Abstract
Objective: To determine if there is a difference in the length of labor, and method of delivery between preeclamptic and normotensive patients. Methods: A retrospective case control study was performed using a perinatal database. Study subjects included nulliparous patients diagnosed with preeclampsia, and were compared with normotensive nulliparous patients. Results: There were 1454 controls and 727 subjects identified. There was no difference between groups with regard to duration of total labor. There was a statistically but not clinically significant increase in the duration of the second stage in preeclamptics (35 vs. 27 min, P = 0.003). Preeclamptics had a consistently higher risk of cesarean delivery, even when controlled for confounding variables. Conclusion: The clinical belief that preeclamptic patients have more rapid labors is not supported. Preeclamptics do seem to have a higher risk of cesarean delivery.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 39-42 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1997 |
Keywords
- Cesarean delivery
- Induction of labor
- Labor
- Preeclampsia
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology