TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparing to reach
T2 - Selecting an adaptive long-latency feedback controller
AU - Ahmadi-Pajouh, Mohammad Ali
AU - Towhidkhah, Farzad
AU - Shadmehr, Reza
PY - 2012/7/11
Y1 - 2012/7/11
N2 - In a voluntary movement, the nervous system specifies not only the motor commands but also the gains associated with reaction to sensory feedback. For example, suppose that, during reaching, a perturbation tends to push the hand to the left. With practice, the brain not only learns to produce commands that predictively compensate for the perturbation but also increases the long-latency reflex gain associated with leftward displacements of the arm. That is, the brain learns a feedback controller. Here, we wondered whether, during the preparatory period before the reach, the brain engaged this feedback controller in anticipation of the upcoming movement. If so, its signature might be present in how the motor system responds to perturbations in the preparatory period. Humans trained on a reach task in which they adapted to a force field. During the preparatory period before the reach, we measured how the arm responded to a pulse to the hand that was either in the direction of the upcoming field, or in the opposite direction. Reach adaptation produced an increase in the long-latency (45-100 ms delay) feedback gains with respect to baseline, but only for perturbations that were in the same direction as the force field that subjects expected to encounter during the reach. Therefore, as the brain prepares for a reach, it loads a feedback controller specific to the upcoming reach. With adaptation, this feedback controller undergoes a change, increasing the gains for the expected sensory feedback.
AB - In a voluntary movement, the nervous system specifies not only the motor commands but also the gains associated with reaction to sensory feedback. For example, suppose that, during reaching, a perturbation tends to push the hand to the left. With practice, the brain not only learns to produce commands that predictively compensate for the perturbation but also increases the long-latency reflex gain associated with leftward displacements of the arm. That is, the brain learns a feedback controller. Here, we wondered whether, during the preparatory period before the reach, the brain engaged this feedback controller in anticipation of the upcoming movement. If so, its signature might be present in how the motor system responds to perturbations in the preparatory period. Humans trained on a reach task in which they adapted to a force field. During the preparatory period before the reach, we measured how the arm responded to a pulse to the hand that was either in the direction of the upcoming field, or in the opposite direction. Reach adaptation produced an increase in the long-latency (45-100 ms delay) feedback gains with respect to baseline, but only for perturbations that were in the same direction as the force field that subjects expected to encounter during the reach. Therefore, as the brain prepares for a reach, it loads a feedback controller specific to the upcoming reach. With adaptation, this feedback controller undergoes a change, increasing the gains for the expected sensory feedback.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863703010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863703010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4275-11.2012
DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4275-11.2012
M3 - Article
C2 - 22787039
AN - SCOPUS:84863703010
SN - 0270-6474
VL - 32
SP - 9537
EP - 9545
JO - Journal of Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 28
ER -