Preliminary Development of a Performance Assessment Tool for Documentation of History Taking in Child Physical Abuse

Tanya Burrell, Mary Moffatt, Serkan Toy, Monica Nielsen-Parker, James Anderst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to develop a performance assessment tool for the history-taking components of the medical evaluation of physical abuse in young children by (1) determining the consensus-based injury history and social components for documentation, (2) identifying preliminary performance standards, (3) assessing current level-specific performance using the created tools, and (4) evaluating reliability and validity of the created tools. Methods The Physical Abuse Assessment Tool (PHAAT) was developed in 2 steps: (1) a modified Delphi survey was used to identify the injury history and social components for documentation in a medical evaluation for physical abuse, and (2) level-specific ("novice," "competent," "expert") practice standards (minimum passing scores) were created using the identified components via the Angoff method. To evaluate validity, reliability, and level-specific performance of the PHAAT, a chart review of 50 consecutive cases from each of the 3 levels was performed. Results Seventy-one child abuse pediatricians and 39 social workers participated in the modified Delphi survey, and 67 child abuse pediatricians and 27 social workers participated in the Angoff method. The resulting PHAAT included 2 checklists for use based on presence or absence of a history of an injurious event. One-way analysis of variance shows significant differences in performance based on team level (P < 0.001), indicating construct validity. Intrarater and interrater reliability evaluations showed strong (rs = 0.64-0.92) and moderate to strong (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81-0.98) correlations, respectively. Conclusions Initial evaluation suggests the PHAAT may be a reliable and valid practice assessment tool for the medical evaluation of physical abuse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)675-681
Number of pages7
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume32
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Child Abuse
Documentation
Reproducibility of Results
Medical History Taking
Wounds and Injuries
Physical Abuse
Checklist
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • chart documentation
  • child abuse
  • quality improvement
  • social work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Preliminary Development of a Performance Assessment Tool for Documentation of History Taking in Child Physical Abuse. / Burrell, Tanya; Moffatt, Mary; Toy, Serkan; Nielsen-Parker, Monica; Anderst, James.

In: Pediatric Emergency Care, Vol. 32, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 675-681.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burrell, Tanya ; Moffatt, Mary ; Toy, Serkan ; Nielsen-Parker, Monica ; Anderst, James. / Preliminary Development of a Performance Assessment Tool for Documentation of History Taking in Child Physical Abuse. In: Pediatric Emergency Care. 2016 ; Vol. 32, No. 10. pp. 675-681.
@article{2314f342c92d4c94bc5de2805e02e9e7,
title = "Preliminary Development of a Performance Assessment Tool for Documentation of History Taking in Child Physical Abuse",
abstract = "Objectives This study aimed to develop a performance assessment tool for the history-taking components of the medical evaluation of physical abuse in young children by (1) determining the consensus-based injury history and social components for documentation, (2) identifying preliminary performance standards, (3) assessing current level-specific performance using the created tools, and (4) evaluating reliability and validity of the created tools. Methods The Physical Abuse Assessment Tool (PHAAT) was developed in 2 steps: (1) a modified Delphi survey was used to identify the injury history and social components for documentation in a medical evaluation for physical abuse, and (2) level-specific ({"}novice,{"} {"}competent,{"} {"}expert{"}) practice standards (minimum passing scores) were created using the identified components via the Angoff method. To evaluate validity, reliability, and level-specific performance of the PHAAT, a chart review of 50 consecutive cases from each of the 3 levels was performed. Results Seventy-one child abuse pediatricians and 39 social workers participated in the modified Delphi survey, and 67 child abuse pediatricians and 27 social workers participated in the Angoff method. The resulting PHAAT included 2 checklists for use based on presence or absence of a history of an injurious event. One-way analysis of variance shows significant differences in performance based on team level (P < 0.001), indicating construct validity. Intrarater and interrater reliability evaluations showed strong (rs = 0.64-0.92) and moderate to strong (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81-0.98) correlations, respectively. Conclusions Initial evaluation suggests the PHAAT may be a reliable and valid practice assessment tool for the medical evaluation of physical abuse.",
keywords = "chart documentation, child abuse, quality improvement, social work",
author = "Tanya Burrell and Mary Moffatt and Serkan Toy and Monica Nielsen-Parker and James Anderst",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PEC.0000000000000442",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "675--681",
journal = "Pediatric Emergency Care",
issn = "0749-5161",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preliminary Development of a Performance Assessment Tool for Documentation of History Taking in Child Physical Abuse

