Presence of pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in children: what does it really mean?

Matthew D. Neal, Megan Sippey, Barbara A. Gaines, David Hackam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Pneumomediastinum after blunt thoracic trauma is often considered a marker of serious aerodigestive injury that leads to invasive testing. However, the efficacy of such testing in otherwise stable children remains unknown. We hypothesize that pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in clinically stable children is rarely associated with significant underlying injury. Methods: We reviewed all patients in our pediatric trauma database (1997-2007) for pneumomediastinum after blunt injury. Patients were then subdivided into 2 groups: group I, isolated thoracic and group II, thoracic and additional injuries. Procedures and imaging were recorded, and outcomes were assessed. Results: Thirty-two children with blunt thoracic trauma were included as follows: group I (n = 14) and group II (n = 18). In all patients, there were 28 diagnostic procedures performed resulting in only 1 positive test-a bronchial tear found on bronchoscopy in association with obvious respiratory distress. Group I was more than twice as likely to undergo invasive procedures as group II (P <.0001), resulting in significantly greater costs (*$13683 ± 2520 vs $5378 ± 1000; P <.002). Patients in group I also received more diagnostic imaging to assess pneumomediastinum (1.89 vs 1.08 studies/patient per day; P <.05). More than 28% of all patients were completely asymptomatic and had pneumomediastinum as their only marker of injury. Strikingly, these patients received more than 46% of the procedures. Conclusions: Children with pneumomediastinum from blunt trauma often receive invasive and expensive testing with low yield, especially those with isolated thoracic trauma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1322-1327
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mediastinal Emphysema
Wounds and Injuries
Thorax
Thoracic Injuries
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Bronchoscopy
Diagnostic Imaging
Tears
Databases
Pediatrics
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Aerodigestive injury
  • Blunt trauma
  • Pediatric trauma
  • Pneumomediastinum
  • Thoracic trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Presence of pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in children : what does it really mean? / Neal, Matthew D.; Sippey, Megan; Gaines, Barbara A.; Hackam, David.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 44, No. 7, 07.2009, p. 1322-1327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neal, Matthew D. ; Sippey, Megan ; Gaines, Barbara A. ; Hackam, David. / Presence of pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in children : what does it really mean?. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 44, No. 7. pp. 1322-1327.
@article{f4ac433ced584a6abc1a9301aabc0387,
title = "Presence of pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in children: what does it really mean?",
abstract = "Background: Pneumomediastinum after blunt thoracic trauma is often considered a marker of serious aerodigestive injury that leads to invasive testing. However, the efficacy of such testing in otherwise stable children remains unknown. We hypothesize that pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in clinically stable children is rarely associated with significant underlying injury. Methods: We reviewed all patients in our pediatric trauma database (1997-2007) for pneumomediastinum after blunt injury. Patients were then subdivided into 2 groups: group I, isolated thoracic and group II, thoracic and additional injuries. Procedures and imaging were recorded, and outcomes were assessed. Results: Thirty-two children with blunt thoracic trauma were included as follows: group I (n = 14) and group II (n = 18). In all patients, there were 28 diagnostic procedures performed resulting in only 1 positive test-a bronchial tear found on bronchoscopy in association with obvious respiratory distress. Group I was more than twice as likely to undergo invasive procedures as group II (P <.0001), resulting in significantly greater costs (*$13683 ± 2520 vs $5378 ± 1000; P <.002). Patients in group I also received more diagnostic imaging to assess pneumomediastinum (1.89 vs 1.08 studies/patient per day; P <.05). More than 28{\%} of all patients were completely asymptomatic and had pneumomediastinum as their only marker of injury. Strikingly, these patients received more than 46{\%} of the procedures. Conclusions: Children with pneumomediastinum from blunt trauma often receive invasive and expensive testing with low yield, especially those with isolated thoracic trauma.",
keywords = "Aerodigestive injury, Blunt trauma, Pediatric trauma, Pneumomediastinum, Thoracic trauma",
author = "Neal, {Matthew D.} and Megan Sippey and Gaines, {Barbara A.} and David Hackam",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1322--1327",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Presence of pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in children

T2 - what does it really mean?

AU - Neal, Matthew D.

AU - Sippey, Megan

AU - Gaines, Barbara A.

AU - Hackam, David

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Background: Pneumomediastinum after blunt thoracic trauma is often considered a marker of serious aerodigestive injury that leads to invasive testing. However, the efficacy of such testing in otherwise stable children remains unknown. We hypothesize that pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in clinically stable children is rarely associated with significant underlying injury. Methods: We reviewed all patients in our pediatric trauma database (1997-2007) for pneumomediastinum after blunt injury. Patients were then subdivided into 2 groups: group I, isolated thoracic and group II, thoracic and additional injuries. Procedures and imaging were recorded, and outcomes were assessed. Results: Thirty-two children with blunt thoracic trauma were included as follows: group I (n = 14) and group II (n = 18). In all patients, there were 28 diagnostic procedures performed resulting in only 1 positive test-a bronchial tear found on bronchoscopy in association with obvious respiratory distress. Group I was more than twice as likely to undergo invasive procedures as group II (P <.0001), resulting in significantly greater costs (*$13683 ± 2520 vs $5378 ± 1000; P <.002). Patients in group I also received more diagnostic imaging to assess pneumomediastinum (1.89 vs 1.08 studies/patient per day; P <.05). More than 28% of all patients were completely asymptomatic and had pneumomediastinum as their only marker of injury. Strikingly, these patients received more than 46% of the procedures. Conclusions: Children with pneumomediastinum from blunt trauma often receive invasive and expensive testing with low yield, especially those with isolated thoracic trauma.

AB - Background: Pneumomediastinum after blunt thoracic trauma is often considered a marker of serious aerodigestive injury that leads to invasive testing. However, the efficacy of such testing in otherwise stable children remains unknown. We hypothesize that pneumomediastinum after blunt trauma in clinically stable children is rarely associated with significant underlying injury. Methods: We reviewed all patients in our pediatric trauma database (1997-2007) for pneumomediastinum after blunt injury. Patients were then subdivided into 2 groups: group I, isolated thoracic and group II, thoracic and additional injuries. Procedures and imaging were recorded, and outcomes were assessed. Results: Thirty-two children with blunt thoracic trauma were included as follows: group I (n = 14) and group II (n = 18). In all patients, there were 28 diagnostic procedures performed resulting in only 1 positive test-a bronchial tear found on bronchoscopy in association with obvious respiratory distress. Group I was more than twice as likely to undergo invasive procedures as group II (P <.0001), resulting in significantly greater costs (*$13683 ± 2520 vs $5378 ± 1000; P <.002). Patients in group I also received more diagnostic imaging to assess pneumomediastinum (1.89 vs 1.08 studies/patient per day; P <.05). More than 28% of all patients were completely asymptomatic and had pneumomediastinum as their only marker of injury. Strikingly, these patients received more than 46% of the procedures. Conclusions: Children with pneumomediastinum from blunt trauma often receive invasive and expensive testing with low yield, especially those with isolated thoracic trauma.

KW - Aerodigestive injury

KW - Blunt trauma

KW - Pediatric trauma

KW - Pneumomediastinum

KW - Thoracic trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649380518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649380518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.069

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.069

M3 - Article

C2 - 19573655

AN - SCOPUS:67649380518

VL - 44

SP - 1322

EP - 1327

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 7

ER -