Potential pitfalls in interpreting maps of stabilized rates

Lawrence H. Moulton, Betsy Foxman, Robert A. Wolfe, Friedrich K. Port

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There have been many advances in the mapping of disease mortality and morbidity rates in recent years. An increasingly common approach is to calculate “stabilized” rates for individual geographic areas by incorporating information from the entire set of data. One such method, adopted by the National Cancer Institute for its mortality maps, is described and applied to national end-stage renal disease data. Some possible difficulties in interpretation are noted, resulting from: (1) insufficient shrinkage, (2) highly skewed rate distributions, (3) different denominator distributions, and (4) variations in population density.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-301
Number of pages5
JournalEpidemiology
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1994

Keywords

  • Biometrics
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Geographic variation
  • Maps

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Potential pitfalls in interpreting maps of stabilized rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this