TY - JOUR
T1 - Pregnancy outcome in natural family planning users
T2 - Cohort and case-control studies evaluating safety
AU - Simpson, J. L.
AU - Gray, R. H.
AU - Perez, A.
AU - Mena, P.
AU - Barbato, M.
AU - Castilla, E. E.
AU - Kambic, R. T.
AU - Pardo, F.
AU - Tagliabue, G.
AU - Stephenson, W. S.
AU - Bitto, A.
AU - Li, C.
AU - Jennings, V. H.
AU - Spieler, J. M.
AU - Queenan, J. T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This investigation was supported by grant BR-US-004 from the United States Agency for International Development and the Institute for International Studies in Natural Family Planning, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, and grant #5 P30-HD06268 from the National Institute of Child Health and Development to the Johns Hopkins Population Center. The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect those of USAID.
Copyright:
Copyright 2007 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1997/6
Y1 - 1997/6
N2 - Conceptions involving aging gametes are of relevance to natural family planning (NFP) because women using NFP to avoid pregnancy abstain from intercourse during the fertile time of the cycle. To help verify the safety of pregnancies occurring among NFP practitioners, our group has, since 1986, conducted a large cohort study involving six experienced NFP centers. Timing of conception was determined from NFP charts, in which women recorded days on which intercourse occurred. The number of days from the most probable conception intercourse to probable day of ovulation was first determined, and used as an estimate of the time gametes remained in the genital tract before fertilization. Several studies have already been completed, cohort as well as case-control in nature. 1. Spontaneous abortions. Three hundred and sixty-one conceptions occurred during the optimal time (day -1 or 0 relative to ovulation), and of these 33 resulted in spontaneous abortion (9.1%). Five hundred and seven conceptions occurred at non-optimal times during the cycle, and of these 55 resulted in spontaneous abortions (10.9%). These differences were not statistically significant (relative risk 1.19, 95% CI, 0.79-1.80). 2. Anomalies. Among 780 singleton births in 868 cohort pregnancies, 24 infants had major anomalies (3.1%) as of the present analysis. This frequency is comparable to the general population. To further assess anomalies we employed a case-control approach. All consecutive births (live and stillborn) weighing 500 g or more taking place in 18 participating South American hospitals were examined for minor and major congential anomalies. Mothers of malformed and control infants did not differ with respect to the reported frequency of NFP use, which overall was 6.3% of the 10,642 mothers interviewed (5277 having a malformed infant; 5371 controls). Of 262 discordant pairs, there were 28 or 10.69% mothers within the Down syndrome case group vs. 16/262 or 6.11% among matched controls. The odds ratio was 1.84, 95% CI, 0.99-3.96; however, even this non-significant difference narrowed substantially when adjusted for maternal age (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.84-3.75); parity (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.87-3.24); maternal educational level (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 0.86-3.44); or all three together (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.83-3.64). Conclusions. Our findings should be reassuring to natural family planning users. The overall rate of spontaneous abortion was not increased in NFP users who became pregnant, nor to date was the rate of anomalies. Any contribution to Down syndrome or abortion due to aging gametes would have to be small.
AB - Conceptions involving aging gametes are of relevance to natural family planning (NFP) because women using NFP to avoid pregnancy abstain from intercourse during the fertile time of the cycle. To help verify the safety of pregnancies occurring among NFP practitioners, our group has, since 1986, conducted a large cohort study involving six experienced NFP centers. Timing of conception was determined from NFP charts, in which women recorded days on which intercourse occurred. The number of days from the most probable conception intercourse to probable day of ovulation was first determined, and used as an estimate of the time gametes remained in the genital tract before fertilization. Several studies have already been completed, cohort as well as case-control in nature. 1. Spontaneous abortions. Three hundred and sixty-one conceptions occurred during the optimal time (day -1 or 0 relative to ovulation), and of these 33 resulted in spontaneous abortion (9.1%). Five hundred and seven conceptions occurred at non-optimal times during the cycle, and of these 55 resulted in spontaneous abortions (10.9%). These differences were not statistically significant (relative risk 1.19, 95% CI, 0.79-1.80). 2. Anomalies. Among 780 singleton births in 868 cohort pregnancies, 24 infants had major anomalies (3.1%) as of the present analysis. This frequency is comparable to the general population. To further assess anomalies we employed a case-control approach. All consecutive births (live and stillborn) weighing 500 g or more taking place in 18 participating South American hospitals were examined for minor and major congential anomalies. Mothers of malformed and control infants did not differ with respect to the reported frequency of NFP use, which overall was 6.3% of the 10,642 mothers interviewed (5277 having a malformed infant; 5371 controls). Of 262 discordant pairs, there were 28 or 10.69% mothers within the Down syndrome case group vs. 16/262 or 6.11% among matched controls. The odds ratio was 1.84, 95% CI, 0.99-3.96; however, even this non-significant difference narrowed substantially when adjusted for maternal age (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.84-3.75); parity (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.87-3.24); maternal educational level (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 0.86-3.44); or all three together (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.83-3.64). Conclusions. Our findings should be reassuring to natural family planning users. The overall rate of spontaneous abortion was not increased in NFP users who became pregnant, nor to date was the rate of anomalies. Any contribution to Down syndrome or abortion due to aging gametes would have to be small.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8544279577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8544279577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1006556022127
DO - 10.1023/A:1006556022127
M3 - Article
C2 - 9288338
AN - SCOPUS:8544279577
SN - 0267-4874
VL - 13
SP - 201
EP - 214
JO - Advances in Contraception
JF - Advances in Contraception
IS - 2-3
ER -