Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems

Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory

Kevin P. Weinfurt, Adrian F. Hernandez, Gloria D. Coronado, Lynn L. DeBar, Laura M. Dember, Beverly B. Green, Patrick J. Heagerty, Susan S. Huang, Kathryn T. James, Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Eric B. Larson, Vincent Mor, Richard Platt, Gary E. Rosenthal, Edward J. Septimus, Gregory E. Simon, Karen L. Staman, Jeremy Sugarman, Miguel Vazquez, Douglas Zatzick & 1 others Lesley H. Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The clinical research enterprise is not producing the evidence decision makers arguably need in a timely and cost effective manner; research currently involves the use of labor-intensive parallel systems that are separate from clinical care. The emergence of pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) poses a possible solution: these large-scale trials are embedded within routine clinical care and often involve cluster randomization of hospitals, clinics, primary care providers, etc. Interventions can be implemented by health system personnel through usual communication channels and quality improvement infrastructure, and data collected as part of routine clinical care. However, experience with these trials is nascent and best practices regarding design operational, analytic, and reporting methodologies are undeveloped. Methods: To strengthen the national capacity to implement cost-effective, large-scale PCTs, the Common Fund of the National Institutes of Health created the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory (Collaboratory) to support the design, execution, and dissemination of a series of demonstration projects using a pragmatic research design. Results: In this article, we will describe the Collaboratory, highlight some of the challenges encountered and solutions developed thus far, and discuss remaining barriers and opportunities for large-scale evidence generation using PCTs. Conclusion: A planning phase is critical, and even with careful planning, new challenges arise during execution; comparisons between arms can be complicated by unanticipated changes. Early and ongoing engagement with both health care system leaders and front-line clinicians is critical for success. There is also marked uncertainty when applying existing ethical and regulatory frameworks to PCTS, and using existing electronic health records for data capture adds complexity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number144
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2017

Fingerprint

Pragmatic Clinical Trials
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Electronic Health Records
Health Services Research
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Random Allocation
Quality Improvement
Practice Guidelines
Research
Health Personnel
Uncertainty
Primary Health Care
Research Design
Communication

Keywords

  • Cluster randomized trials
  • Embedded clinical trials
  • Pragmatic clinical research
  • Pragmatic research
  • Stakeholder engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Weinfurt, K. P., Hernandez, A. F., Coronado, G. D., DeBar, L. L., Dember, L. M., Green, B. B., ... Curtis, L. H. (2017). Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), [144]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0420-7

Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems : Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory. / Weinfurt, Kevin P.; Hernandez, Adrian F.; Coronado, Gloria D.; DeBar, Lynn L.; Dember, Laura M.; Green, Beverly B.; Heagerty, Patrick J.; Huang, Susan S.; James, Kathryn T.; Jarvik, Jeffrey G.; Larson, Eric B.; Mor, Vincent; Platt, Richard; Rosenthal, Gary E.; Septimus, Edward J.; Simon, Gregory E.; Staman, Karen L.; Sugarman, Jeremy; Vazquez, Miguel; Zatzick, Douglas; Curtis, Lesley H.

In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 144, 18.09.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weinfurt, KP, Hernandez, AF, Coronado, GD, DeBar, LL, Dember, LM, Green, BB, Heagerty, PJ, Huang, SS, James, KT, Jarvik, JG, Larson, EB, Mor, V, Platt, R, Rosenthal, GE, Septimus, EJ, Simon, GE, Staman, KL, Sugarman, J, Vazquez, M, Zatzick, D & Curtis, LH 2017, 'Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory', BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 17, no. 1, 144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0420-7
Weinfurt, Kevin P. ; Hernandez, Adrian F. ; Coronado, Gloria D. ; DeBar, Lynn L. ; Dember, Laura M. ; Green, Beverly B. ; Heagerty, Patrick J. ; Huang, Susan S. ; James, Kathryn T. ; Jarvik, Jeffrey G. ; Larson, Eric B. ; Mor, Vincent ; Platt, Richard ; Rosenthal, Gary E. ; Septimus, Edward J. ; Simon, Gregory E. ; Staman, Karen L. ; Sugarman, Jeremy ; Vazquez, Miguel ; Zatzick, Douglas ; Curtis, Lesley H. / Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems : Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory. In: BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 1.
@article{7765020951d0444ea6850413044b558e,
title = "Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory",
abstract = "Background: The clinical research enterprise is not producing the evidence decision makers arguably need in a timely and cost effective manner; research currently involves the use of labor-intensive parallel systems that are separate from clinical care. The emergence of pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) poses a possible solution: these large-scale trials are embedded within routine clinical care and often involve cluster randomization of hospitals, clinics, primary care providers, etc. Interventions can be implemented by health system personnel through usual communication channels and quality improvement infrastructure, and data collected as part of routine clinical care. However, experience with these trials is nascent and best practices regarding design operational, analytic, and reporting methodologies are undeveloped. Methods: To strengthen the national capacity to implement cost-effective, large-scale PCTs, the Common Fund of the National Institutes of Health created the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory (Collaboratory) to support the design, execution, and dissemination of a series of demonstration projects using a pragmatic research design. Results: In this article, we will describe the Collaboratory, highlight some of the challenges encountered and solutions developed thus far, and discuss remaining barriers and opportunities for large-scale evidence generation using PCTs. Conclusion: A planning phase is critical, and even with careful planning, new challenges arise during execution; comparisons between arms can be complicated by unanticipated changes. Early and ongoing engagement with both health care system leaders and front-line clinicians is critical for success. There is also marked uncertainty when applying existing ethical and regulatory frameworks to PCTS, and using existing electronic health records for data capture adds complexity.",
keywords = "Cluster randomized trials, Embedded clinical trials, Pragmatic clinical research, Pragmatic research, Stakeholder engagement",
author = "Weinfurt, {Kevin P.} and Hernandez, {Adrian F.} and Coronado, {Gloria D.} and DeBar, {Lynn L.} and Dember, {Laura M.} and Green, {Beverly B.} and Heagerty, {Patrick J.} and Huang, {Susan S.} and James, {Kathryn T.} and Jarvik, {Jeffrey G.} and Larson, {Eric B.} and Vincent Mor and Richard Platt and Rosenthal, {Gary E.} and Septimus, {Edward J.} and Simon, {Gregory E.} and Staman, {Karen L.} and Jeremy Sugarman and Miguel Vazquez and Douglas Zatzick and Curtis, {Lesley H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1186/s12874-017-0420-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems

