TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting skeletal stature using ancient DNA
AU - Cox, Samantha L.
AU - Moots, Hannah M.
AU - Stock, Jay T.
AU - Shbat, Andrej
AU - Bitarello, Bárbara D.
AU - Nicklisch, Nicole
AU - Alt, Kurt W.
AU - Haak, Wolfgang
AU - Rosenstock, Eva
AU - Ruff, Christopher B.
AU - Mathieson, Iain
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a Research Fellowship from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG‐2018‐10647) and a New Investigator Research Grant from the Charles E. Kaufman Foundation (KA2018‐98559). Some isotope and skeletal data were collected in collaboration with Alisa Scheibner and Julia Ebert, within the Emmy‐Noether‐Projekt “LiVES” funded by German Research Foundation Grant RO4148/1 (PI Eva Rosenstock). This research made use of the UK Biobank Resource under Application 33923.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. American Journal of Biological Anthropology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Objectives: Ancient DNA provides an opportunity to separate the genetic and environmental bases of complex traits by allowing direct estimation of genetic values in ancient individuals. Here, we test whether genetic scores for height in ancient individuals are predictive of their actual height, as inferred from skeletal remains. We estimate the contributions of genetic and environmental variables to observed phenotypic variation as a first step towards quantifying individual sources of morphological variation. Materials and methods: We collected stature estimates and femur lengths from West Eurasian skeletal remains with published genome-wide ancient DNA data (n = 182, dating from 33,000–850 BP). We also recorded genetic sex, genetic ancestry, date and paleoclimate data for each individual, and δ13C and δ15N stable isotope values where available (n = 69). We tested different methods of calculating polygenic scores, using summary statistics from four different genome wide association studies (GWAS) for height, and three methods for imputing missing genotypes. Results: A polygenic score for height predicts 6.3% of the variance in femur length in our data (n = 132, SD = 0.0069%, p = 0.001), controlling for sex, ancestry, and date. This is consistent with the predictive power of height PRS in present-day populations and the low coverage of ancient samples. Comparatively, sex explains about 17% of the variance in femur length in our sample. Environmental effects also likely play a role in variation, independent of genetics, though with considerable uncertainty (longitude: R2 = 0.033, SD = 0.008, p = 0.011). Genotype imputation did not improve polygenic prediction, and results varied based on the GWAS summary statistics we used. Discussion: Polygenic scores explain a small but significant proportion of the variance in height in ancient individuals, though not enough to make useful predictions of individual phenotypes. However, environmental variables also contribute to phenotypic outcomes and understanding their interaction with direct genetic predictions will provide a framework with which to model how plasticity and genetic changes ultimately combine to drive adaptation and evolution.
AB - Objectives: Ancient DNA provides an opportunity to separate the genetic and environmental bases of complex traits by allowing direct estimation of genetic values in ancient individuals. Here, we test whether genetic scores for height in ancient individuals are predictive of their actual height, as inferred from skeletal remains. We estimate the contributions of genetic and environmental variables to observed phenotypic variation as a first step towards quantifying individual sources of morphological variation. Materials and methods: We collected stature estimates and femur lengths from West Eurasian skeletal remains with published genome-wide ancient DNA data (n = 182, dating from 33,000–850 BP). We also recorded genetic sex, genetic ancestry, date and paleoclimate data for each individual, and δ13C and δ15N stable isotope values where available (n = 69). We tested different methods of calculating polygenic scores, using summary statistics from four different genome wide association studies (GWAS) for height, and three methods for imputing missing genotypes. Results: A polygenic score for height predicts 6.3% of the variance in femur length in our data (n = 132, SD = 0.0069%, p = 0.001), controlling for sex, ancestry, and date. This is consistent with the predictive power of height PRS in present-day populations and the low coverage of ancient samples. Comparatively, sex explains about 17% of the variance in femur length in our sample. Environmental effects also likely play a role in variation, independent of genetics, though with considerable uncertainty (longitude: R2 = 0.033, SD = 0.008, p = 0.011). Genotype imputation did not improve polygenic prediction, and results varied based on the GWAS summary statistics we used. Discussion: Polygenic scores explain a small but significant proportion of the variance in height in ancient individuals, though not enough to make useful predictions of individual phenotypes. However, environmental variables also contribute to phenotypic outcomes and understanding their interaction with direct genetic predictions will provide a framework with which to model how plasticity and genetic changes ultimately combine to drive adaptation and evolution.
KW - genotype
KW - human variation
KW - phenotype
KW - polygenic traits
KW - population genetics
KW - skeletal stature
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129264858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129264858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.24426
DO - 10.1002/ajpa.24426
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129264858
SN - 0002-9483
VL - 177
SP - 162
EP - 174
JO - American Journal of Biological Anthropology
JF - American Journal of Biological Anthropology
IS - 1
ER -