Presence of observers at patient-practitioner interactions: Impact on coordination of care and methodologic implications

B. Starfield, Donald M. Steinwachs, I. Morris, G. Bause, S. Siebert, C. Westin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this study in an urban practice, the presence of a neutral observer at follow-up visits enhanced the extent to which practitioners recognized problems which patients had in a previous visit. This improvement was limited to those problems which initially had been mentioned by patients as requiring follow-up. Follow-up of problems initially mentioned by practitioners as needing follow-up was not improved by the observer unless the problem was also mentioned by the patient. Investigators whose information about practitioner-patient interaction depends upon the presence of an observer should be aware of this and possibly other effects. Although routine involvement of a neutral observer in patient-practitioner interactions is probably undesirable, selected deployment of observers or similar alternatives may be useful in situations where practitioner-patient communication is inadequate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1021-1025
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume69
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Communication
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Presence of observers at patient-practitioner interactions : Impact on coordination of care and methodologic implications. / Starfield, B.; Steinwachs, Donald M.; Morris, I.; Bause, G.; Siebert, S.; Westin, C.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 69, No. 10, 1979, p. 1021-1025.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f3ea0c5df9f487f801b5060a326c48a,
title = "Presence of observers at patient-practitioner interactions: Impact on coordination of care and methodologic implications",
abstract = "In this study in an urban practice, the presence of a neutral observer at follow-up visits enhanced the extent to which practitioners recognized problems which patients had in a previous visit. This improvement was limited to those problems which initially had been mentioned by patients as requiring follow-up. Follow-up of problems initially mentioned by practitioners as needing follow-up was not improved by the observer unless the problem was also mentioned by the patient. Investigators whose information about practitioner-patient interaction depends upon the presence of an observer should be aware of this and possibly other effects. Although routine involvement of a neutral observer in patient-practitioner interactions is probably undesirable, selected deployment of observers or similar alternatives may be useful in situations where practitioner-patient communication is inadequate.",
author = "B. Starfield and Steinwachs, {Donald M.} and I. Morris and G. Bause and S. Siebert and C. Westin",
year = "1979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "1021--1025",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Presence of observers at patient-practitioner interactions

T2 - Impact on coordination of care and methodologic implications

AU - Starfield, B.

AU - Steinwachs, Donald M.

AU - Morris, I.

AU - Bause, G.

AU - Siebert, S.

AU - Westin, C.

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - In this study in an urban practice, the presence of a neutral observer at follow-up visits enhanced the extent to which practitioners recognized problems which patients had in a previous visit. This improvement was limited to those problems which initially had been mentioned by patients as requiring follow-up. Follow-up of problems initially mentioned by practitioners as needing follow-up was not improved by the observer unless the problem was also mentioned by the patient. Investigators whose information about practitioner-patient interaction depends upon the presence of an observer should be aware of this and possibly other effects. Although routine involvement of a neutral observer in patient-practitioner interactions is probably undesirable, selected deployment of observers or similar alternatives may be useful in situations where practitioner-patient communication is inadequate.

AB - In this study in an urban practice, the presence of a neutral observer at follow-up visits enhanced the extent to which practitioners recognized problems which patients had in a previous visit. This improvement was limited to those problems which initially had been mentioned by patients as requiring follow-up. Follow-up of problems initially mentioned by practitioners as needing follow-up was not improved by the observer unless the problem was also mentioned by the patient. Investigators whose information about practitioner-patient interaction depends upon the presence of an observer should be aware of this and possibly other effects. Although routine involvement of a neutral observer in patient-practitioner interactions is probably undesirable, selected deployment of observers or similar alternatives may be useful in situations where practitioner-patient communication is inadequate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018733192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018733192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 484755

AN - SCOPUS:0018733192

VL - 69

SP - 1021

EP - 1025

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 10

ER -