Potential applications of conventional and molecular imaging to biodefense research

King Li, David Thomasson, Loren Ketai, Chris Contag, Martin Gilbert Pomper, Mary Wright, Mike Bray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Imaging methods that visualize the structure and function of the living body are widely used in patient care and biomedical research, but their full potential has not yet been applied to the study and treatment of the severe illnesses caused by pathogens of biodefense concern. "Conventional" imaging techniques (e.g., radiography, computed tomography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging) delineate anatomic changes in tissues, whereas "molecular" methods employ magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, or optical (fluorescence or bioluminescence) imaging to detect biochemical reactions that accompany pathogen replication or host responses. We review the basic principles of these methods, describe the diseases caused by 6 pathogens classified as category A or B bioterror agents (anthrax, plague, tularemia, filoviral hemorrhagic fever, smallpox, and aerosolized equine encephalitis virus infection), and discuss how imaging could be used to study their pathogenesis in laboratory animals and to diagnose and monitor infection in humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1471-1480
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume40
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2005

Fingerprint

Molecular Imaging
Equine Encephalomyelitis
Encephalitis Viruses
Research
Tularemia
Anthrax
Smallpox
Plague
Laboratory Animals
Virus Diseases
Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Radiography
Positron-Emission Tomography
Biomedical Research
Patient Care
Fever
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Fluorescence
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology

Cite this

Potential applications of conventional and molecular imaging to biodefense research. / Li, King; Thomasson, David; Ketai, Loren; Contag, Chris; Pomper, Martin Gilbert; Wright, Mary; Bray, Mike.

In: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol. 40, No. 10, 15.05.2005, p. 1471-1480.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, K, Thomasson, D, Ketai, L, Contag, C, Pomper, MG, Wright, M & Bray, M 2005, 'Potential applications of conventional and molecular imaging to biodefense research', Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1471-1480. https://doi.org/10.1086/429723
Li, King ; Thomasson, David ; Ketai, Loren ; Contag, Chris ; Pomper, Martin Gilbert ; Wright, Mary ; Bray, Mike. / Potential applications of conventional and molecular imaging to biodefense research. In: Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005 ; Vol. 40, No. 10. pp. 1471-1480.
@article{6160675c4e424372bcee67ae90bb9daa,
title = "Potential applications of conventional and molecular imaging to biodefense research",
abstract = "Imaging methods that visualize the structure and function of the living body are widely used in patient care and biomedical research, but their full potential has not yet been applied to the study and treatment of the severe illnesses caused by pathogens of biodefense concern. {"}Conventional{"} imaging techniques (e.g., radiography, computed tomography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging) delineate anatomic changes in tissues, whereas {"}molecular{"} methods employ magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, or optical (fluorescence or bioluminescence) imaging to detect biochemical reactions that accompany pathogen replication or host responses. We review the basic principles of these methods, describe the diseases caused by 6 pathogens classified as category A or B bioterror agents (anthrax, plague, tularemia, filoviral hemorrhagic fever, smallpox, and aerosolized equine encephalitis virus infection), and discuss how imaging could be used to study their pathogenesis in laboratory animals and to diagnose and monitor infection in humans.",
author = "King Li and David Thomasson and Loren Ketai and Chris Contag and Pomper, {Martin Gilbert} and Mary Wright and Mike Bray",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1086/429723",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1471--1480",
journal = "Clinical Infectious Diseases",
issn = "1058-4838",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential applications of conventional and molecular imaging to biodefense research

AU - Li, King

AU - Thomasson, David

AU - Ketai, Loren

AU - Contag, Chris

AU - Pomper, Martin Gilbert

AU - Wright, Mary

AU - Bray, Mike

PY - 2005/5/15

Y1 - 2005/5/15

N2 - Imaging methods that visualize the structure and function of the living body are widely used in patient care and biomedical research, but their full potential has not yet been applied to the study and treatment of the severe illnesses caused by pathogens of biodefense concern. "Conventional" imaging techniques (e.g., radiography, computed tomography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging) delineate anatomic changes in tissues, whereas "molecular" methods employ magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, or optical (fluorescence or bioluminescence) imaging to detect biochemical reactions that accompany pathogen replication or host responses. We review the basic principles of these methods, describe the diseases caused by 6 pathogens classified as category A or B bioterror agents (anthrax, plague, tularemia, filoviral hemorrhagic fever, smallpox, and aerosolized equine encephalitis virus infection), and discuss how imaging could be used to study their pathogenesis in laboratory animals and to diagnose and monitor infection in humans.

AB - Imaging methods that visualize the structure and function of the living body are widely used in patient care and biomedical research, but their full potential has not yet been applied to the study and treatment of the severe illnesses caused by pathogens of biodefense concern. "Conventional" imaging techniques (e.g., radiography, computed tomography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging) delineate anatomic changes in tissues, whereas "molecular" methods employ magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, or optical (fluorescence or bioluminescence) imaging to detect biochemical reactions that accompany pathogen replication or host responses. We review the basic principles of these methods, describe the diseases caused by 6 pathogens classified as category A or B bioterror agents (anthrax, plague, tularemia, filoviral hemorrhagic fever, smallpox, and aerosolized equine encephalitis virus infection), and discuss how imaging could be used to study their pathogenesis in laboratory animals and to diagnose and monitor infection in humans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18244374195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18244374195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/429723

DO - 10.1086/429723

M3 - Article

C2 - 15844070

AN - SCOPUS:18244374195

VL - 40

SP - 1471

EP - 1480

JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases

JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases

SN - 1058-4838

IS - 10

ER -