Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: A qualitative examination from the payer perspective

Emily F. Shortridge, Jonathan R. Moorea, Heidi Whitmore, Michael J. O'Grady, Angela K. Shen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objectives. Immunization against potentially life-threatening illnesses for children and adults has proved to be one of the great public health successes of the 20th century and is extremely cost-effective. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act includes a number of provisions to increase coverage and access to immunizations for the consumer, including a provision for health plans to cover all Advisory Committee on Immunization Practicesrecommended vaccines at first dollar, or without cost sharing. In this study, we examined payers' perspectives on first-dollar coverage of vaccines and strategies to improve vaccination rates. Methods. This was a qualitative study, using a literature review and semistructured expert interviews with payers. Results. Four key themes emerged, including (1) the cost implications of the first-dollar change; (2) the importance of examining barriers to children, adolescents, and adults separately to focus interventions more strategically; (3) the importance of provider knowledge and education in increasing immunization; and (4) the effect of first-dollar coverage on those who decline vaccination for personal reasons. Conclusions. We determined that, while reducing financial barriers through first-dollar coverage is an important first step to increasing immunization rates, there are structural and cultural barriers that also will require collaborative, strategic work among all vaccine stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-399
Number of pages6
JournalPublic Health Reports
Volume126
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Immunization
Vaccines
Vaccination
Cost Sharing
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Costs and Cost Analysis
Advisory Committees
Public Health
Interviews
Education
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Shortridge, E. F., Moorea, J. R., Whitmore, H., O'Grady, M. J., & Shen, A. K. (2011). Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: A qualitative examination from the payer perspective. Public Health Reports, 126(3), 394-399.

Policy implications of first-dollar coverage : A qualitative examination from the payer perspective. / Shortridge, Emily F.; Moorea, Jonathan R.; Whitmore, Heidi; O'Grady, Michael J.; Shen, Angela K.

In: Public Health Reports, Vol. 126, No. 3, 05.2011, p. 394-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Shortridge, EF, Moorea, JR, Whitmore, H, O'Grady, MJ & Shen, AK 2011, 'Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: A qualitative examination from the payer perspective', Public Health Reports, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 394-399.
Shortridge EF, Moorea JR, Whitmore H, O'Grady MJ, Shen AK. Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: A qualitative examination from the payer perspective. Public Health Reports. 2011 May;126(3):394-399.
Shortridge, Emily F. ; Moorea, Jonathan R. ; Whitmore, Heidi ; O'Grady, Michael J. ; Shen, Angela K. / Policy implications of first-dollar coverage : A qualitative examination from the payer perspective. In: Public Health Reports. 2011 ; Vol. 126, No. 3. pp. 394-399.
@article{61bb5d7f98ec40f397dcd473f092cd9b,
title = "Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: A qualitative examination from the payer perspective",
abstract = "Objectives. Immunization against potentially life-threatening illnesses for children and adults has proved to be one of the great public health successes of the 20th century and is extremely cost-effective. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act includes a number of provisions to increase coverage and access to immunizations for the consumer, including a provision for health plans to cover all Advisory Committee on Immunization Practicesrecommended vaccines at first dollar, or without cost sharing. In this study, we examined payers' perspectives on first-dollar coverage of vaccines and strategies to improve vaccination rates. Methods. This was a qualitative study, using a literature review and semistructured expert interviews with payers. Results. Four key themes emerged, including (1) the cost implications of the first-dollar change; (2) the importance of examining barriers to children, adolescents, and adults separately to focus interventions more strategically; (3) the importance of provider knowledge and education in increasing immunization; and (4) the effect of first-dollar coverage on those who decline vaccination for personal reasons. Conclusions. We determined that, while reducing financial barriers through first-dollar coverage is an important first step to increasing immunization rates, there are structural and cultural barriers that also will require collaborative, strategic work among all vaccine stakeholders.",
author = "Shortridge, {Emily F.} and Moorea, {Jonathan R.} and Heidi Whitmore and O'Grady, {Michael J.} and Shen, {Angela K.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "394--399",
journal = "Public Health Reports",
issn = "0033-3549",
publisher = "Association of Schools of Public Health",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy implications of first-dollar coverage

T2 - A qualitative examination from the payer perspective

AU - Shortridge, Emily F.

AU - Moorea, Jonathan R.

AU - Whitmore, Heidi

AU - O'Grady, Michael J.

AU - Shen, Angela K.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Objectives. Immunization against potentially life-threatening illnesses for children and adults has proved to be one of the great public health successes of the 20th century and is extremely cost-effective. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act includes a number of provisions to increase coverage and access to immunizations for the consumer, including a provision for health plans to cover all Advisory Committee on Immunization Practicesrecommended vaccines at first dollar, or without cost sharing. In this study, we examined payers' perspectives on first-dollar coverage of vaccines and strategies to improve vaccination rates. Methods. This was a qualitative study, using a literature review and semistructured expert interviews with payers. Results. Four key themes emerged, including (1) the cost implications of the first-dollar change; (2) the importance of examining barriers to children, adolescents, and adults separately to focus interventions more strategically; (3) the importance of provider knowledge and education in increasing immunization; and (4) the effect of first-dollar coverage on those who decline vaccination for personal reasons. Conclusions. We determined that, while reducing financial barriers through first-dollar coverage is an important first step to increasing immunization rates, there are structural and cultural barriers that also will require collaborative, strategic work among all vaccine stakeholders.

AB - Objectives. Immunization against potentially life-threatening illnesses for children and adults has proved to be one of the great public health successes of the 20th century and is extremely cost-effective. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act includes a number of provisions to increase coverage and access to immunizations for the consumer, including a provision for health plans to cover all Advisory Committee on Immunization Practicesrecommended vaccines at first dollar, or without cost sharing. In this study, we examined payers' perspectives on first-dollar coverage of vaccines and strategies to improve vaccination rates. Methods. This was a qualitative study, using a literature review and semistructured expert interviews with payers. Results. Four key themes emerged, including (1) the cost implications of the first-dollar change; (2) the importance of examining barriers to children, adolescents, and adults separately to focus interventions more strategically; (3) the importance of provider knowledge and education in increasing immunization; and (4) the effect of first-dollar coverage on those who decline vaccination for personal reasons. Conclusions. We determined that, while reducing financial barriers through first-dollar coverage is an important first step to increasing immunization rates, there are structural and cultural barriers that also will require collaborative, strategic work among all vaccine stakeholders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957869882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957869882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 21553668

AN - SCOPUS:79957869882

VL - 126

SP - 394

EP - 399

JO - Public Health Reports

JF - Public Health Reports

SN - 0033-3549

IS - 3

ER -