Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures

Stephen Kaptoge, Thomas J. Beck, Jonathan Reeve, Katie L. Stone, Teresa A. Hillier, Jane A. Cauley, Steven R. Cummings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The role of bone tissue's geometric distribution in hip fracture risk requires full evaluation in large population-based datasets. We tested whether section modulus, a geometric index of bending strength, predicted hip fracture better than BMD. Among 7474 women from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) with hip DXA scans at baseline, there were 635 incident hip fractures recorded over 13 yr. Hip structural analysis software was used to derive variables from the DXA scans at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanter (IT), and shaft (S) regions. Associations of derived structural variables with hip fracture were assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Hip fracture prediction was assessed using the C-index concordance statistic. Incident hip fracture cases had larger neck-shaft angles, larger subperiosteal and estimated endosteal diameters, greater distances from lateral cortical margin to center of mass (lateral distance), and higher estimated buckling ratios (p < 0.0001 for each). Areal BMD, cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, section modulus, estimated cortical thickness, and centroid position were all lower in hip fracture cases (p < 0.044). In hip fracture prediction using NN region parameters, estimated cortical thickness, areal BMD, and estimated buckling ratio were equivalent (C-index = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.70, 0.74), but section modulus performed less well (C-index = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58, 0.63; p < 0.0001 for difference). In multivariable models combining hip structural analysis variables and age, effects of bone dimensions (i.e., lateral distance, subperiosteal diameter, and estimated endosteal width) were interchangeable, whereas age and neck-shaft angle were independent predictors. Several parsimonious multivariable models that were prognostically equivalent for the NN region were obtained combining a measure of width, a measure of mass, age, and neck-shaft angle (BMD is a ratio of mass to width in the NN region; C-index = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75, 0.79). Trochanteric fractures were best predicted by analysis of the IT region. Because section modulus failed to predict hip fracture risk as well as areal BMD, the thinner cortices and wider bones among those who fractured may imply that simple failure in bending is not the usual event in fracture. Fracture might require initiation (e.g., by localized crushing or buckling of the lateral cortex).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1892-1904
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes


  • BMD
  • Bone geometry
  • Buckling ratio
  • Hip fracture risk
  • Osteoporosis
  • Section modulus
  • Structural instability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this