Pregnancy outcomes of liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Neha A. Deshpande, Nathan T. James, Lauren M. Kucirka, Brian J. Boyarsky, Jacqueline Garonzik, Andrew M Cameron, Andrew L. Singer, Nabil N. Dagher, Dorry Segev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Approximately 14,000 women of reproductive age are currently living in the United States after liver transplantation (LT), and another 500 undergo LT each year. Although LT improves reproductive function in women with advanced liver disease, the associated pregnancy outcomes and maternal-fetal risks have not been quantified in a broad manner. To obtain more generalizable inferences, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles that were published between 2000 and 2011 and reported pregnancy-related outcomes for LT recipients. Eight of 578 unique studies met the inclusion criteria, and these studies represented 450 pregnancies in 306 LT recipients. The post-LT live birth rate [76.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 72.7%-80.7%] was higher than the live birth rate for the US general population (66.7%) but was similar to the post-kidney transplantation (KT) live birth rate (73.5%). The post-LT miscarriage rate (15.6%, 95% CI = 12.3%-19.2%) was lower than the miscarriage rate for the general population (17.1%) but was similar to the post-KT miscarriage rate (14.0%). The rates of pre-eclampsia (21.9%, 95% CI = 17.7%-26.4%), cesarean section delivery (44.6%, 95% CI = 39.2%-50.1%), and preterm delivery (39.4%, 95% CI = 33.1%-46.0%) were higher than the rates for the US general population (3.8%, 31.9%, and 12.5%, respectively) but lower than the post-KT rates (27.0%, 56.9%, and 45.6%, respectively). Both the mean gestational age and the mean birth weight were significantly greater (P <0.001) for LT recipients versus KT recipients (36.5 versus 35.6 weeks and 2866 versus 2420 g). Although pregnancy after LT is feasible, the complication rates are relatively high and should be considered during patient counseling and clinical decision making. More case and center reports are necessary so that information on post-LT pregnancy outcomes and complications can be gathered to improve the clinical management of pregnant LT recipients. Continued reporting to active registries is highly encouraged at the center level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-629
Number of pages9
JournalLiver Transplantation
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Pregnancy Outcome
Liver Transplantation
Meta-Analysis
Liver
Kidney Transplantation
Confidence Intervals
Birth Rate
Live Birth
Spontaneous Abortion
Transplant Recipients
Population
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
Pre-Eclampsia
Birth Weight
Cesarean Section
Gestational Age
Registries
Liver Diseases
Counseling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation
  • Hepatology

Cite this

Pregnancy outcomes of liver transplant recipients : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Deshpande, Neha A.; James, Nathan T.; Kucirka, Lauren M.; Boyarsky, Brian J.; Garonzik, Jacqueline; Cameron, Andrew M; Singer, Andrew L.; Dagher, Nabil N.; Segev, Dorry.

In: Liver Transplantation, Vol. 18, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 621-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deshpande, Neha A. ; James, Nathan T. ; Kucirka, Lauren M. ; Boyarsky, Brian J. ; Garonzik, Jacqueline ; Cameron, Andrew M ; Singer, Andrew L. ; Dagher, Nabil N. ; Segev, Dorry. / Pregnancy outcomes of liver transplant recipients : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Liver Transplantation. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 6. pp. 621-629.
@article{ae151b694dfd4c0e8cf90e8706b061c8,
title = "Pregnancy outcomes of liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Approximately 14,000 women of reproductive age are currently living in the United States after liver transplantation (LT), and another 500 undergo LT each year. Although LT improves reproductive function in women with advanced liver disease, the associated pregnancy outcomes and maternal-fetal risks have not been quantified in a broad manner. To obtain more generalizable inferences, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles that were published between 2000 and 2011 and reported pregnancy-related outcomes for LT recipients. Eight of 578 unique studies met the inclusion criteria, and these studies represented 450 pregnancies in 306 LT recipients. The post-LT live birth rate [76.9{\%}, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) = 72.7{\%}-80.7{\%}] was higher than the live birth rate for the US general population (66.7{\%}) but was similar to the post-kidney transplantation (KT) live birth rate (73.5{\%}). The post-LT miscarriage rate (15.6{\%}, 95{\%} CI = 12.3{\%}-19.2{\%}) was lower than the miscarriage rate for the general population (17.1{\%}) but was similar to the post-KT miscarriage rate (14.0{\%}). The rates of pre-eclampsia (21.9{\%}, 95{\%} CI = 17.7{\%}-26.4{\%}), cesarean section delivery (44.6{\%}, 95{\%} CI = 39.2{\%}-50.1{\%}), and preterm delivery (39.4{\%}, 95{\%} CI = 33.1{\%}-46.0{\%}) were higher than the rates for the US general population (3.8{\%}, 31.9{\%}, and 12.5{\%}, respectively) but lower than the post-KT rates (27.0{\%}, 56.9{\%}, and 45.6{\%}, respectively). Both the mean gestational age and the mean birth weight were significantly greater (P <0.001) for LT recipients versus KT recipients (36.5 versus 35.6 weeks and 2866 versus 2420 g). Although pregnancy after LT is feasible, the complication rates are relatively high and should be considered during patient counseling and clinical decision making. More case and center reports are necessary so that information on post-LT pregnancy outcomes and complications can be gathered to improve the clinical management of pregnant LT recipients. Continued reporting to active registries is highly encouraged at the center level.",
author = "Deshpande, {Neha A.} and James, {Nathan T.} and Kucirka, {Lauren M.} and Boyarsky, {Brian J.} and Jacqueline Garonzik and Cameron, {Andrew M} and Singer, {Andrew L.} and Dagher, {Nabil N.} and Dorry Segev",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/lt.23416",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "621--629",
journal = "Liver Transplantation",
issn = "1527-6465",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pregnancy outcomes of liver transplant recipients

