Predicting infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma patient outcome post-tace: Mr bias field correction effect on 3d-quantitative image analysis

Cuihong Liu, Susanne Smolka, Xenophon Papademetris, Duc Do Minh, Geliang Gan, Yanhong Deng, Mingde Lin, Julius Chapiro, Ximing Wang, Christos Georgiades, Kelvin Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Aims: To investigate the impact of MR bias field correction on response determination and survival prediction using volumetric tumor enhancement analysis in patients with infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma, after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods: This study included 101 patients treated with conventional or drug-eluting beads TACE between the years of 2001 and 2013. Semi-automated 3D quantification software was used to segment and calculate the enhancing tumor volume (ETV) of the liver with and without bias-field correction on multi-phasic contrast-enhanced MRI before and 1-month after initial TACE. ETV (expressed as cm3) at baseline imaging and the relative change in ETV (as % change, ETV%) before and after TACE were used to predict response and survival, re-spectively. Statistical survival analyses included Kaplan-Meier curve generation and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Q statistics were calculated and used to identify the best cut-off value for ETV to separate responders and non-responders (ETV cm3). The difference in survival was evaluated between responders and non-responders using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Results: MR bias field correction correlated with improved response calculation from baseline MR as well as survival after TACE; using a 415 cm3 cut-off for ETV at baseline (hazard ratio: 2.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-3.26, p=0.01) resulted in significantly improved response prediction (median survival in patients with baseline ETV <415 cm3: 19.66 months vs. ≥415 cm3: 9.21 months, p<0.001, log-rank test). A ≥41% relative decrease in ETV (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95%confidence interval: 0.37-0.93, p=0.02) was significant in predicting survival (ETV ≥41%: 19.20 months vs. ETV <41%: 8.71 months, p=0.008, log-rank test). Without MR bias field correction, response from baseline ETV could be predicted but survival after TACE could not. Conclusions: MR bias field correction improves both response assessment and accuracy of survival prediction using whole liver tumor enhancement analysis from baseline MR after initial TACE in patients with infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)292-298
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • 3D volume measurement
  • Bias field correction
  • Infiltrative HCC
  • Segmentation
  • TACE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma patient outcome post-tace: Mr bias field correction effect on 3d-quantitative image analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this