Population characteristics of markets of safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals

Darrell Gaskin, Jack Hadley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research Objectives. To compare and contrast the markets of urban safety-net (USN) hospitals with the markets of other urban hospitals. Study Design. To develop profiles of the actual inpatient markets of hospitals, we linked 1994 patient-level information from hospital discharge abstracts from nine states with 1990 data at the ZIP code level from the US Census Bureau. Each hospital's market was characterized by its racial and ethnic composition, median household income, poverty rate, and educational attainment. Measures of hospital competition were also calculated for each hospital. The analysis compared the market profiles of USN hospitals to those of other urban hospitals. We also compared the level of hospital competition and financial status of USN and other urban hospitals. Principal Findings. The markets of USN hospitals had higher proportions of racial and ethnic minorities and non-English-speaking residents. Adults residing in markets of USN hospitals were less educated. Families living in markets of USN hospitals had lower incomes and were more likely to be living at or below the federal poverty level. USN hospitals and other urban hospitals faced similar levels of competition and had similar margins. However, USN hospitals were more dependent on Medicare disproportionate share payments and on state and local government subsidies to remain solvent. Conclusion. USN hospitals disproportionately serve vulnerable minority and low-income communities that otherwise face financial and cultural barriers to health care. USN hospitals are dependent on the public subsidies they receive from federal, state, and local governments. Public policies and market pressures that affect the viability of USN hospitals place the access to care by vulnerable populations at risk. Public policy that jeopardizes public subsidies places in peril the financial health of these institutions. As Medicare and Medicaid managed care grow, USN hospitals may lose these patient revenues and public subsidies based on their Medicaid and Medicare patient volumes. The loss of these funds would hinder the ability of USN hospitals to finance uncompensated care for uninsured and underinsured patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-370
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Urban Health
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Safety-net Providers
Population Characteristics
Safety
market
Urban Hospitals
Medicare
State Government
Local Government
Medicaid
Poverty
Public Policy
Uncompensated Care
Government Financing
subsidy
Federal Government
Aptitude
Managed Care Programs
Vulnerable Populations
Censuses
Financial Management

Keywords

  • Hospital markets
  • Minority health
  • Safety-net hospitals
  • Urban hospitals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Population characteristics of markets of safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. / Gaskin, Darrell; Hadley, Jack.

In: Journal of Urban Health, Vol. 76, No. 3, 09.1999, p. 351-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a3f05632f4342c8be6496b730ba9354,
title = "Population characteristics of markets of safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals",
abstract = "Research Objectives. To compare and contrast the markets of urban safety-net (USN) hospitals with the markets of other urban hospitals. Study Design. To develop profiles of the actual inpatient markets of hospitals, we linked 1994 patient-level information from hospital discharge abstracts from nine states with 1990 data at the ZIP code level from the US Census Bureau. Each hospital's market was characterized by its racial and ethnic composition, median household income, poverty rate, and educational attainment. Measures of hospital competition were also calculated for each hospital. The analysis compared the market profiles of USN hospitals to those of other urban hospitals. We also compared the level of hospital competition and financial status of USN and other urban hospitals. Principal Findings. The markets of USN hospitals had higher proportions of racial and ethnic minorities and non-English-speaking residents. Adults residing in markets of USN hospitals were less educated. Families living in markets of USN hospitals had lower incomes and were more likely to be living at or below the federal poverty level. USN hospitals and other urban hospitals faced similar levels of competition and had similar margins. However, USN hospitals were more dependent on Medicare disproportionate share payments and on state and local government subsidies to remain solvent. Conclusion. USN hospitals disproportionately serve vulnerable minority and low-income communities that otherwise face financial and cultural barriers to health care. USN hospitals are dependent on the public subsidies they receive from federal, state, and local governments. Public policies and market pressures that affect the viability of USN hospitals place the access to care by vulnerable populations at risk. Public policy that jeopardizes public subsidies places in peril the financial health of these institutions. As Medicare and Medicaid managed care grow, USN hospitals may lose these patient revenues and public subsidies based on their Medicaid and Medicare patient volumes. The loss of these funds would hinder the ability of USN hospitals to finance uncompensated care for uninsured and underinsured patients.",
keywords = "Hospital markets, Minority health, Safety-net hospitals, Urban hospitals",
author = "Darrell Gaskin and Jack Hadley",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/BF02345673",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "351--370",
journal = "Journal of Urban Health",
issn = "1099-3460",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population characteristics of markets of safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals