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Deshpande, Neha A.

AU - James, Nathan T.

AU - Kucirka, Lauren M.

AU - Boyarsky, Brian J.

AU - Garonzik, Jacqueline

AU - Cameron, Andrew M

AU - Singer, Andrew L.

AU - Dagher, Nabil N.

AU - Segev, Dorry

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Approximately 14,000 women of reproductive age are currently living in the United States after liver transplantation (LT), and another 500 undergo LT each year. Although LT improves reproductive function in women with advanced liver disease, the associated pregnancy outcomes and maternal-fetal risks have not been quantified in a broad manner. To obtain more generalizable inferences, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles that were published between 2000 and 2011 and reported pregnancy-related outcomes for LT recipients. Eight of 578 unique studies met the inclusion criteria, and these studies represented 450 pregnancies in 306 LT recipients. The post-LT live birth rate [76.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 72.7%-80.7%] was higher than the live birth rate for the US general population (66.7%) but was similar to the post-kidney transplantation (KT) live birth rate (73.5%). The post-LT miscarriage rate (15.6%, 95% CI = 12.3%-19.2%) was lower than the miscarriage rate for the general population (17.1%) but was similar to the post-KT miscarriage rate (14.0%). The rates of pre-eclampsia (21.9%, 95% CI = 17.7%-26.4%), cesarean section delivery (44.6%, 95% CI = 39.2%-50.1%), and preterm delivery (39.4%, 95% CI = 33.1%-46.0%) were higher than the rates for the US general population (3.8%, 31.9%, and 12.5%, respectively) but lower than the post-KT rates (27.0%, 56.9%, and 45.6%, respectively). Both the mean gestational age and the mean birth weight were significantly greater (P <0.001) for LT recipients versus KT recipients (36.5 versus 35.6 weeks and 2866 versus 2420 g). Although pregnancy after LT is feasible, the complication rates are relatively high and should be considered during patient counseling and clinical decision making. More case and center reports are necessary so that information on post-LT pregnancy outcomes and complications can be gathered to improve the clinical management of pregnant LT recipients. Continued reporting to active registries is highly encouraged at the center level.

AB - Approximately 14,000 women of reproductive age are currently living in the United States after liver transplantation (LT), and another 500 undergo LT each year. Although LT improves reproductive function in women with advanced liver disease, the associated pregnancy outcomes and maternal-fetal risks have not been quantified in a broad manner. To obtain more generalizable inferences, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles that were published between 2000 and 2011 and reported pregnancy-related outcomes for LT recipients. Eight of 578 unique studies met the inclusion criteria, and these studies represented 450 pregnancies in 306 LT recipients. The post-LT live birth rate [76.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 72.7%-80.7%] was higher than the live birth rate for the US general population (66.7%) but was similar to the post-kidney transplantation (KT) live birth rate (73.5%). The post-LT miscarriage rate (15.6%, 95% CI = 12.3%-19.2%) was lower than the miscarriage rate for the general population (17.1%) but was similar to the post-KT miscarriage rate (14.0%). The rates of pre-eclampsia (21.9%, 95% CI = 17.7%-26.4%), cesarean section delivery (44.6%, 95% CI = 39.2%-50.1%), and preterm delivery (39.4%, 95% CI = 33.1%-46.0%) were higher than the rates for the US general population (3.8%, 31.9%, and 12.5%, respectively) but lower than the post-KT rates (27.0%, 56.9%, and 45.6%, respectively). Both the mean gestational age and the mean birth weight were significantly greater (P <0.001) for LT recipients versus KT recipients (36.5 versus 35.6 weeks and 2866 versus 2420 g). Although pregnancy after LT is feasible, the complication rates are relatively high and should be considered during patient counseling and clinical decision making. More case and center reports are necessary so that information on post-LT pregnancy outcomes and complications can be gathered to improve the clinical management of pregnant LT recipients. Continued reporting to active registries is highly encouraged at the center level.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861829103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861829103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lt.23416

DO - 10.1002/lt.23416

M3 - Article

C2 - 22344967

AN - SCOPUS:84861829103

VL - 18

SP - 621

EP - 629

JO - Liver Transplantation

JF - Liver Transplantation

SN - 1527-6465

IS - 6

ER -