Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A consensus of support

Morgan T. Sammons, Ellen S. Zinner, Stephen W. Gorny, Richard Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Prescriptive authority for psychologists became a preeminent practice issue for the psychological community during the 1990s. Scope of practice, relationships with other health care providers, and perhaps even a change in identity of the profession are subsidiary issues bound up in the prescription privileges debate. The authors surveyed Maryland psychologists on this topic and examined 2 decades of opinion surveys regarding prescription privileges. A consistently high level of endorsement of prescription privileges for psychologists has been found over the past decade. At this point, the profession of psychology strongly favors the acquisition of prescription privileges by appropriately trained professional psychologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)604-609
Number of pages6
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Volume31
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2000

Fingerprint

Consensus
Psychology
Prescriptions
Health Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Prescriptive authority for psychologists : A consensus of support. / Sammons, Morgan T.; Zinner, Ellen S.; Gorny, Stephen W.; Allen, Richard.

In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 31, No. 6, 12.2000, p. 604-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sammons, Morgan T. ; Zinner, Ellen S. ; Gorny, Stephen W. ; Allen, Richard. / Prescriptive authority for psychologists : A consensus of support. In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2000 ; Vol. 31, No. 6. pp. 604-609.
@article{f12ae0a9153043acaad29af375cffcc8,
title = "Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A consensus of support",
abstract = "Prescriptive authority for psychologists became a preeminent practice issue for the psychological community during the 1990s. Scope of practice, relationships with other health care providers, and perhaps even a change in identity of the profession are subsidiary issues bound up in the prescription privileges debate. The authors surveyed Maryland psychologists on this topic and examined 2 decades of opinion surveys regarding prescription privileges. A consistently high level of endorsement of prescription privileges for psychologists has been found over the past decade. At this point, the profession of psychology strongly favors the acquisition of prescription privileges by appropriately trained professional psychologists.",
author = "Sammons, {Morgan T.} and Zinner, {Ellen S.} and Gorny, {Stephen W.} and Richard Allen",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "604--609",
journal = "Professional Psychology: Research and Practice",
issn = "0735-7028",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prescriptive authority for psychologists

T2 - A consensus of support

AU - Sammons, Morgan T.

AU - Zinner, Ellen S.

AU - Gorny, Stephen W.

AU - Allen, Richard

PY - 2000/12

Y1 - 2000/12

N2 - Prescriptive authority for psychologists became a preeminent practice issue for the psychological community during the 1990s. Scope of practice, relationships with other health care providers, and perhaps even a change in identity of the profession are subsidiary issues bound up in the prescription privileges debate. The authors surveyed Maryland psychologists on this topic and examined 2 decades of opinion surveys regarding prescription privileges. A consistently high level of endorsement of prescription privileges for psychologists has been found over the past decade. At this point, the profession of psychology strongly favors the acquisition of prescription privileges by appropriately trained professional psychologists.

AB - Prescriptive authority for psychologists became a preeminent practice issue for the psychological community during the 1990s. Scope of practice, relationships with other health care providers, and perhaps even a change in identity of the profession are subsidiary issues bound up in the prescription privileges debate. The authors surveyed Maryland psychologists on this topic and examined 2 decades of opinion surveys regarding prescription privileges. A consistently high level of endorsement of prescription privileges for psychologists has been found over the past decade. At this point, the profession of psychology strongly favors the acquisition of prescription privileges by appropriately trained professional psychologists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034338341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034338341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034338341

VL - 31

SP - 604

EP - 609

JO - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

JF - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

SN - 0735-7028

IS - 6

ER -