manage and prevent this condition in their workforce.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Information Storage and Retrieval
Population
Health
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Health Care Costs
Disease Progression
Heart Diseases
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in an Employed Population as Determined by Analysis of Three Data Sources. / Goetzel, Ronnie; Kent, Karen; Henke, Rachel Mosher; Pack, Cory; D'Arco, Malinda; Thomas, Jordana; Luckett, James; Arthur-Hartranft, Traci.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 59, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 161-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goetzel, Ronnie ; Kent, Karen ; Henke, Rachel Mosher ; Pack, Cory ; D'Arco, Malinda ; Thomas, Jordana ; Luckett, James ; Arthur-Hartranft, Traci. / Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in an Employed Population as Determined by Analysis of Three Data Sources. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 161-168.
@article{0272fae3e362409884d428b8567afe88,
title = "Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in an Employed Population as Determined by Analysis of Three Data Sources",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this study was to compare estimates of the prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) using various data sources. Methods: We integrated health risk assessment (HRA), claims, and biometric screening data from Lockheed Martin Corporation. We measured the extent to which MetS risk factors measured using HRA and medical claims correlated with biometric screening data. Results: Using biometric data, 24.9{\%} of employees were identified as having MetS. Prevalence estimates were much lower using HRA data (6.8{\%}) and claims (3.7{\%}). Between 2012 and 2014, 10.4{\%} of the sample newly acquired MetS. The number of MetS risk factors per employee was predictive of diabetes, heart disease, health care costs, and utilization. Conclusion: MetS is prevalent and associated with progression to disease. It is more easily tracked with biometric screening data than with HRA or claims data. Employers should consider efforts to manage and prevent this condition in their workforce.",
author = "Ronnie Goetzel and Karen Kent and Henke, {Rachel Mosher} and Cory Pack and Malinda D'Arco and Jordana Thomas and James Luckett and Traci Arthur-Hartranft",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JOM.0000000000000931",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "161--168",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in an Employed Population as Determined by Analysis of Three Data Sources

AU - Goetzel, Ronnie

AU - Kent, Karen

AU - Henke, Rachel Mosher

AU - Pack, Cory

AU - D'Arco, Malinda

AU - Thomas, Jordana

AU - Luckett, James

AU - Arthur-Hartranft, Traci

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to compare estimates of the prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) using various data sources. Methods: We integrated health risk assessment (HRA), claims, and biometric screening data from Lockheed Martin Corporation. We measured the extent to which MetS risk factors measured using HRA and medical claims correlated with biometric screening data. Results: Using biometric data, 24.9% of employees were identified as having MetS. Prevalence estimates were much lower using HRA data (6.8%) and claims (3.7%). Between 2012 and 2014, 10.4% of the sample newly acquired MetS. The number of MetS risk factors per employee was predictive of diabetes, heart disease, health care costs, and utilization. Conclusion: MetS is prevalent and associated with progression to disease. It is more easily tracked with biometric screening data than with HRA or claims data. Employers should consider efforts to manage and prevent this condition in their workforce.

AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to compare estimates of the prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) using various data sources. Methods: We integrated health risk assessment (HRA), claims, and biometric screening data from Lockheed Martin Corporation. We measured the extent to which MetS risk factors measured using HRA and medical claims correlated with biometric screening data. Results: Using biometric data, 24.9% of employees were identified as having MetS. Prevalence estimates were much lower using HRA data (6.8%) and claims (3.7%). Between 2012 and 2014, 10.4% of the sample newly acquired MetS. The number of MetS risk factors per employee was predictive of diabetes, heart disease, health care costs, and utilization. Conclusion: MetS is prevalent and associated with progression to disease. It is more easily tracked with biometric screening data than with HRA or claims data. Employers should consider efforts to manage and prevent this condition in their workforce.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013236820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013236820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000931

DO - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000931

M3 - Article

C2 - 28166123

AN - SCOPUS:85013236820

VL - 59

SP - 161

EP - 168

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 2

ER -