Prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding non-administration of prescribed pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Kara L. Piechowski, Stacy Elder, Leigh E. Efird, Elliott Haut, Michael B Streiff, Brandyn Lau, Peggy S. Kraus, Cynthia S Rand, Victor O. Popoola, Deborah B. Hobson, Norma E. Farrow, Dauryne Shaffer, Kenneth M Shermock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is important patient safety practice in hospitalized patients. However, a substantial number of ordered doses are not administered. Patient and nursing attitudes and behaviors can influence whether a patient receives a dose. The objective of this single center study was to evaluate prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding missed doses of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. An anonymous, 9-question survey was administered to internal medicine and general surgery resident physicians. The survey captured prescriber opinions on issues related to non-administration of VTE prophylaxis. Thirty-two percent of medicine residents compared with 3 % of surgery residents felt pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was not necessary in an independently ambulating patient (P <0.001). Medicine residents were more likely to agree that it is appropriate for nurses to make clinical decisions to determine whether a dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis should be administered to a patient (24 vs. 0 %, P <0.001). Study findings indicate the need for additional resident physician education. Further investigation is needed to assess these beliefs and ensure patients receive necessary VTE prophylaxis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 21 2016

Fingerprint

Venous Thromboembolism
Medicine
Physicians
Patient Safety
Internal Medicine
Nursing
Nurses
Education

Keywords

  • Patient safety
  • Survey
  • Thromboembolism
  • VTE prophylaxis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding non-administration of prescribed pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. / Piechowski, Kara L.; Elder, Stacy; Efird, Leigh E.; Haut, Elliott; Streiff, Michael B; Lau, Brandyn; Kraus, Peggy S.; Rand, Cynthia S; Popoola, Victor O.; Hobson, Deborah B.; Farrow, Norma E.; Shaffer, Dauryne; Shermock, Kenneth M.

In: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 21.05.2016, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Piechowski, Kara L. ; Elder, Stacy ; Efird, Leigh E. ; Haut, Elliott ; Streiff, Michael B ; Lau, Brandyn ; Kraus, Peggy S. ; Rand, Cynthia S ; Popoola, Victor O. ; Hobson, Deborah B. ; Farrow, Norma E. ; Shaffer, Dauryne ; Shermock, Kenneth M. / Prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding non-administration of prescribed pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. In: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2016 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{c33f7b16bfe94685b7106c6f308235c1,
title = "Prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding non-administration of prescribed pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis",
abstract = "Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is important patient safety practice in hospitalized patients. However, a substantial number of ordered doses are not administered. Patient and nursing attitudes and behaviors can influence whether a patient receives a dose. The objective of this single center study was to evaluate prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding missed doses of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. An anonymous, 9-question survey was administered to internal medicine and general surgery resident physicians. The survey captured prescriber opinions on issues related to non-administration of VTE prophylaxis. Thirty-two percent of medicine residents compared with 3 {\%} of surgery residents felt pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was not necessary in an independently ambulating patient (P <0.001). Medicine residents were more likely to agree that it is appropriate for nurses to make clinical decisions to determine whether a dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis should be administered to a patient (24 vs. 0 {\%}, P <0.001). Study findings indicate the need for additional resident physician education. Further investigation is needed to assess these beliefs and ensure patients receive necessary VTE prophylaxis.",
keywords = "Patient safety, Survey, Thromboembolism, VTE prophylaxis",
author = "Piechowski, {Kara L.} and Stacy Elder and Efird, {Leigh E.} and Elliott Haut and Streiff, {Michael B} and Brandyn Lau and Kraus, {Peggy S.} and Rand, {Cynthia S} and Popoola, {Victor O.} and Hobson, {Deborah B.} and Farrow, {Norma E.} and Dauryne Shaffer and Shermock, {Kenneth M}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s11239-016-1378-8",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis",
issn = "0929-5305",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding non-administration of prescribed pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

AU - Piechowski, Kara L.

AU - Elder, Stacy

AU - Efird, Leigh E.

AU - Haut, Elliott

AU - Streiff, Michael B

AU - Lau, Brandyn

AU - Kraus, Peggy S.

AU - Rand, Cynthia S

AU - Popoola, Victor O.

AU - Hobson, Deborah B.

AU - Farrow, Norma E.

AU - Shaffer, Dauryne

AU - Shermock, Kenneth M

PY - 2016/5/21

Y1 - 2016/5/21

N2 - Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is important patient safety practice in hospitalized patients. However, a substantial number of ordered doses are not administered. Patient and nursing attitudes and behaviors can influence whether a patient receives a dose. The objective of this single center study was to evaluate prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding missed doses of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. An anonymous, 9-question survey was administered to internal medicine and general surgery resident physicians. The survey captured prescriber opinions on issues related to non-administration of VTE prophylaxis. Thirty-two percent of medicine residents compared with 3 % of surgery residents felt pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was not necessary in an independently ambulating patient (P <0.001). Medicine residents were more likely to agree that it is appropriate for nurses to make clinical decisions to determine whether a dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis should be administered to a patient (24 vs. 0 %, P <0.001). Study findings indicate the need for additional resident physician education. Further investigation is needed to assess these beliefs and ensure patients receive necessary VTE prophylaxis.

AB - Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is important patient safety practice in hospitalized patients. However, a substantial number of ordered doses are not administered. Patient and nursing attitudes and behaviors can influence whether a patient receives a dose. The objective of this single center study was to evaluate prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding missed doses of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. An anonymous, 9-question survey was administered to internal medicine and general surgery resident physicians. The survey captured prescriber opinions on issues related to non-administration of VTE prophylaxis. Thirty-two percent of medicine residents compared with 3 % of surgery residents felt pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was not necessary in an independently ambulating patient (P <0.001). Medicine residents were more likely to agree that it is appropriate for nurses to make clinical decisions to determine whether a dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis should be administered to a patient (24 vs. 0 %, P <0.001). Study findings indicate the need for additional resident physician education. Further investigation is needed to assess these beliefs and ensure patients receive necessary VTE prophylaxis.

KW - Patient safety

KW - Survey

KW - Thromboembolism

KW - VTE prophylaxis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969832930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969832930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11239-016-1378-8

DO - 10.1007/s11239-016-1378-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 27209202

AN - SCOPUS:84969832930

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

JF - Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

SN - 0929-5305

ER -