AU - Gaskin, Darrell

AU - Hadley, Jack

PY - 1999/9

Y1 - 1999/9

N2 - Research Objectives. To compare and contrast the markets of urban safety-net (USN) hospitals with the markets of other urban hospitals. Study Design. To develop profiles of the actual inpatient markets of hospitals, we linked 1994 patient-level information from hospital discharge abstracts from nine states with 1990 data at the ZIP code level from the US Census Bureau. Each hospital's market was characterized by its racial and ethnic composition, median household income, poverty rate, and educational attainment. Measures of hospital competition were also calculated for each hospital. The analysis compared the market profiles of USN hospitals to those of other urban hospitals. We also compared the level of hospital competition and financial status of USN and other urban hospitals. Principal Findings. The markets of USN hospitals had higher proportions of racial and ethnic minorities and non-English-speaking residents. Adults residing in markets of USN hospitals were less educated. Families living in markets of USN hospitals had lower incomes and were more likely to be living at or below the federal poverty level. USN hospitals and other urban hospitals faced similar levels of competition and had similar margins. However, USN hospitals were more dependent on Medicare disproportionate share payments and on state and local government subsidies to remain solvent. Conclusion. USN hospitals disproportionately serve vulnerable minority and low-income communities that otherwise face financial and cultural barriers to health care. USN hospitals are dependent on the public subsidies they receive from federal, state, and local governments. Public policies and market pressures that affect the viability of USN hospitals place the access to care by vulnerable populations at risk. Public policy that jeopardizes public subsidies places in peril the financial health of these institutions. As Medicare and Medicaid managed care grow, USN hospitals may lose these patient revenues and public subsidies based on their Medicaid and Medicare patient volumes. The loss of these funds would hinder the ability of USN hospitals to finance uncompensated care for uninsured and underinsured patients.

AB - Research Objectives. To compare and contrast the markets of urban safety-net (USN) hospitals with the markets of other urban hospitals. Study Design. To develop profiles of the actual inpatient markets of hospitals, we linked 1994 patient-level information from hospital discharge abstracts from nine states with 1990 data at the ZIP code level from the US Census Bureau. Each hospital's market was characterized by its racial and ethnic composition, median household income, poverty rate, and educational attainment. Measures of hospital competition were also calculated for each hospital. The analysis compared the market profiles of USN hospitals to those of other urban hospitals. We also compared the level of hospital competition and financial status of USN and other urban hospitals. Principal Findings. The markets of USN hospitals had higher proportions of racial and ethnic minorities and non-English-speaking residents. Adults residing in markets of USN hospitals were less educated. Families living in markets of USN hospitals had lower incomes and were more likely to be living at or below the federal poverty level. USN hospitals and other urban hospitals faced similar levels of competition and had similar margins. However, USN hospitals were more dependent on Medicare disproportionate share payments and on state and local government subsidies to remain solvent. Conclusion. USN hospitals disproportionately serve vulnerable minority and low-income communities that otherwise face financial and cultural barriers to health care. USN hospitals are dependent on the public subsidies they receive from federal, state, and local governments. Public policies and market pressures that affect the viability of USN hospitals place the access to care by vulnerable populations at risk. Public policy that jeopardizes public subsidies places in peril the financial health of these institutions. As Medicare and Medicaid managed care grow, USN hospitals may lose these patient revenues and public subsidies based on their Medicaid and Medicare patient volumes. The loss of these funds would hinder the ability of USN hospitals to finance uncompensated care for uninsured and underinsured patients.

KW - Hospital markets

KW - Minority health

KW - Safety-net hospitals

KW - Urban hospitals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032868689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032868689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02345673

DO - 10.1007/BF02345673

M3 - Article

C2 - 12607901

AN - SCOPUS:0032868689

VL - 76

SP - 351

EP - 370

JO - Journal of Urban Health

JF - Journal of Urban Health

SN - 1099-3460

IS - 3

ER -