Preoperative prophylactic cephalothin fails to control septic complications of colorectal operations: Results of controlled clinical trial. A veterans administration cooperative study

Robert E. Condon, John Bartlett, Ronald Lee Nichols, William J. Schulte, Sherwood L. Gorbach, Shigeru Ochi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Data obtained from a survey of the membership of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons indicated that concomitant administration of oral neomycin-erythromycin base and systemic cephalothin, together with mechanical colon cleansing, was the most popular method of colon preparation. We designed a prospective double blind clinical trial to compare administration of intravenous cephalothin, oral neomycin-erythromycin base, and the combination of both the intravenous and oral antibiotics. Intake of patients to the intravenous cephalothin group was stopped because the data indicated that this method of prophylaxis resulted in significantly higher numbers of septic complications. The incidence of wound infection was 30 per cent and the overall incidence of septic complications was 39 per cent in patients receiving only intravenous cephalothin combined with mechanical colon cleansing. The incidence of wound infection and the overall incidence of septic complications was only 6 per cent in the comparison group, and the differences are highly significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-74
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume137
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cephalothin
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Controlled Clinical Trials
Colon
Neomycin
Incidence
Wound Infection
Erythromycin
Intravenous Administration
Oral Administration
Clinical Trials
Anti-Bacterial Agents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Preoperative prophylactic cephalothin fails to control septic complications of colorectal operations : Results of controlled clinical trial. A veterans administration cooperative study. / Condon, Robert E.; Bartlett, John; Nichols, Ronald Lee; Schulte, William J.; Gorbach, Sherwood L.; Ochi, Shigeru.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 137, No. 1, 1979, p. 68-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7f0ed0647db4e049ad049e08973e8d1,
title = "Preoperative prophylactic cephalothin fails to control septic complications of colorectal operations: Results of controlled clinical trial. A veterans administration cooperative study",
abstract = "Data obtained from a survey of the membership of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons indicated that concomitant administration of oral neomycin-erythromycin base and systemic cephalothin, together with mechanical colon cleansing, was the most popular method of colon preparation. We designed a prospective double blind clinical trial to compare administration of intravenous cephalothin, oral neomycin-erythromycin base, and the combination of both the intravenous and oral antibiotics. Intake of patients to the intravenous cephalothin group was stopped because the data indicated that this method of prophylaxis resulted in significantly higher numbers of septic complications. The incidence of wound infection was 30 per cent and the overall incidence of septic complications was 39 per cent in patients receiving only intravenous cephalothin combined with mechanical colon cleansing. The incidence of wound infection and the overall incidence of septic complications was only 6 per cent in the comparison group, and the differences are highly significant.",
author = "Condon, {Robert E.} and John Bartlett and Nichols, {Ronald Lee} and Schulte, {William J.} and Gorbach, {Sherwood L.} and Shigeru Ochi",
year = "1979",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9610(79)90013-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "68--74",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preoperative prophylactic cephalothin fails to control septic complications of colorectal operations

T2 - Results of controlled clinical trial. A veterans administration cooperative study

AU - Condon, Robert E.

AU - Bartlett, John

AU - Nichols, Ronald Lee

AU - Schulte, William J.

AU - Gorbach, Sherwood L.

AU - Ochi, Shigeru

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - Data obtained from a survey of the membership of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons indicated that concomitant administration of oral neomycin-erythromycin base and systemic cephalothin, together with mechanical colon cleansing, was the most popular method of colon preparation. We designed a prospective double blind clinical trial to compare administration of intravenous cephalothin, oral neomycin-erythromycin base, and the combination of both the intravenous and oral antibiotics. Intake of patients to the intravenous cephalothin group was stopped because the data indicated that this method of prophylaxis resulted in significantly higher numbers of septic complications. The incidence of wound infection was 30 per cent and the overall incidence of septic complications was 39 per cent in patients receiving only intravenous cephalothin combined with mechanical colon cleansing. The incidence of wound infection and the overall incidence of septic complications was only 6 per cent in the comparison group, and the differences are highly significant.

AB - Data obtained from a survey of the membership of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons indicated that concomitant administration of oral neomycin-erythromycin base and systemic cephalothin, together with mechanical colon cleansing, was the most popular method of colon preparation. We designed a prospective double blind clinical trial to compare administration of intravenous cephalothin, oral neomycin-erythromycin base, and the combination of both the intravenous and oral antibiotics. Intake of patients to the intravenous cephalothin group was stopped because the data indicated that this method of prophylaxis resulted in significantly higher numbers of septic complications. The incidence of wound infection was 30 per cent and the overall incidence of septic complications was 39 per cent in patients receiving only intravenous cephalothin combined with mechanical colon cleansing. The incidence of wound infection and the overall incidence of septic complications was only 6 per cent in the comparison group, and the differences are highly significant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018397159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018397159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90013-8

DO - 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90013-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 365009

AN - SCOPUS:0018397159

VL - 137

SP - 68

EP - 74

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 1

ER -