Predicting enrollment in two randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacologic interventions for youth with primary mood disorders

Andrea Young, Adina M. Seidenfeld, K. Zachary Healy, L. Eugene Arnold, Mary A. Fristad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: As recruitment and retention are often challenging in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study sought to identify predictors of participation (i.e., trial enrollment). Method: These analyses identified predictors of enrollment among 119 youth, ages 7–14, with a primary mood disorder, who screened eligible for the Omega-3 and Therapy pilot studies; 95 (79.8%) actually participated in the treatment. Results: Youth who received some form of travel assistance (16.0%) almost uniformly enrolled in the treatment portion of the RCT. Youth who lived further away from the study site (p =.047) or whose primary caregiver never married (p =.01) were less likely to enroll. Of note, socioeconomic status (SES) variables (parent education and child insurance status) did not significantly predict enrollment, suggesting that study incentives or accommodations may have adequately addressed barriers commonly associated with SES. Limitations: Due to the fairly high trial enrollment rate (approximately 80%), there likely was limited power to detect some differences between groups. Generalizability may be limited to youth with a primary mood disorder diagnosis. Conclusions: Despite retaining a large proportion of the youth who screened eligible, participant self-selection is a limitation of any RCT. A silent inclusion criterion of any RCT is willingness to be randomized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-373
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume235
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Mood Disorders
Randomized Controlled Trials
Social Class
Insurance Coverage
Caregivers
Motivation
Therapeutics
Education

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Children
  • Mood disorders
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Trial enrollment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Predicting enrollment in two randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacologic interventions for youth with primary mood disorders. / Young, Andrea; Seidenfeld, Adina M.; Healy, K. Zachary; Arnold, L. Eugene; Fristad, Mary A.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 235, 01.08.2018, p. 368-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Young, Andrea ; Seidenfeld, Adina M. ; Healy, K. Zachary ; Arnold, L. Eugene ; Fristad, Mary A. / Predicting enrollment in two randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacologic interventions for youth with primary mood disorders. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018 ; Vol. 235. pp. 368-373.
@article{887e6348c70a4f19996682cdd9cb860a,
title = "Predicting enrollment in two randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacologic interventions for youth with primary mood disorders",
abstract = "Background: As recruitment and retention are often challenging in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study sought to identify predictors of participation (i.e., trial enrollment). Method: These analyses identified predictors of enrollment among 119 youth, ages 7–14, with a primary mood disorder, who screened eligible for the Omega-3 and Therapy pilot studies; 95 (79.8{\%}) actually participated in the treatment. Results: Youth who received some form of travel assistance (16.0{\%}) almost uniformly enrolled in the treatment portion of the RCT. Youth who lived further away from the study site (p =.047) or whose primary caregiver never married (p =.01) were less likely to enroll. Of note, socioeconomic status (SES) variables (parent education and child insurance status) did not significantly predict enrollment, suggesting that study incentives or accommodations may have adequately addressed barriers commonly associated with SES. Limitations: Due to the fairly high trial enrollment rate (approximately 80{\%}), there likely was limited power to detect some differences between groups. Generalizability may be limited to youth with a primary mood disorder diagnosis. Conclusions: Despite retaining a large proportion of the youth who screened eligible, participant self-selection is a limitation of any RCT. A silent inclusion criterion of any RCT is willingness to be randomized.",
keywords = "Adolescents, Children, Mood disorders, Randomized controlled trial, Trial enrollment",
author = "Andrea Young and Seidenfeld, {Adina M.} and Healy, {K. Zachary} and Arnold, {L. Eugene} and Fristad, {Mary A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "235",
pages = "368--373",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting enrollment in two randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacologic interventions for youth with primary mood disorders

AU - Young, Andrea

AU - Seidenfeld, Adina M.

AU - Healy, K. Zachary

AU - Arnold, L. Eugene

AU - Fristad, Mary A.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Background: As recruitment and retention are often challenging in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study sought to identify predictors of participation (i.e., trial enrollment). Method: These analyses identified predictors of enrollment among 119 youth, ages 7–14, with a primary mood disorder, who screened eligible for the Omega-3 and Therapy pilot studies; 95 (79.8%) actually participated in the treatment. Results: Youth who received some form of travel assistance (16.0%) almost uniformly enrolled in the treatment portion of the RCT. Youth who lived further away from the study site (p =.047) or whose primary caregiver never married (p =.01) were less likely to enroll. Of note, socioeconomic status (SES) variables (parent education and child insurance status) did not significantly predict enrollment, suggesting that study incentives or accommodations may have adequately addressed barriers commonly associated with SES. Limitations: Due to the fairly high trial enrollment rate (approximately 80%), there likely was limited power to detect some differences between groups. Generalizability may be limited to youth with a primary mood disorder diagnosis. Conclusions: Despite retaining a large proportion of the youth who screened eligible, participant self-selection is a limitation of any RCT. A silent inclusion criterion of any RCT is willingness to be randomized.

AB - Background: As recruitment and retention are often challenging in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this study sought to identify predictors of participation (i.e., trial enrollment). Method: These analyses identified predictors of enrollment among 119 youth, ages 7–14, with a primary mood disorder, who screened eligible for the Omega-3 and Therapy pilot studies; 95 (79.8%) actually participated in the treatment. Results: Youth who received some form of travel assistance (16.0%) almost uniformly enrolled in the treatment portion of the RCT. Youth who lived further away from the study site (p =.047) or whose primary caregiver never married (p =.01) were less likely to enroll. Of note, socioeconomic status (SES) variables (parent education and child insurance status) did not significantly predict enrollment, suggesting that study incentives or accommodations may have adequately addressed barriers commonly associated with SES. Limitations: Due to the fairly high trial enrollment rate (approximately 80%), there likely was limited power to detect some differences between groups. Generalizability may be limited to youth with a primary mood disorder diagnosis. Conclusions: Despite retaining a large proportion of the youth who screened eligible, participant self-selection is a limitation of any RCT. A silent inclusion criterion of any RCT is willingness to be randomized.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Children

KW - Mood disorders

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Trial enrollment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045546395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045546395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.024

M3 - Article

VL - 235

SP - 368

EP - 373

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -