Poststroke arm and hand paresis: should we target the cervical spinal cord?

Elvira Pirondini, Erick Carranza, Josep Maria Balaguer, Erynn Sorensen, Douglas J. Weber, John W. Krakauer, Marco Capogrosso

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite advances in understanding of corticospinal motor control and stroke pathophysiology, current rehabilitation therapies for poststroke upper limb paresis have limited efficacy at the level of impairment. To address this problem, we make the conceptual case for a new treatment approach. We first summarize current understanding of motor control deficits in the arm and hand after stroke and their shared physiological mechanisms with spinal cord injury (SCI). We then review studies of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for recovery of locomotion after SCI, which provide convincing evidence for enhancement of residual corticospinal function. By extrapolation, we argue for using cervical SCS to restore upper limb motor control after stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)568-578
Number of pages11
JournalTrends in neurosciences
Volume45
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

Keywords

  • hemiplegia
  • motor control
  • rehabilitation
  • spinal cord stimulation
  • therapeutic approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Poststroke arm and hand paresis: should we target the cervical spinal cord?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this