AU - Burrell, Tanya

AU - Moffatt, Mary

AU - Toy, Serkan

AU - Nielsen-Parker, Monica

AU - Anderst, James

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objectives This study aimed to develop a performance assessment tool for the history-taking components of the medical evaluation of physical abuse in young children by (1) determining the consensus-based injury history and social components for documentation, (2) identifying preliminary performance standards, (3) assessing current level-specific performance using the created tools, and (4) evaluating reliability and validity of the created tools. Methods The Physical Abuse Assessment Tool (PHAAT) was developed in 2 steps: (1) a modified Delphi survey was used to identify the injury history and social components for documentation in a medical evaluation for physical abuse, and (2) level-specific ("novice," "competent," "expert") practice standards (minimum passing scores) were created using the identified components via the Angoff method. To evaluate validity, reliability, and level-specific performance of the PHAAT, a chart review of 50 consecutive cases from each of the 3 levels was performed. Results Seventy-one child abuse pediatricians and 39 social workers participated in the modified Delphi survey, and 67 child abuse pediatricians and 27 social workers participated in the Angoff method. The resulting PHAAT included 2 checklists for use based on presence or absence of a history of an injurious event. One-way analysis of variance shows significant differences in performance based on team level (P < 0.001), indicating construct validity. Intrarater and interrater reliability evaluations showed strong (rs = 0.64-0.92) and moderate to strong (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81-0.98) correlations, respectively. Conclusions Initial evaluation suggests the PHAAT may be a reliable and valid practice assessment tool for the medical evaluation of physical abuse.

AB - Objectives This study aimed to develop a performance assessment tool for the history-taking components of the medical evaluation of physical abuse in young children by (1) determining the consensus-based injury history and social components for documentation, (2) identifying preliminary performance standards, (3) assessing current level-specific performance using the created tools, and (4) evaluating reliability and validity of the created tools. Methods The Physical Abuse Assessment Tool (PHAAT) was developed in 2 steps: (1) a modified Delphi survey was used to identify the injury history and social components for documentation in a medical evaluation for physical abuse, and (2) level-specific ("novice," "competent," "expert") practice standards (minimum passing scores) were created using the identified components via the Angoff method. To evaluate validity, reliability, and level-specific performance of the PHAAT, a chart review of 50 consecutive cases from each of the 3 levels was performed. Results Seventy-one child abuse pediatricians and 39 social workers participated in the modified Delphi survey, and 67 child abuse pediatricians and 27 social workers participated in the Angoff method. The resulting PHAAT included 2 checklists for use based on presence or absence of a history of an injurious event. One-way analysis of variance shows significant differences in performance based on team level (P < 0.001), indicating construct validity. Intrarater and interrater reliability evaluations showed strong (rs = 0.64-0.92) and moderate to strong (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81-0.98) correlations, respectively. Conclusions Initial evaluation suggests the PHAAT may be a reliable and valid practice assessment tool for the medical evaluation of physical abuse.

KW - chart documentation

KW - child abuse

KW - quality improvement

KW - social work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991577874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991577874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000442

DO - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000442

M3 - Article

C2 - 26011806

AN - SCOPUS:84991577874

VL - 32

SP - 675

EP - 681

JO - Pediatric Emergency Care

JF - Pediatric Emergency Care

SN - 0749-5161

IS - 10

ER -