T2 - Generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory

AU - Weinfurt, Kevin P.

AU - Hernandez, Adrian F.

AU - Coronado, Gloria D.

AU - DeBar, Lynn L.

AU - Dember, Laura M.

AU - Green, Beverly B.

AU - Heagerty, Patrick J.

AU - Huang, Susan S.

AU - James, Kathryn T.

AU - Jarvik, Jeffrey G.

AU - Larson, Eric B.

AU - Mor, Vincent

AU - Platt, Richard

AU - Rosenthal, Gary E.

AU - Septimus, Edward J.

AU - Simon, Gregory E.

AU - Staman, Karen L.

AU - Sugarman, Jeremy

AU - Vazquez, Miguel

AU - Zatzick, Douglas

AU - Curtis, Lesley H.

PY - 2017/9/18

Y1 - 2017/9/18

N2 - Background: The clinical research enterprise is not producing the evidence decision makers arguably need in a timely and cost effective manner; research currently involves the use of labor-intensive parallel systems that are separate from clinical care. The emergence of pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) poses a possible solution: these large-scale trials are embedded within routine clinical care and often involve cluster randomization of hospitals, clinics, primary care providers, etc. Interventions can be implemented by health system personnel through usual communication channels and quality improvement infrastructure, and data collected as part of routine clinical care. However, experience with these trials is nascent and best practices regarding design operational, analytic, and reporting methodologies are undeveloped. Methods: To strengthen the national capacity to implement cost-effective, large-scale PCTs, the Common Fund of the National Institutes of Health created the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory (Collaboratory) to support the design, execution, and dissemination of a series of demonstration projects using a pragmatic research design. Results: In this article, we will describe the Collaboratory, highlight some of the challenges encountered and solutions developed thus far, and discuss remaining barriers and opportunities for large-scale evidence generation using PCTs. Conclusion: A planning phase is critical, and even with careful planning, new challenges arise during execution; comparisons between arms can be complicated by unanticipated changes. Early and ongoing engagement with both health care system leaders and front-line clinicians is critical for success. There is also marked uncertainty when applying existing ethical and regulatory frameworks to PCTS, and using existing electronic health records for data capture adds complexity.

AB - Background: The clinical research enterprise is not producing the evidence decision makers arguably need in a timely and cost effective manner; research currently involves the use of labor-intensive parallel systems that are separate from clinical care. The emergence of pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) poses a possible solution: these large-scale trials are embedded within routine clinical care and often involve cluster randomization of hospitals, clinics, primary care providers, etc. Interventions can be implemented by health system personnel through usual communication channels and quality improvement infrastructure, and data collected as part of routine clinical care. However, experience with these trials is nascent and best practices regarding design operational, analytic, and reporting methodologies are undeveloped. Methods: To strengthen the national capacity to implement cost-effective, large-scale PCTs, the Common Fund of the National Institutes of Health created the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory (Collaboratory) to support the design, execution, and dissemination of a series of demonstration projects using a pragmatic research design. Results: In this article, we will describe the Collaboratory, highlight some of the challenges encountered and solutions developed thus far, and discuss remaining barriers and opportunities for large-scale evidence generation using PCTs. Conclusion: A planning phase is critical, and even with careful planning, new challenges arise during execution; comparisons between arms can be complicated by unanticipated changes. Early and ongoing engagement with both health care system leaders and front-line clinicians is critical for success. There is also marked uncertainty when applying existing ethical and regulatory frameworks to PCTS, and using existing electronic health records for data capture adds complexity.

KW - Cluster randomized trials

KW - Embedded clinical trials

KW - Pragmatic clinical research

KW - Pragmatic research

KW - Stakeholder engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029584777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029584777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12874-017-0420-7

DO - 10.1186/s12874-017-0420-7

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

IS - 1

M1 - 144

ER -