Potential applications of conventional and molecular imaging to biodefense research

King Li, David Thomasson, Loren Ketai, Chris Contag, Martin Pomper, Mary Wright, Mike Bray

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Imaging methods that visualize the structure and function of the living body are widely used in patient care and biomedical research, but their full potential has not yet been applied to the study and treatment of the severe illnesses caused by pathogens of biodefense concern. "Conventional" imaging techniques (e.g., radiography, computed tomography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging) delineate anatomic changes in tissues, whereas "molecular" methods employ magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, or optical (fluorescence or bioluminescence) imaging to detect biochemical reactions that accompany pathogen replication or host responses. We review the basic principles of these methods, describe the diseases caused by 6 pathogens classified as category A or B bioterror agents (anthrax, plague, tularemia, filoviral hemorrhagic fever, smallpox, and aerosolized equine encephalitis virus infection), and discuss how imaging could be used to study their pathogenesis in laboratory animals and to diagnose and monitor infection in humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1471-1480
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume40
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Potential applications of conventional and molecular imaging to biodefense research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this