Policies of academic medical centers for disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants

Kevin P. Weinfurt, Michaela A. Dinan, Jennifer S. Allsbrook, Joëlle Y. Friedman, Mark A. Hall, Kevin A. Schulman, Jeremy Sugarman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To document the current state of institutional review board (IRB) and conflict of interest committee policies regarding disclosures of financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants, and to use this information to identify and share models for effectively achieving disclosure. METHOD: The authors identified the 123 U.S. academic medical centers that have IRBs and sought their IRB and institutional policies regarding financial conflicts of interest. In February and March 2004, using manual and key word searches, each institution's Web site was searched to identify documents containing information regarding the disclosure of financial conflicts of interest. Letters were sent to 24 institutions that had either no information or incomplete information posted on their Web sites. To assess institutions' guidelines for disclosure, the authors extracted and content coded each institution's information on disclosure. RESULTS: Relevant information was obtained from 120 (98%) academic medical centers (AMCs), of which 57 (48%) mentioned disclosing financial conflicts to potential research participants. Of these 57, 33 (58%) included verbatim language that could be used in informed consent documents. AMCs' recommendations and requirements for disclosure included details of the financial arrangement, administrative management of conflicts of interest, and encouragement of dialogue between the investigator and the potential research participant. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists concerning the specific information that should be disclosed. Most of the AMCs' policies were consistent with the goal of protection from legal liability. Significant questions remain, however, concerning the goals of disclosure and the most effective methods for achieving those goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-118
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Conflict of Interest
conflict of interest
Disclosure
Research
Research Ethics Committees
Organizational Policy
Consent Forms
Legal Liability
liability
Language
dialogue
Research Personnel
Guidelines
language
management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Policies of academic medical centers for disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants. / Weinfurt, Kevin P.; Dinan, Michaela A.; Allsbrook, Jennifer S.; Friedman, Joëlle Y.; Hall, Mark A.; Schulman, Kevin A.; Sugarman, Jeremy.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 81, No. 2, 02.2006, p. 113-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weinfurt, Kevin P. ; Dinan, Michaela A. ; Allsbrook, Jennifer S. ; Friedman, Joëlle Y. ; Hall, Mark A. ; Schulman, Kevin A. ; Sugarman, Jeremy. / Policies of academic medical centers for disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants. In: Academic Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 81, No. 2. pp. 113-118.
@article{b863a6a191ec4ae4bfd9168c391564a6,
title = "Policies of academic medical centers for disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To document the current state of institutional review board (IRB) and conflict of interest committee policies regarding disclosures of financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants, and to use this information to identify and share models for effectively achieving disclosure. METHOD: The authors identified the 123 U.S. academic medical centers that have IRBs and sought their IRB and institutional policies regarding financial conflicts of interest. In February and March 2004, using manual and key word searches, each institution's Web site was searched to identify documents containing information regarding the disclosure of financial conflicts of interest. Letters were sent to 24 institutions that had either no information or incomplete information posted on their Web sites. To assess institutions' guidelines for disclosure, the authors extracted and content coded each institution's information on disclosure. RESULTS: Relevant information was obtained from 120 (98{\%}) academic medical centers (AMCs), of which 57 (48{\%}) mentioned disclosing financial conflicts to potential research participants. Of these 57, 33 (58{\%}) included verbatim language that could be used in informed consent documents. AMCs' recommendations and requirements for disclosure included details of the financial arrangement, administrative management of conflicts of interest, and encouragement of dialogue between the investigator and the potential research participant. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists concerning the specific information that should be disclosed. Most of the AMCs' policies were consistent with the goal of protection from legal liability. Significant questions remain, however, concerning the goals of disclosure and the most effective methods for achieving those goals.",
author = "Weinfurt, {Kevin P.} and Dinan, {Michaela A.} and Allsbrook, {Jennifer S.} and Friedman, {Jo{\"e}lle Y.} and Hall, {Mark A.} and Schulman, {Kevin A.} and Jeremy Sugarman",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/00001888-200602000-00003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "113--118",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policies of academic medical centers for disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants

AU - Weinfurt, Kevin P.

AU - Dinan, Michaela A.

AU - Allsbrook, Jennifer S.

AU - Friedman, Joëlle Y.

AU - Hall, Mark A.

AU - Schulman, Kevin A.

AU - Sugarman, Jeremy

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - PURPOSE: To document the current state of institutional review board (IRB) and conflict of interest committee policies regarding disclosures of financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants, and to use this information to identify and share models for effectively achieving disclosure. METHOD: The authors identified the 123 U.S. academic medical centers that have IRBs and sought their IRB and institutional policies regarding financial conflicts of interest. In February and March 2004, using manual and key word searches, each institution's Web site was searched to identify documents containing information regarding the disclosure of financial conflicts of interest. Letters were sent to 24 institutions that had either no information or incomplete information posted on their Web sites. To assess institutions' guidelines for disclosure, the authors extracted and content coded each institution's information on disclosure. RESULTS: Relevant information was obtained from 120 (98%) academic medical centers (AMCs), of which 57 (48%) mentioned disclosing financial conflicts to potential research participants. Of these 57, 33 (58%) included verbatim language that could be used in informed consent documents. AMCs' recommendations and requirements for disclosure included details of the financial arrangement, administrative management of conflicts of interest, and encouragement of dialogue between the investigator and the potential research participant. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists concerning the specific information that should be disclosed. Most of the AMCs' policies were consistent with the goal of protection from legal liability. Significant questions remain, however, concerning the goals of disclosure and the most effective methods for achieving those goals.

AB - PURPOSE: To document the current state of institutional review board (IRB) and conflict of interest committee policies regarding disclosures of financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants, and to use this information to identify and share models for effectively achieving disclosure. METHOD: The authors identified the 123 U.S. academic medical centers that have IRBs and sought their IRB and institutional policies regarding financial conflicts of interest. In February and March 2004, using manual and key word searches, each institution's Web site was searched to identify documents containing information regarding the disclosure of financial conflicts of interest. Letters were sent to 24 institutions that had either no information or incomplete information posted on their Web sites. To assess institutions' guidelines for disclosure, the authors extracted and content coded each institution's information on disclosure. RESULTS: Relevant information was obtained from 120 (98%) academic medical centers (AMCs), of which 57 (48%) mentioned disclosing financial conflicts to potential research participants. Of these 57, 33 (58%) included verbatim language that could be used in informed consent documents. AMCs' recommendations and requirements for disclosure included details of the financial arrangement, administrative management of conflicts of interest, and encouragement of dialogue between the investigator and the potential research participant. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists concerning the specific information that should be disclosed. Most of the AMCs' policies were consistent with the goal of protection from legal liability. Significant questions remain, however, concerning the goals of disclosure and the most effective methods for achieving those goals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645801605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645801605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001888-200602000-00003

DO - 10.1097/00001888-200602000-00003

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 113

EP - 118

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 2

ER -